North Kansas City Hospital Board of Trustees v. St. Luke's Northland Hospital
North Kansas City Hospital Board of Trustees v. St. Luke's Northland Hospital was a case before the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District in 1998 concerning the applicability of open records laws to nonprofits.
Outcomes
The following precedents and outcomes came from this case:
- Public hospitals could not separate themselves from the public bodies that created them and were thus subject to the Missouri Sunshine Law.
- Missouri Trade Secret laws did not create an exemption for public records information that would otherwise have been available to the public through records requests.
- Individuals entering into contract with government reserved no right to privacy about the contract.
- Affirmed the decision of Librach v. Cooper, namely that employee contracts were not exempt as personal records.[1]
Background
North Kansas City (NKC) Hospital was a municipal public hospital managed and operated by Meritas, a private nonprofit corporation.
Meritas was incorporated in January 1993 as a not-for-profit corporation by the Board of Trustees of NKC Hospital. Its sole function according to its bylaws was to "be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of the Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital." Meritas operated out of the hospital, and its nine-member board was composed of at least six hospital officials and administrators.
On July 31, 1996, James Brophy, president of St. Luke's Hospital, sent a public records requests to the North Kansas City (NKC) Hospital Board of Trustees and Meritas for a number of documents relating to both general hospital operations and a condemnation proceeding between St. Luke's and its Smithville campus.
On August 6, 1996, Michael E. Payne of NKC Hospital granted Brophy access to a few of the records but denied access to the majority of the records requested.
On August 7, 1996 the Board of NKC Hospital filed an action in the Clay County circuit court in an attempt to validate its records denial. The board argued that it was not a public body and the records in question were not public records.
On February 21, 1997, the trial court ruled in favor of the board. St. Luke's appealed the decision.[1]
Ruling of the court
The trial court ruled in favor of NKC hospital, deciding that the hospital was not a public body under the Missouri Sunshine Law.
- The court stated that NKC Hospital and the Board of Directors were separate entities because the Board did not manage or participate in the day-to-day activities and responsibilities of the hospital.
- The court also found that the hospital was not a public government body because it did not govern anyone or anything and possessed no legislative or judicial power.
- Further, the court ruled that the documents that had been rejected were exempted under laws protecting trade secrets or rights to privacy.[1]
The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court, ruling in favor of St. Luke's Hospital.
- The court first rejected the trial court's decision that the board and the hospital were separate entities. Instead, it stated that a municipal hospital cannot separate itself from either its governing board or the municipality that established it because the function of providing health care was a function inherent in municipal government. The court saw the board as a division of municipal government and noted that hospital employees were also municipal employees.
- The court stated that the records in question were retained by the hospital and the board and consequentially the city and, thus, were public records.
- The court also rejected the trial court's decision that Meritas was not a public body, ruling that, because its primary purpose was to engage in activities established by an agreement with a public body, it was a quasi-public corporation and subject to the act.
- The court overturned all the trial court's ruling concerning the exempt nature of the documents. The court determined that the documents were not protected under federal or state anti-trust laws because St. Luke's was not monopolizing the market, nor was there any reasonable chance that the release of the documents would result in St. Luke's monopolizing. Second, the court determined that the information was not protected by Missouri Trade Secret laws because the trade secret laws only prevented information from being obtained through improper means.
- In addition, the court rejected any claim to privacy on the part of individuals or corporations who had entered into contract with NKC hospital, as contracts with government agencies carried no claim to privacy. The court wrote, "Contracts entered into by governmental entities are precisely the type of records the Sunshine Law seeks to provide to the public."
- Finally, citing Librach v. Cooper, the court established that employee contracts were not exempt as personnel records and were subject to the Sunshine Law as well.
Based on these rulings, the court concluded that the Board and Hospital were public bodies subject to the sunshine law and ordered all requested documents released.[1]
Associated cases
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of Missouri Jefferson City (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
