Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Fact checks: Ohio Issue 2, Drug Price Standards Initiative (2017)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Fact Check by Ballotpedia-Bold.png

Ohio voted on Issue 2, an initiative to require the state to purchase prescription drugs at prices no higher than what is paid by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, on November 7, 2017.

Ballotpedia has fact-checked the following claims about Ohio Issue 2.

Ohio Issue 2 and VA drug price availability

October 19, 2017

Opponents of Issue 2 claim that the plan is unworkable because the VA does not publicly disclose the lowest price paid for all drugs.[1] A report funded by Ohio Taxpayers for Lower Drug Prices, a political action committee (PAC) that supports Issue 2, claims that it is "unclear" how many VA drug prices are not public, but "it does not seem to be many."[2]

How many VA drug prices are not publicly available?

There are 17,969 pharmaceutical contract prices publicly accessible on the VA website, and a department official told Ballotpedia that the VA does not publicly disclose 1,656 drug prices.[3][4]

Read more here.

Who is promoting Ohio Issue 2?

October 18, 2017

Ohioans Against the Deceptive Rx Issue, a PAC opposed to the Issue 2 initiative, claims, "Issue 2 is being promoted by a billion-dollar California-based nonprofit, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), that gets nearly 80% of its revenue from selling prescription drugs."[5] On its website, the group also claims that the AHF is "Issue 2's main funder."[6]

Does the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) receive nearly 80 percent of its revenue from selling prescription drugs? Is the AHF the main funder of support for Issue 2?

According to the AHF's 2016 financial statement, 79.4 percent of its revenue ($924 million of total revenue) came from reimbursements from insurers for providing prescription drugs to patients.[7][8][9]

Read more here.

Does Ohio Issue 2 give promoters the right to defend the law at taxpayer expense?

October 4, 2017

According to Ohioans Against the Deceptive Rx Issue, a PAC opposed to the initiative, Issue 2 includes "an unprecedented provision to give themselves [the promoters of Issue 2] the right to intervene at taxpayer expense in any legal challenges that may be filed against it if it becomes law. This provision would give the sponsors a blank check to defend any part of the law, and require that their legal fees be reimbursed by taxpayers whether they win or lose."[10]

Does Issue 2 grant promoters the right to intervene in any legal challenge at taxpayer expense?

Yes. Issue 2 designates four individuals as a committee to represent the initiative petitioners, and permits any one or more of them to defend Issue 2 in court at taxpayer expense. The four proponents are: William Booth, Tracy Jones, Latonya Thurman, and Daniel Darland.[11] The first three work with the AIDS Healthcare Foundation as either employees or contractors, the principal source of funding for the initiative.[12]

The initiative also provides that the proponents shall be jointly and severally liable to pay a fine of $10,000 to the state if any provision of Issue 2 is deemed by a court to be unenforceable.[11]

Read more here.

Fact Check- 1000 x 218 px.png
Launched in October 2015 and active through October 2018, Fact Check by Ballotpedia examined claims made by elected officials, political appointees, and political candidates at the federal, state, and local levels. We evaluated claims made by politicians of all backgrounds and affiliations, subjecting them to the same objective and neutral examination process. As of 2025, Ballotpedia staff periodically review these articles to reevaluate and reaffirm our conclusions. Please email us with questions, comments, or concerns about these articles. To learn more about our fact-checking process, click here.

Contact Us

We welcome comments from our readers. If you have a question, comment, or suggestion for a claim that you think we should look into, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. You can also contact us on Facebook and Twitter.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Facebook.png
Twitter.png


Footnotes

BP logo.png
Fact Check- 1000 x 218 px.png
About fact-checkingContact us • Staff • Ballotpedia