Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

School board authority in Georgia

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Education Banner Blue.png
Education Policy
Education Icon 200x200.png
Education policy topics
Overview of trends in K-12 curricula development
Impact of school choice on rural school districts
Local school board authority across the 50 states
State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools
School choice in the United States
School choice glossary

Other policy areas
Click here for coverage of other policy areas on Ballotpedia

Georgia state law makes school boards responsible for governing and managing public school districts in the state. This article details the powers and duties Georgia law grants to school boards for governing school districts and the constraints on that authority with regard to certain topics.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Georgia state law requires Georgia school boards to adopt a code of ethics board members must abide by.
  • State law prohibits Georgia school boards from delegating their powers and duties to any party.
  • State law prohibits what it calls divisive concepts from curricular instruction, including instruction describing one race as inherently superior to another race or the U.S. as fundamentally racist.
  • Georgia school boards are required to adopt open enrollment policies for their district, which includes notifying parents of the number of open seats in each school in the district before the school year begins.
  • Georgia is one of 26 states that has a Parents' Bill of Rights.

  • Types of legal and contractual constraints on school board authority

    See also: Local school board authority across the 50 states

    This page presents the results from Ballotpedia research on school board authority and constraints on that authority in all 50 states as of 2024. School board authority comes from state constitutions and state statutes and can be interpreted or specified by state regulations or court decisions. In addition to authority over district budgets, the selection of a superintendent, and administrative responsibilities, school boards have varying levels of authority over district policy on other topics depending on the state and district.

    There are several sources of legal and contractual constraints on school board policy-making authority which also vary by state or by district.

    • State laws commonly restrict or mandate school board policies on certain topics.
      • Parents' Bills of Rights, which at least 26 states have in statute to some degree, limit the policies school boards are allowed to pass.
    • State rules, guidance, and funding incentives can constrain, mandate, or influence school board policies. These include regulation from state education commissions and superintendents, executive orders from governors, or grant conditions.
    • Federal and state court rulings can dictate whether or not school district policies are compatible with state law or federal law.
    • The federal government, largely through its Department of Education, can promulgate regulations or guidance that influence district policy or make funding contingent on certain policies.
    • Collective bargaining agreements between school districts and teacher unions can create contractual constraints on the policies school boards can pass.
    • State school board associations can influence school board policy or, in some cases. enter into contracts with school boards that can limit school board policy.

    This page features the following sections:

    School board authority over district policy in Georgia

    Enabling or authorizing statute for the boards of school districts in Georgia

    See also: Enabling statute

    Georgia Statutes § 20-2-50 creates school district boards as the governing body of a school district and gives them authority to operate according to state law:[1]

    Each county of this state, exclusive of any independent school system in existence in a county, shall compose one school district and shall be confined to the control and management of a county board of education, except to the extent that area school systems are created pursuant to Article VIII, Section V, Paragraph I of the Constitution of Georgia.[2]

    Georgia Statutes § 20-2-49 creates standards for those who serve on local school boards, including that their motivation to serve on as a board member should be to improve schools and academic achievement within their district:[3]

    The General Assembly finds that local boards of education play a critical role in setting the policies that lead to the operation and success of local school systems. School board members hold special roles as trustees of public funds, including local, state, and federal funds, while they focus on the singular objective of ensuring each student in the local school system receives a quality basic education. Board duties require specialized skills and training in the performance of vision setting, policy making, approving multimillion dollar budgets, financial management, and hiring a qualified superintendent. The motivation to serve as a member of a local board of education should be the improvement of schools and academic achievement of all students. Service on a local board of education is important citizen service. Given the specialized nature and unique role of membership on a local board of education, this elected office should be characterized and treated differently from other elected offices where the primary duty is independently to represent constituent views. Local board of education members should abide by a code of conduct and conflict of interest policy modeled for their unique roles and responsibilities. And although there are many measures of the success of a local board of education, one is clearly essential: maintaining accreditation and the opportunities it allows the school system's students.[2]

