Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Missouri House of Representatives District 132 candidate surveys, 2022

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


This article shows responses from candidates in the 2022 election for Missouri House of Representatives District 132 who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey.

Candidates and election results

General election

General election for Missouri House of Representatives District 132

Incumbent Crystal Quade defeated Stephanos Freeman in the general election for Missouri House of Representatives District 132 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Crystal Quade
Crystal Quade (D)
 
56.4
 
3,978
Image of Stephanos Freeman
Stephanos Freeman (R) Candidate Connection
 
43.6
 
3,075

Total votes: 7,053
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

We need more transparency in government.

We need the State to fight for us.

We need to understand our opponents.
Without Transparency why do we bother? We need an easy website to see what laws are passed by clicking an issue, see who voted for and against with a click, and who supports their campaigns also a click. If we want people to be involved we need to make it easier for them to find out what is going on.

ESG, the Digital Dollar, and insider-trading in Congress should all be fought on the state level. Ban Congressional Members from office eligibility if trading on insider knowledge. Ban the use of ESG scores. Make alternative trade agreements with other States to protect against the Digital Dollar.

Prevent propaganda in the schools by refusing to fund Publishers of this curriculum in schools
They need to have vision- see how law will work in real life, how will it work well, what are the problems it causes or ignores,

They need to understand that government created harm is worse than government neglect, not everything needs to be legislated. They need to respect our Constitution and “Tradition” because they work, small changes can have big results.

They need to be able to work with or call out each other to get things done.
I understand the opposition’s leadership- their terms, assumptions, goals and strategy.

I understand that they are not a United organization. I can apply historical trends to modern policy making. I have always poked holes in the ideas and policies of experts and decision makers. I am not a Yes-Man.

I have the wisdom to know my abilities are limited and I must continue to learn.
I would like to live a legacy of more meaningful public involvement. Modern technology and society separates us from who and what we’re meant to be. It keeps us from learning about each other on a personal level. People are imprisoned only by their minds. No you can’t do anything or everything but if you see clearly enough you will ask yourself the right questions (What can I do?) and excel in that. There’s so much noise and confusion. If we can get past people trying to sell you on who are, then it would be so much easier for young people to learn it. It is not that complicated but it is a process.
I remember the OPEC embargo and the Carter election over Ford but the more important memory was of the Reagan assassination attempt because I was in Washington DC shortly after I turned 9. We couldn’t go to the White House because of it; so it felt so real. It probably helps that I saw a lot of history there as well. I went into the Capital building itself, saw firsthand historical and prehistorical objects in the Smithsonian. I suggest everyone bring their kids to see these statues, buildings, and pieces of art. It makes it seem so real; it makes it relatable. You are literally where it happened with things that were there. It definitely made an impact.
I am a single father and everyone knows parenting isn’t easy but it really epitomizes a larger issue, I see things may happen or go badly but have to relax have faith it will work out. Often, those of us who seem cold pick up on issues or signs but have to ignore them to go on productively with others. Then, of course. when things turn badly it is “why didn’t you say anything”. And if you did then you are judgmental. When should we say what’s on our minds? My answer in the political sphere was to go public!
The greatest challenge for us all is technology. How do we learn what is real when there are so many experts in deception? Beyond regular propaganda and hidden legislative methods there’s a real threat of “Deep Fakes”. Technology can make it look like you did and said something you didn’t. Then everyone jumps on the bandwagon and you’re name is mud.

People are on a screen at school, work, and entertainment. Complicated algorithms could turn your screen time into a Skinner Box, thus shaping your view of the world and how your children develop. It also effects children’s views on what is “real”.

How do we protect from this and also protect free speech and expression? Who gets to decide? How do we keep them in line (the protectors)?
Sure, it allows you to work with and understand the systems and modalities of the bureaucracy. It also can be part of the problem. Often an “Expert” goes unchallenged; it’s assumed they know best. Usually it is the case but often the baseline assumptions are incorrect, outmoded, or inappropriate for the problem. Knowledge and power does not equal the right or responsibility to act- that is comic book thinking. Often one requires the wisdom to not act, to allow the situation to resolve itself in due course. Unfortunately, people have to have it all right now and when they receive the natural consequences of their actions, they expect to get rescued.
We are not a dictatorship. While compromise is necessary, it should not be an excuse to tag on unrelated policies with it. For people to trust their government we need keep legislation on topic ie no bridges in St Louis for gun laws. It should be more in the line of getting a Gun Safety program in Schools in exchange for increased funding of other education program.



See also

More about these elections:

Select a district below to read responses from candidates in those races: