Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Oregon Powers of Metropolitan Service District Initiative (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Powers of Metropolitan Service District Initiative
Flag of Oregon.png
TypeStatute
OriginCitizens
TopicCounty and municipal governance
StatusNot on the ballot


An Oregon Powers of Metropolitan Service District Initiative (Petition #8) did not appear on the November 8, 2016, ballot in Oregon as an initiated state statute. The measure, upon voter approval, would have eliminated the Metropolitan Service District's (MSD) authority to designate urban and rural reserves, adopt and enforce regional land use, air quality, and water quality rules, coordinate land use planning, manage urban growth, and establish urban growth boundaries.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title would have been as follows:[1]

Eliminates metropolitan service district’s authority to adopt, coordinate, enforce land use, air/water quality plans.

Result of “Yes” Vote: “Yes” vote eliminates metropolitan service district’s authority to: manage urban growth; coordinate land use; establish urban growth boundary, urban/rural reserves; protect air/water quality.

Result of “No” Vote: “No” vote retains metropolitan service district’s authority to: manage urban growth; coordinate land use; establish urban growth boundary, urban/rural reserves; protect air/water quality.[2]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon

A petition for the initiative was submitted to the Oregon Secretary of State by Eugene Schoenheit and Lauri Hein on May 12, 2014. Proponents needed to collect 1,000 signatures to get the secretary of state's office to draft a ballot title. They collected 1,191 signatures. Petitioners disagreed with how the title was written and appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court. The court approved the attorney general's title on March 20, 2015.[3]

A total of 88,184 valid signatures were required in order for the issue to land on the 2016 ballot. The petition was withdrawn on February 9, 2016.[3]

See also

Footnotes