    Georgia Statutes § 20-2-72 requires local school boards to adopt a code of ethics and penalties for its violations.[4]

    Georgia school boards' powers and duties

    Georgia public school boards of directors are given broad authority to administer the public schools in Georgia, though state law includes specific duties of school boards throughout. In addition to budget-related and fiscal duties, school property and facilities management, and administrative responsibilities, the specific powers and duties include

    • hiring and firing teachers and other school personnel[5]
    • developing disciplinary policy for the district[6]

    The broad authority granted to school boards to manage school districts appears in GA Code § 20-2-61:[7]

    (a) The fundamental role of a local board of education shall be to establish policy for the local school system with the focus on student achievement. The fundamental role of a local school superintendent shall be to implement the policy established by the local board. It shall not be the role of the local board of education or individual members of such board to micromanage the superintendent in executing his or her duties, but it shall be the duty of the local board to hold the local school superintendent accountable in the performance of his or her duties; provided, however, that requesting and reviewing financial data and documents shall not constitute micromanaging. No individual member shall discuss any individual personnel matter with the superintendent or other school personnel except as provided for in Code Section 20-2-943, Code Section 20-2-989.7, Code Section 20-2-989.8, Code Section 20-2-1160, Code Section 50-14-3, or Code Section 50-14-4 or as otherwise authorized by law; provided, however, that the mere referral of a personnel matter to the superintendent shall not be prohibited. Local board of education members should work together with the entire local board of education and shall not have authority as independent elected officials but shall only be authorized to take official action as members of the board as a whole. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to alter, limit, expand, or enlarge any powers, duties, or responsibilities of local boards of education, local board members, or local school superintendents.

    (b) Except as may be allowed by law, no local board of education shall delegate or attempt to delegate its policy-making functions.[2]

    Constraints on Georgia school boards' authority

    This section tracks constraints on school boards specific to Georgia as of September 2024. It features constraints on school boards' authority from state law, collective bargaining agreements, and Parents' Bills of Rights.

    Constraint on Georgia school boards' authority by topic

    This section features constraints on Georgia school boards' authority on policies related to the following topics:

    Curriculum requirements

    Georgia requires school districts to include the following specific topics in their curriculum, among others:[8]

    • The background, history, and development of the federal and state governments and Georgia county and municipal governments;
    • the history of the U.S.;
    • the history of Georgia;
    • the U.S. and Georgia Constitutions including American institutions and ideals such as the Pledge of Allegiance;
    • an alcohol and drug course;
    • reading instruction following the science of reading method;[9]
    • health and physical education; and
    • financial literacy instruction.

    Curriculum restrictions

    Georgia law prohibits instruction in public schools regarding what the law calls divisive topics. Georgia Statutes § 20-1-11 is as follows:[10]

    (a) As used in this Code section, the term:

    (1) "Divisive concepts" means any of the following concepts, including views espousing such concepts:
    (A) One race is inherently superior to another race;
    (B) The United States of America is fundamentally racist;
    (C) An individual, by virtue of his or her race, is inherently or consciously racist or oppressive toward individuals of other races;
    (D) An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race;
    (E) An individual's moral character is inherently determined by his or her race;
    (F) An individual, solely by virtue of his or her race, bears individual responsibility for actions committed in the past by other individuals of the same race;
    (G) An individual, solely by virtue of his or her race, should feel anguish, guilt, or any other form of psychological distress;
    (H) Performance-based advancement or the recognition and appreciation of character traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or have been advocated for by individuals of a particular race to oppress individuals of another race; or
    (I) Any other form of race scapegoating or race stereotyping.
    (2) "Espousing personal political beliefs" means an individual, while performing official duties as part of his or her employment or engagement with a school or local school system, intentionally encouraging or attempting to persuade or indoctrinate a student, school community member, or other school personnel to agree with or advocate for such individual's personal beliefs concerning divisive concepts.
    (3) "Race scapegoating" means assigning fault or blame to a race, or to an individual of a particular race because of his or her race. Such term includes, but is not limited to, any claim that an individual of a particular race, consciously and by virtue of his or her race, is inherently racist or is inherently inclined to oppress individuals of other races.
    (4) "Race stereotyping" means ascribing character traits, values, moral or ethical codes, status, or beliefs to an individual because of his or her race.

