Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Ryan Bounds

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ryan Bounds
Image of Ryan Bounds

Education

Bachelor's

Stanford University, 1995

Law

Yale Law School, 1999


Ryan Wesley Bounds is an assistant U.S. attorney in the District of Oregon. On September 7, 2017, Bounds was nominated to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by President Donald Trump (R).[1][2][3][4] His nomination was withdrawn on July 19, 2018.[5]

Early life and education

An Oregon native, Bounds earned his bachelor's degree in psychology and political science from Stanford University in 1995. Bounds graduated from Stanford with honors and distinction and as a Phi Beta Kappa graduate. During a period of his undergraduate studies, he was an editor of The Stanford Review and was the founding editor of The Thinker. Bounds graduated from Yale Law School with his J.D. in 1999. During a period of his legal studies, he served as editor-in-chief of the Yale Law and Policy Review. He was also an editor-in-chief of a 1998 Federalist Society symposium issue of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. He was also an editor of the Yale Law Journal and vice-president of the Yale Federalist Society.[1][4][6]

Professional career

Federal judicial nomination

See also: Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Ryan Wesley Bounds
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Progress
Withdrawn 315 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: September 7, 2017
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: May 9, 2018
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: June 7, 2018 
DefeatedAConfirmed:
DefeatedAWithdrawn: July 19, 2018

Bounds was nominated by President Donald Trump (R) on September 7, 2017, to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit vacated by Diarmuid O'Scannlain. The American Bar Association rated Bounds Unanimously Qualified for the nomination. Hearings on Bounds' nomination were held before the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 9, 2018, and his nomination was reported out of committee on June 7, 2018, by a 11-10 vote.[1][2][7][8] His nomination was withdrawn on July 19, 2018, following criticism of Bounds' previous writings.[5]

Nomination withdrawn

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced Bounds' withdrawal on July 19, 2018. Bounds would have been the 24th appeals court judge and the 45th federal judge nominated by President Donald Trump (R) to be confirmed.[9]

The withdrawal came after Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) announced that he needed more information before he could support Bounds' nomination, saying, "The information that I had was insufficient for me to be a 'yes' vote, and therefore I was looking for more information that I had not yet been provided with." Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said he supported Scott's decision and indicated that he would also vote against the nominee.[10]

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said that the nominee was withdrawn because there were "objections raised that couldn’t be resolved in the short time we had, and so the White House decided to withdraw the nomination rather than have the nominee fail."[10]

Senate Judiciary Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) disagreed with Bounds' withdrawal, saying he "is eminently qualified." U.S Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) also said Bounds "didn't deserve this outcome."[11]

Opposition to Bounds' nomination

Bounds' home state senators, Ron Wyden (D) and Jeff Merkley (D) indicated in a letter to White House counsel Don McGahn that they would withhold their blue slips on Bounds' nomination. The senators wrote,[12]

We are writing today to inform you that, as previously communicated, in order to properly serve the interests of Oregonians we cannot return a blue slip on any judicial nominee that has not been approved by our bipartisan judicial selection committee.

As you are aware, in May, we wrote you to explain Oregon's long bipartisan tradition of working together to identify the most qualified candidates for judicial vacancies. As Senators charged with the task of advice and consent in the selection of candidates, we take our responsibility to identify and recommend candidates to fill Oregon judicial vacancies very seriously. We have a long history of organizing a committee charged with thoroughly vetting applicants from the Oregon legal community. At that time, we communicated our intent to begin our selection process with the goal of providing you with a list of names for you to consider. We encouraged you to direct all potential nominees to our selection committee. ...

Unfortunately, it is now apparent that you never intended to allow our longstanding process to play out. Instead, you have demonstrated that you were only interested in our input if we were willing to preapprove your preferred nominee. Disregarding this Oregon tradition returns us to the days of nepotism and patronage that harmed our courts and placed unfit judges on the bench. The judicial selection process is not a rubber stamp, and the insinuation that our offices were purposefully delaying the process is an indication of the partisanship with which you are pursuing this nomination.[13]

See also

External links

Footnotes