Kansas City, Missouri, Question 1, Sales Tax for Early Childhood Education (April 2019)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Local ballot measure elections in 2019
Question 1: Kansas City Sales Tax for Early Childhood Education
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
April 2, 2019
Status:
Defeatedd Defeated
Topic:
Local sales tax
Amount: $0.375
Expires in: 10 years
Related articles
Local sales tax on the ballot
April 2, 2019 ballot measures in Missouri
Jackson County, Missouri ballot measures
Other counties
Local education on the ballot
See also
Kansas City, Missouri

A sales tax initiative was on the ballot for Kansas City voters in Missouri, on April 2, 2019. It was defeated.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of authorizing the city to enact a 0.375 percent sales tax for 10 years to fund pre-K, early childhood center improvements, and early childhood education staffing.
A no vote was a vote against authorizing the city to enact a 0.375 percent sales tax for 10 years to fund pre-K, early childhood center improvements, and early childhood education staffing.


Question 1 was designed to levy a citywide sales tax to fund pre-K instruction for more than 5,400 four- and five-year-olds living within the boundaries of Kansas City, according to the initiative's full text. Approval of the measure would have dedicated sales tax funds to early childhood education centers and the city's early childhood education workforce. The tax would have been applied to retail sales of taxable items and services in Kansas City for 10 years beginning on October 1, 2019. Under the initiative, a five-member economic development tax board would have been established to oversee expenditures.[1]

Question 1 was on the ballot in Cass County, Clay County, Jackson County, and Platte County, Missouri.

Election results

Kansas City Question 1

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 19,138 34.04%

Defeated No

37,077 65.96%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[2]

Shall the City of Kansas City impose a sales tax authorized by Section 67.1305 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri for a period of 10 years at a rate of 3/8% to be used for economic development purposes through funding Pre-K instruction for four and five year olds the year before they enter kindergarten, funding improvements to early childhood centers, and investing in the City’s early childhood education workforce?[3]

Full text

The full text of the initiative is available here.

Support

Progress KC campaign logo

Proponents

  • Progress KC led the campaign in support of the initiative, known by proponents as Pre-K for KC.[4]
    • A list of endorsements for the support campaign can be viewed here.
  • Kansas City Mayor Sly James campaigned in favor of the initiative.
  • The following city council member stated in The Kansas City Star that she supported Question 1:[5]

Arguments

Progress KC stated the following in favor of Question 1 on its website:[6]

Investing in high-quality pre-K for Kansas City’s kids will pay off for us in both the short and long term. There is literally no better way to invest our resources. What’s more, the program will be independently evaluated for effectiveness and voters can decide whether to renew it after 10 years.

When we invest in pre-K, we ensure our students are ready to learn when they enter the K-12 system. We provide them with education during a critical time in their brain development.

We also enjoy future benefits like reduced juvenile crime, a better prepared workforce, and a strong return on our investment of $7 in savings for every $1 we invest.[3]

—Progress KC

Mayor Sly James made the following argument in favor of Question 1:[4]

When I took office in 2011 only 33% of Kansas City third graders could read at the appropriate grade level. Today it’s up to 55%, which is better, but still behind the state average of 62%.

This is an urgent problem for us because research tells us that third grade reading proficiency is a predictor for success later in life. Kids who can’t read at a third grade level by the third grade usually end up slowly slipping through the cracks.

I’m not going to leave office without doing something about it.[3]

—Mayor Sly James

Opposition

Vote No KC Question campaign logo

Opponents

Arguments

Vote No KC Question 1 made the following arguments against the initiative on its website:[7]

  1. A very small amount of the millions generated by the 3/8 cent sales tax will actually benefit students.​ Only $7 million would actually go to Pre-K programs, with the rest of the money tied up in administrative costs and further training. Only 700 students of approximately 9,000+ eligible children would benefit. Only 7% of eligible children would be served. This is NOT Universal! Only 25% of the approximately $30 million in sales tax revenue would be spent for direct services to children during the first three years of implementation.
  2. The mayor’s plan is a regressive sales tax that would disproportionately impact the least able to pay. Not only that, but most of these more disadvantaged communities still have to pay their property taxes while the Mayor continues to let developers get a pass on paying their property taxes so that they can build luxury hotels downtown. If this sales tax passes, that means the most disadvantaged communities will be paying TWICE for something they should already have access to.
  3. The mayor’s plan would provide funding for private and parochial schools (vouchers). This is in direct conflict with Missouri Constitution Article IX, which specifically restricts public funding for any “institution of learning controlled by any religious creed, church or sectarian denomination”.
  4. Monies ultimately will be overseen by a Mayor-appointed commission and the KC City Council, essentially preventing locally-elected boards of education from serving in their governance role.[3]
—Vote No KC Question 1

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Missouri

This measure was put on the ballot through a successful citizen initiative petition drive.

Alvin Brooks, Maria Chaurand, Leslie Fields, Ed Ford, Seft Hunter, Dwon Littlejohn, George Lopez, and Mary Spence filed the petition for Question 1. The signature requirement to place initiatives on the ballot in Kansas City is 5 percent of the total votes cast for mayoral candidates at the preceding regular municipal election. To place an initiative on the ballot for April 2, 2019, the required number of signatures was 1,708. Proponents submitted signatures for the initiative, of which 1,984 were validated by the city clerk's office on August 3, 2018.[1]

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Footnotes