Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

San Francisco, California, Proposition O, Local Reproductive Healthcare Including Abortion Policies Initiative (November 2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
San Francisco County Proposition O

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 5, 2024

Topic
Local abortion
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Initiative


San Francisco County Proposition O was on the ballot as an initiative in San Francisco County on November 5, 2024. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:

  • Declare that San Francisco shall not "investigate or prosecute a person for having accessed or provided reproductive health care" or "assist or cooperate with such an investigation or prosecution," with certain exceptions for harms to the pregnant person;
  • Require the Department of Public Health (DPH) to maintain a website listing "pregnancy services centers in the City that provide or offer referrals for abortions or emergency contraception, as well as limited service pregnancy centers" and a non-emergency telephone number "where members of the public can obtain information about where to obtain abortions and emergency contraception;" 
  • Prohibit pregnancy services centers that receive municipal funding from "requiring abortion providers to possess or obtain additional medical qualifications beyond those required by state and federal law, in order to provide abortions;"
  • Establish the Reproductive Freedom Fund, which would receive private donations, including grants, gifts, and bequests, and distribute the funds to support "access to abortions and emergency contraception in San Francisco;" and
  • Create a new service class called Reproductive Health Clinics (RHCs) and amend zoning laws to allow RHCs throughout San Francisco, except that in residential districts, RHCs are only permitted in certain corner areas.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, known as the San Francisco Reproductive Freedom Act.


A simple majority vote was required for the ballot measure.

Election results

See also: Results for abortion-related ballot measures, 2024

San Francisco County Proposition O

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

312,914 83.84%
No 60,335 16.16%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

Proposition O declared that San Francisco shall "serve as a safe and welcoming place for patients seeking reproductive health care, to protect the rights of pregnant persons to bodily autonomy and control over their private medical decisions, and to safeguard confidential health information between patients seeking access to reproductive health care and their providers."[1]

The ballot initiative, among other provisions, declared that San Francisco shall not "investigate or prosecute a person for having accessed or provided reproductive health care" or "assist or cooperate with such an investigation or prosecution," excluding cases involving "the use of coercion or force against the pregnant person" or "criminal negligence that harmed the health of the pregnant person." Officials and employees of San Francisco, under this measure, were prohibited from sharing information with out-of-state or federal law enforcement about state-legal abortions, contraception use, in vitro fertilization, pregnancy status, or abortion decisions.[1]

The ballot initiative required the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) to maintain a website listing "pregnancy services centers in the City that provide or offer referrals for abortions or emergency contraception, as well as limited service pregnancy centers" and a non-emergency telephone number "where members of the public can obtain information about where to obtain abortions and emergency contraception." The DPH were permitted to install signs outside limited services pregnancy centers, defined as those that do not provide abortions or emergency contraception, stating that these centers do not provide abortions or emergency contraception and where those can be accessed.[1]

Starting January 1, 2025, Proposition O prohibited centers that receive municipal funding from "requiring abortion providers to possess or obtain additional medical qualifications beyond those required by state and federal law, in order to provide abortions."[1]

Proposition O established the Reproductive Freedom Fund, which received private donations, including grants, gifts, and bequests, and distribute the funds to support "access to abortions and emergency contraception in San Francisco."[1]

Proposition O created a new service class called Reproductive Health Clinics (RHCs), defined as those that provide abortions or emergency contraction and specialize in reproductive health services. The ballot initiative amended zoning laws to allow RHCs throughout San Francisco, except that in certain residential districts RHCs are only permitted as Limited Corner Commercial Use.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition O was as follows:

Shall it be City policy and law to support, protect, and expand reproductive rights and services?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

Yes on O was the campaign in support of the initiative.[2]

Supporters

Officials

Political Parties

  • San Francisco Democratic Party

Organizations

  • San Francisco Chamber of Commerce

Arguments

  • San Francisco Mayor London Breed: "Prop O - the San Francisco Reproductive Freedom Act - ensures that everyone in our city has the autonomy to make decisions about their reproductive health. San Francisco is a city known for its progressive values, inclusivity, and unwavering commitment to individual rights. Prop O embodies these principles by protecting access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including safe and legal abortion services. At a time when reproductive rights are under attack nationwide, and Donald Trump and J.D. Vance have proposed a nationwide abortion ban, it is imperative that San Francisco stands as a beacon of freedom and compassion. Prop O affirms that we all deserve the right to make private health decisions without government interference. Prop O, the San Francisco Reproductive Freedom Act, will: - Guarantee that all residents, regardless of income, have access to necessary care, by ensuring continued funding for reproductive health services. - Protect healthcare providers who deliver these essential services from political and legal attacks. - Guarantee that education on reproductive health remains unbiased, factual, and available to all. Passing Prop O is not just about preserving rights; it's about protecting lives. Comprehensive reproductive care leads to healthier families and communities. Prop O ensures that women and all people who can become pregnant are not forced into dangerous or untenable situations. I urge you to join me in supporting Prop O- the San Francisco Reproductive Freedom Act. Let's ensure that San Francisco remains a leader in upholding the dignity and rights of all residents. Thank you for standing up for freedom and justice. Vote YES on Prop O."

Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Archdiocese of San Francisco
  • Pro Life San Francisco

Arguments

  • Melanie Salazar, executive director of Pro-Life San Francisco: This measure goes way beyond "pro-life versus pro-choice." Prop O will discriminate against life-affirming healthcare facilities that San Francisco citizens depend on and lessen the number of services they can provide to the community. A yes vote would: - Require signs to be installed outside of free pro-life medical clinics in the city of San Francisco to advertise abortion centers. Nothing of the sort would be installed outside abortion centers. - Create a designated coffer for soliciting grants, donations, and budgeted tax funds to pay for elective induced abortions up to 24 weeks gestation. - Create a new website to highlight abortion businesses and disparage "limited service" centers. Because of the falsehoods Mayor Breed spread at her Prop O press conference about SF's pregnancy resource centers, we feel this website will discourage people from interacting with those facilities and receiving quality care there. Rather than calling out material aid centers or clinics by name and citing negative reviews or violations of the law, governments have been increasingly castigating all PRCs categorically. - Limit city funding from going to health facilities that refuse to abort healthy fetuses or refuse to refer people to businesses that do. This special treatment limits the expansion of services that life-affirming facilities can make available to the public. - Let new companies purchase and operate in any property zoned for non-residential use, as long as they are an abortion business. - Create an "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day" for the city. Most people who self-identify as pro-choice believe that elective abortion should be available only in the 1st trimester, but this measure would applaud doctors harming older fetuses. Together, we must reject abortion extremism by voting NO on Prop O."


Path to the ballot

This measure was added onto the ballot by San Francisco Mayor London N. Breed.[3]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in California

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in California.

How to vote in California


See also

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 San Francisco, "Proposition," accessed October 5, 2024
  2. Yes on O, "Homepage," accessed October 5, 2024
  3. The San Francisco Standard, "Abortion is on the ballot in November. The Catholic Church calls it an ‘attack’," July 11, 2024
  4. California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed August 12, 2024
  5. California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed August 13, 2024
  6. 6.0 6.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed August 13, 2024
  7. California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed August 13, 2024
  8. SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
  9. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  10. Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024
  11. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025
  12. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.