    (b) Each local board of education, local school superintendent, and the governing body of each charter school shall prohibit employees from discriminating against students and other employees based on race.

    (c)

    (1) Each local board of education, local school superintendent, and the governing body of each charter school shall ensure that curricula and training programs encourage employees and students to practice tolerance and mutual respect and to refrain from judging others based on race.
    (2) Each school and local school system may provide curricula or training programs that foster learning and workplace environments where all students, employees, and school community members are respected; provided, however, that any curriculum, classroom instruction, or mandatory training program, whether delivered or facilitated by school personnel or a third party engaged by a school or local school system, shall not advocate for divisive concepts.

    (d) Nothing in this Code section shall be construed or applied to:

    (1) Inhibit or violate the rights protected by the Constitutions of Georgia and the United States of America or undermine intellectual freedom and free expression;
    (2) Infringe upon the intellectual vitality of students and employees of local boards of education, local school systems, or other schools;
    (3) Prohibit a local board of education, local school system, or other school from promoting concepts such as tolerance, mutual respect, cultural sensitivity, or cultural competency; provided, however, that such efforts do not conflict with the requirements of this Code section and other applicable laws;
    (4) Prohibit a school administrator, teacher, other school personnel, or an individual facilitating a training program from responding in a professionally and academically appropriate manner and without espousing personal political beliefs to questions regarding specific divisive concepts raised by students, school community members, or participants in a training program;
    (5) Prohibit the discussion of divisive concepts, as part of a larger course of instruction, in a professionally and academically appropriate manner and without espousing personal political beliefs;
    (6) Prohibit the full and rigorous implementation of curricula, or elements of a curriculum, that are required as part of advanced placement, international baccalaureate, or dual enrollment coursework; provided, however, that such implementation is done in a professionally and academically appropriate manner and without espousing personal political beliefs;
    (7) Prohibit the use of curricula that addresses the topics of slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, or racial discrimination, including topics relating to the enactment and enforcement of laws resulting in racial oppression, segregation, and discrimination in a professionally and academically appropriate manner and without espousing personal political beliefs;
    (8) Create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against a local board of education, local school system, or other school, or the departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees, agents, or any other personnel affiliated with such local board of education, local school system, or other school; or
    (9) Prohibit a state or federal court or agency of competent jurisdiction from ordering training or other remedial action that discusses divisive concepts due to a finding of discrimination, including discrimination based on race.

    (e)

