Ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET; IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JACKSON EX DEM. MARTHA BRADSTREET VS. DANIEL THOMAS (1830)

![]() |
ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET; IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JACKSON EX DEM. MARTHA BRADSTREET VS. DANIEL THOMAS |
---|
Term: 1830 |
Important Dates |
Decided: March 6, 1830 |
Outcome |
Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
Vote |
7-0 |
Majority |
Henry Baldwin • Gabriel Duvall • William Johnson Jr. • John Marshall • John McLean • Joseph Story • Smith Thompson |
ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET; IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JACKSON EX DEM. MARTHA BRADSTREET VS. DANIEL THOMAS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 6, 1830.
In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the New York Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including Supreme Court Rules, application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in civil litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and state rules and admiralty rules
- Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Judge
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 29 U.S. 102
- How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Marshall
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes