Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

San Francisco, California, Proposition F, Require Drug Screening for Certain Beneficiaries of the County Adult Assistance Program Initiative (March 2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
San Francisco Proposition F

Flag of California.png

Election date

March 5, 2024

Topic
Local welfare
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Initiative


San Francisco Proposition F was on the ballot as an initiative in San Francisco on March 5, 2024. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported requiring drug screening of individuals receiving County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP) benefits for individuals suspected by the city to be using illegal substances and requiring the individual to participate in treatment programs (if the treatment program is free) to continue receiving assistance benefits.

A "no" vote opposed requiring drug screening of individuals receiving County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP) benefits for individuals suspected by the city to be using illegal substances and requiring individuals to participate in free treatment programs to continue receiving benefits.


Election results

San Francisco Proposition F

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

130,214 58.13%
No 93,790 41.87%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition F was as follows:

Shall the City require single adults age 65 and under with no dependent children who receive City public assistance benefits and whom the City reasonably suspects are dependent on illegal drugs to participate in screening, evaluation and treatment for drug dependency for those adults to be eligible for most of those benefits?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Political Parties

  • San Francisco Republican Party


Arguments

  • Mayor London Breed: "Prop F, the Treatment + Accountability Measure, adds another tool to San Francisco's efforts to address the deadly drug use that is creating serious public safety hazards and fueling an overdose crisis on our streets. Two people a day are dying of overdoses from Fentanyl and other deadly drugs in San Francisco. These are sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters. Offers of treatment without accountability are not enough. We must do more to get people into treatment and save lives. But under current state law, San Francisco lacks tools to compel people into treatment. The City deploys street teams to offer voluntary services and connections to treatment. While some people do accept help, many do not, being unwilling or unable to do so. Prop F would allow the City to require single adults with substance abuse to participate in treatment in order to continue receiving cash assistance from the City and County of San Francisco. Applicants will be offered substance use treatment if they are deemed to have a substance abuse condition. These treatment programs include a range of interventions, such as: residential treatment, medical detox, medically assisted treatment, outpatient options, and abstinence-based treatment, depending on the needs of the client. Right now, San Francisco serves over 4,000 people with medication assisted treatment through medications like buprenorphine and methadone. Today, San Francisco can sign people up the same day they apply to one of these programs. Prop F strikes the right balance between compassion and accountability, to ensure that substance abuse treatment is accepted more often than it is declined."


Opposition

Arguments

  • Roma Guy, former Public Health Commissioner: "Prop F will increase the number of people experiencing homelessness in San Francisco by taking away the basic services and support systems that keep those in greatest need off the streets. Beyond more homelessness, Prop F will not solve problems with crime by making vulnerable people even more destitute. San Francisco's government already cannot meet the current demands of the overdose crisis. Experts agree we simply do not have enough treatment capacity and supportive housing available for those who want care and need treatment. Prop F defies accepted best practices for treating substance use disorder and addressing homelessness, and will have deadly results. Research by public health experts shows indisputable evidence that proposals such as Prop F lead to increased rates of return to substance use, overdose deaths, and suicide. This initiative will take away vital assistance and employment services from low-income San Franciscans. San Francisco city government must prioritize getting people experiencing substance use disorder into stable and safe housing, and supportive services that serve as a pathway to treatment, not search for new ways to deny them basic support and sustenance and force them into the streets where they will grow the ranks of the homeless population. San Francisco city leaders have failed to fulfill their promises to expand our public health system's capacity to address drug use and homelessness by not following through on their own 2022 Overdose Prevention Plan."


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

The measure was placed on the ballot through an initiative petition sponsored by San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in California

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in California.

How to vote in California


See also

Footnotes

  1. California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed August 12, 2024
  2. California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed August 13, 2024
  3. 3.0 3.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed August 13, 2024
  4. California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed August 13, 2024
  5. SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
  6. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  7. Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024
  8. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025
  9. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.