    (1) No later than August 1, 2022, each local board of education and the governing body of each charter school shall adopt a complaint resolution policy to address complaints alleging violations of any provision of subsections (b) through (d) of this Code section. The complaint resolution policy shall provide that:
    (A) A school or local school system shall not be required to respond to a complaint made pursuant to this subsection unless it is made by:
    (i) The parent of a student enrolled at the school where the alleged violation occurred;
    (ii) A student who has reached the age of majority or is a lawfully emancipated minor and who is enrolled at the school where the alleged violation occurred; or
    (iii) An individual employed as a school administrator, teacher, or other school personnel at the school where the alleged violation occurred;
    (B) The complaint shall first be submitted in writing to the principal of the school where the alleged violation occurred;
    (C) The complaint shall provide a reasonably detailed description of the alleged violation;
    (D)
    (i) Within five school days of receiving such written complaint, the school principal or a designee of the charter school or local school system shall review the complaint and take reasonable steps to investigate the allegations in the complaint;
    (ii) Within ten school days of receiving the complaint, unless another schedule is mutually agreed to by the complainant and the school principal or the designee of the charter school or local school system, the school principal or such designee shall confer with the complainant and inform the complainant whether a violation occurred, in whole or in part, and, if such a violation was found to have occurred, what remedial steps have been or will be taken; provided, however, that the confidentiality of student or personnel information shall not be violated; and
    (iii) Following such conference, within three school days of a request by the complainant, the school principal or the designee of the charter school or local school system shall provide to the complainant a written summary of the findings of the investigation and a statement of remedial measures, if any; provided, however, that such written response shall not disclose any confidential student or personnel information;
    (E) The determinations provided for in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph shall be reviewed by the governing body of a state charter school or the local school superintendent or his or her designee, as applicable, within ten school days of receiving a written request for such review by the complainant addressed to the governing body of a state charter school or the local school superintendent, as applicable; provided, however, that confidential student or personnel matters shall not be subject to review pursuant to this subparagraph; and
    (F)
    (i) The local school superintendent's decision following the review provided for in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph shall be subject to review by the local board of education as provided in Code Section 20-2-1160; provided, however, that confidential student or personnel matters shall not be subject to review pursuant to this division; and
    (ii) The decision of the governing body of a state charter school following the review provided for in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph shall be subject to review by the State Charter Schools Commission, whereupon the State Charter Schools Commission shall take appropriate remedial measures, including, but not limited to, revocation of a state charter school's charter; provided, however, that confidential student or personnel matters shall not be subject to review pursuant to this division.
    (2) Following a decision by a local board of education regarding a complaint made pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, any party aggrieved by the decision of the local board of education shall have the right to appeal such decision to the State Board of Education for a hearing as provided in Code Section 20-2-1160.
    (3) The State Board of Education shall, after hearing an appeal brought pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection, make written findings regarding whether any violations of any provision of subsections (b) through (d) of this Code section occurred at a school in such school system. If the State Board of Education finds that one or more such violations occurred, it shall direct the Department of Education to develop a corrective action plan to be provided to the local school system within ten days of such finding, and the local school system shall have 30 days to implement the corrective action plan. If the State Board of Education finds that such local school system has not implemented the corrective action plan:
    (A)
    (i) In cases where the local school system at issue has been granted one or more waivers as provided in Article 4 of Chapter 2 of this title, Code Section 20-2-244, or Code Section 20-2-2065, the State Board of Education shall order the immediate suspension of one or more waivers included in the local school system's contract with the State Board of Education providing for such waivers;
    (ii) The State Board of Education shall exercise discretion in determining which waivers shall be subject to such order of suspension and shall, as may be reasonable and practicable, narrowly tailor such order to address specific violations of provisions of subsections (b) through (d) of this Code section; and
    (iii) An order suspending a local school system's waivers pursuant to division (i) of this subparagraph shall be in effect for no less than 12 months from the date of such order and, if the remainder of the current term of such local school system's contract with the State Board of Education providing for waivers is greater than 12 months, then no longer than such remainder; and
    (B) In cases where the local school system at issue has not been granted a waiver as provided in Article 4 of Chapter 2 of this title, Code Section 20-2-244, or Code Section 20-2-2065, the State Board of Education shall refer the matter to the State School Superintendent to determine whether to exercise his or her suspension authority as provided in Code Section 20-2-34.
    (4) No later than July 1, 2022, the State Board of Education shall promulgate a model policy to assist schools and local school systems with establishing a complaint resolution process that meets the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection. The Department of Education shall develop guidance for schools and local school systems for use when determining whether violations of subsections (b) through (d) of this Code section have occurred. The Department of Education shall be authorized to revise such guidance from time to time.
    (5) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit any cause of action available at law or in equity to a complainant who is aggrieved by a decision of a local board of education, the governing body of a charter school, or the State Charter Schools Commission made pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of this subsection.

    (f)

    (1) Any individual described in divisions (e)(1)(A)(i) through (iii) of this Code section shall have the right at any time, including prior to filing a complaint as provided in subsection (e) of this Code section, to request, in writing, from the local school superintendent or school principal nonconfidential records which he or she reasonably believes may substantiate a complaint under this Code section. The local school superintendent or school principal shall produce such records for inspection within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receipt of a request. In those instances where some, but not all, of the records requested are available for inspection within three business days, the local school superintendent or school principal shall make available within that period such records that are available for inspection. In any instance where some or all of such records are unavailable within three business days of receipt of the request, and such information exists, the local school superintendent or school principal shall, within such time period, provide the requester with a description of such records and a timeline for when the records will be available for inspection and shall provide the records or access thereto as soon as practicable but in no case later than 30 days after receipt of the request.
    (2) If the local school superintendent or school principal denies a parent's request for records or does not provide existing responsive records within 30 days, the parent may appeal such denial or failure to respond to the local board of education or charter school governing board. The local board of education or charter school governing board must place such appeal on the agenda for its next public meeting. If it is too late for such appeal to appear on the next meeting's agenda, the appeal must be included on the agenda for the subsequent meeting.
    (3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit any cause of action available at law or in equity to a parent who is aggrieved by a decision of a local board of education or the governing body of a charter school made pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection.

    (g) This Code section shall not be subject to waivers pursuant to Code Section 20-2-82 for a strategic waivers school system; Code Section 20-2-244 for a local board of education; Code Section 20-2-2063.2 for a charter system; or Code Section 20-2-2065 for a charter school established pursuant to Article 31 or Article 31A of this chapter, a charter system, or schools within a charter system.[2]

    Federal law and guidance

    Book bans, removals, and restrictions

    Georgia school boards have the authority to remove books from school libraries. School boards decide whether or not to remove books challenged by the public from school libraries and classrooms.[12]

    Case law:
    The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed local school boards' authority to remove school books in Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico in 1982 but held that school library books are distinct from curricular books, which school boards have more authority to regulate. The ruling held that school boards are charged with inculcating community values and may make curricular decisions accordingly. In Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp. in 1980, the Supreme Court held that school boards had discretionary power over curriculum, textbooks, and other educational matters but could not impose religious creeds or "permanently the student’s ability to investigate matters that arise in the natural course of intellectual inquiry,” according to the opinion.[13][14][15]

    Federal guidance


    Parental notification

    Georgia requires parental notification in the following circumstances:

    • The local school board considers adjusting or adding instructional material to the district curriculum.[17]
    • The student is slated to receive instruction in sex education. Parents must be notified before hand to be given the chance to opt their child out of sex education.[18]

    Georgia school boards are required to adopt open enrollment policies for their district, which includes notifying parents of the number of open seats in each school in the district before the school year begins.[19]

    Case law: The United States Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor on June 27, 2025, that Montgomery County Board of Education's introduction of LGBTQ+ related storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, placed an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion.[20]

    Discipline

    See also: How does Georgia compare to other states on school board authority over disciplinary policy?

    Georgia is one of 47 states that gives school boards authority over district disciplinary policy.

    The text of Georgia Statutes § 20-2-735 is as follows:[6]

    (a) No later than July 1, 2000, each local board of education shall adopt policies designed to improve the student learning environment by improving student behavior and discipline. These policies shall provide for the development of age-appropriate student codes of conduct containing standards of behavior, a student support process, a progressive discipline process, and a parental involvement process. The State Board of Education shall establish minimum standards for such local board policies. The Department of Education shall make available for utilization by each local board of education model student codes of conduct, a model student support process, a model progressive discipline process, and a model parental involvement process.

    (b) Student standards of behavior developed pursuant to this subpart shall be designed to create the expectation that students will behave themselves in such a way so as to facilitate a learning environment for themselves and other students, respect each other and school district employees, obey student behavior policies adopted by the local board of education, and obey student behavior rules established by individual schools.

    (c) Student support processes developed pursuant to this subpart shall be designed to create the expectation that the process of disciplining students will include due consideration, as appropriate in light of the severity of the behavioral problem, of student support services that may help the student address behavioral problems and that may be available through the school, the school system, other public entities, or community organizations.

    (d) Progressive discipline processes developed pursuant to this subpart shall be designed to create the expectation that the degree of discipline will be in proportion to the severity of the behavior leading to the discipline, that the previous discipline history of the student being disciplined and other relevant factors will be taken into account, and that all due process procedures required by federal and state law will be followed.

    (e) Parental involvement processes developed pursuant to this subpart shall be designed to create the expectation that parents and guardians, teachers, and school administrators will work together to improve and enhance student behavior and academic performance and will communicate freely their concerns about and actions in response to student behavior that detracts from the learning environment. The student code of conduct developed pursuant to this Code section shall encourage parents and guardians to inform their children of the consequences, including potential criminal penalties, of underage sexual conduct and crimes for which a minor can be tried as an adult.

    (f) It is the policy of this state that it is preferable to reassign disruptive students to alternative educational settings rather than to suspend or expel such students from school. [2]

    Federal guidance

    School board elections

    See also: Rules governing school board election dates and timing in Georgia, How does Georgia compare to other states on school board authority over election timing?

    Georgia is one of 42 states in which school boards do not have authority over the timing of school board elections because state or municipal laws determine school board election dates.

    Click here to read about the laws governing school board elections in Georgia.

    Public school choice and open enrollment

    See also: School choice in Georgia

    Local school boards in Georgia are required to adopt policies to facilitate intradistrict enrollment. Though there is no statewide requirement for school boards to adopt policies for interdistrict enrollment, local school boards can approve or deny the transfer of students between schools across district lines:[19][22]

    Section 20-2-2131 - Enrollment of students in school to which not originally assigned; procedure; annual notification; exception

    (a)
    (1) Beginning in school year 2009-2010, the parent of a student enrolled in a public elementary or secondary school in this state may elect to enroll such student in a public school that is located within the school system in which the student resides other than the one to which the student has been assigned by the local board of education if such school has classroom space available after its assigned students have been enrolled. The parent shall assume the responsibility and cost of transportation of the student to and from the school.

    (2) No later than July 1, 2009, each local school system shall establish a universal, streamlined process available to all students to implement the transfer requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection.

    (3) A student who transfers to another school pursuant to this subsection may, at his or her election, continue to attend such school until the student completes all grades of the school.

    (4) This subsection shall not be construed to affect any student currently attending a school other than the school to which the student has been assigned by the local board of education pursuant to a transfer authorized under the federal No Child Left Behind Act (P.L. 107-110).

    (b) The department shall establish a model universal, streamlined process to implement the transfer provisions of this Code section. Each local board of education shall adopt a universal, streamlined transfer process that includes, at a minimum, such state model. Such local process shall include a deadline for submitting transfer requests.

    (c) Each local school system shall annually notify prior to each school year the parents of each student by letter, electronic means, or by such other reasonable means in a timely manner of the options available to parents under this article, including all relevant dates and deadlines. As a part of such annual notification process, each local school system shall post in a prominent location on its website the information required pursuant to this Code section.

    (d) The local school system shall notify parents by July 1 of each year which schools have available space and to which of these schools parents may choose to request a transfer for their children.

    (e) This Code section shall not apply to charter schools; provided, however, that each local board of education shall adopt a universal, streamlined transfer process that allows for transfers pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of Code Section 20-2-2066.

    (f) This Code section shall not apply to newly opened schools with available classroom space for a period of four years after the school opens.

    Section 20-2-293 - [Effective 7/1/2025] Student attending school in system other than system of student's residence

    (a)
    (1) The provisions of this article and other statutes to the contrary notwithstanding, the State Board of Education shall provide a procedure whereby a student shall be permitted to attend and to be included as an enrolled student in the public schools of a local unit of administration other than the local unit of administration wherein the student resides for the purpose of allotting state funds under this article, notwithstanding absence of an agreement between the two local units and a refusal by the board of education of the local unit wherein the student resides to approve voluntarily such transfer of the student to the public schools of the other local unit; provided, however, that the board of education of the local unit is willing to receive and to permit such student to enroll in and to attend the public schools of such local unit. The state board shall adopt such rules, regulations, and policies as may be necessary for implementation of this Code section. Grant or refusal of permission for students to attend such schools, for the purpose of permitting state funds to follow such students, shall be subject only to approval of the enrolling student and the local unit of administration in which the student seeks to enroll. Local units of administration may contract with each other for the care, education, and transportation of students and for such other activities as they may be authorized by law to perform.

    (2) Beginning July 1, 2026, and continuing thereafter, if a local unit of administration enrolls a student pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection and requires the student to pay tuition, the amount of tuition such local unit of administration may charge to such student shall not exceed total revenues less federal revenues less state revenues per full-time equivalent student for the local unit of administration that enrolls such student.

    (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section or any other general law, and except as provided by the General Assembly by local law, a student shall be allowed to attend and be enrolled in the school in which a parent or guardian of such student is a full-time teacher, paraprofessional, or other employee, notwithstanding the fact that such school is not located in the local unit of administration in which such student resides. Each local unit of administration shall be authorized to allow a student to attend and be enrolled in the school in which a parent or guardian of such student is a part-time teacher, paraprofessional, or other employee who works for at least 20 hours per school week on average measured monthly, notwithstanding the fact that such school is not located in the local unit of administration in which such student resides. Each local unit of administration of this state shall provide procedures to implement the provisions of this subsection."

    Charter schools

    See also: Charter schools in Georgia, How does Georgia compare to other states on school board authority over charter schools?

    Georgia is one of 36 states that grant school boards at least some authority over whether charter schools are issued in their district.

    Charter school petitioners must submit their applications to the local school board of the area in which the school is to be located, as well as the State Charter School Commission (SCSC) of Georgia. Local school boards must approve a petition that complies with the rules, regulations, policies, and procedures in Georgia Statutes 20-2-2063. If a local school board denies an application, information on why they denied it is relayed to the SCSC to be considered during their review of the application. The SCSC has the final say in approving or denying a charter application:[23][24][25]

    Section 20-2-2064 - Approval or denial of petition

    (a) A charter petitioner seeking to create a conversion charter school must submit a petition to the local board of the local school system in which the proposed charter school will be located. The local board must by a majority vote approve or deny a petition no later than 90 days after its submission unless the petitioner requests an extension; provided, however, that a denial of a petition by a local board shall not preclude the submission to the local board of a revised petition that addresses deficiencies cited in the denial; and provided, further, that the local board shall not act upon a petition for a conversion charter school, including, but not limited to, a conversion charter for a high school cluster, until such petition:

    (1)
    (A) Has been freely agreed to, by secret ballot, by a majority of the faculty and instructional staff members of the petitioning local school at a public meeting called with two weeks' advance notice for the purpose of deciding whether to submit the petition to the local board for its approval; and

    (B) Has been freely agreed to, by secret ballot, by a majority of the parents or guardians of students enrolled in the petitioning local school present at a public meeting called with two weeks' advance notice for the purpose of deciding whether to submit the petition to the local board for its approval; or

    (2) If for a high school cluster, has been approved by a majority of the school councils in the high school cluster and has been freely agreed to, by secret ballot, by at least 60 percent of the combined vote of the faculty and instructional staff members of the high school cluster and the parents or guardians of students who reside in the attendance zone of such high school cluster present at a public meeting called with two weeks' advance notice for the purpose of deciding whether to submit the petition to the local board for its approval. Each school council within the high school cluster shall appoint two representatives to a committee that shall conduct the vote. This subsection shall not apply to a system charter school petitioning to be a conversion charter school.

    (b) A charter petitioner seeking to create a start-up charter school must submit a petition to the local board of the local school system in which the proposed charter school will be located. The local board must by a majority vote approve or deny a petition no later than 90 days after its submission unless the petitioner requests an extension. A denial of a petition by a local board shall not preclude the submission to the local board of a revised petition that addresses deficiencies cited in the denial.

    (c) A system charter school's school council or governing council, as applicable, may petition to become a conversion charter school. The petition shall be submitted to the local board of the charter system in which the school is located. The local board must by a majority vote approve or deny a petition no later than 90 days after its submission unless the petitioner requests an extension; provided, however, that a denial of a petition by a local board shall not preclude the submission to the local board of a revised petition that addresses deficiencies cited in the denial.

    (d) A local board shall approve a petition that complies with the rules, regulations, policies, and procedures promulgated in accordance with Code Section 20-2-2063 and the provisions of this title and is in the public interest. If a local board denies a petition, it must within 60 days specifically state the reasons for the denial, list all deficiencies with respect to Code Section 20-2-2063, and provide a written statement of the denial to the charter petitioner and the state board.

    (e) The state board or the Charter Advisory Committee, if directed by the state board to do so, may mediate between the local board and a charter petitioner whose petition was denied to assist in resolving issues which led to denial of the petition by the local board.

    691-2-.02 State Charter School Petitions

    (5) State Charter School Petition Review Process. The SCSC staff shall review each state charter school petition that is submitted to ensure that all state charter schools authorized by the SCSC are consistent with state education goals. The SCSC may establish multiple petition review cycles and limit a cycle to a specific type of petitioner, including, but not limited to, petitioners seeking to replicate or expand an existing charter school. The SCSC review process includes a review for legal compliance, a substantive petition review, and an interview with charter school’s representatives. A local board of education may also express opposition or support for the charter petition during the state charter school petition review process.

    ...

    (d) Position of the Local Board of Education. A local board of education may express its support or opposition of a state charter school petition to the SCSC, including the reasons it chose to deny the charter petition and the specific deficiencies in the charter petition that resulted in its denial. The local board of education may express its position in its written notification of denial to the charter school petitioner or through a separate written communication to the SCSC. All written communications of the local board of education expressing its support or opposition of a state charter school petition shall be included with the state charter school petition application for consideration by the SCSC and its staff.

    ... (8) Official Action.
    (a) The SCSC may approve, deny, renew, or nonrenew state charter school petitions.


    160-4-9-.05 CHARTER SCHOOLS PETITION PROCESS.

    (1) CHARTER PETITION PROCESS.

    (a) LETTERS OF INTENT. All applicants, including renewal applicants, who intend to submit a charter petition for local board of education (local board) consideration, shall use the Office of Charter School Compliance (OCSC) template to submit a letter of intent to both the OCSC and to the appropriate local board(s) at least six (6) months prior to the date on which the petition will be submitted to the OCSC. Petitioners should consult the OCSC website and consult with the applicable local school district(s) (local district) for timelines and requirements. Failure to submit a letter of intent shall not preclude an applicant from submitting a petition provided the applicant requests and receives a waiver for the letter of intent from both the OCSC and local district(s).

    (b) CHARTER PETITION TIMELINE. By September 1 of each year, every local district shall publish a timeline for submitting and reviewing start-up petitions on its respective website. The timeline must:

    1. Establish a final petition submission deadline that is on or before January 1, unless the OCSC approves an alternative deadline in advance.

    2. Identify the time frame between when the local board approves the charter petition and when the charter school is expected to begin serving students (preopening period). The pre-opening period shall be at least 6 months.

    3. Require the local board to, by majority vote, approve or deny a petition no later than June 30.

    Cellphone bans

    See also: How does Georgia compare to other states on cellphone laws?

    Georgia is one of 26 states with state laws or executive orders prohibiting or limiting cell phones in classrooms and/or schools, including through requiring school boards to pass certain policies. Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) signed HB340 on May 9, 2025, requiring school districts in the state to adopt policies prohibiting cellphone access during the school day for elementary and middle schools.[26]

    Collective bargaining agreements

    Teacher union collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) can constrain school board authority. Teacher CBAs are agreements between a school district and a teachers’ union to establish rights and other contract details for public school employees. CBAs do not have the force of law, but are contractually binding for a set period of time. Within the time set out in the agreement, the school board must comply with the stipulations that were agreed to in the contract. In this way, CBAs can constrain school board authority by giving teachers authority over curriculum, prohibiting school boards from banning books, and establishing certain student or parental rights. They can also determine rights and protections for educators, and conditions for students (such as required recess periods or the amount of standardized testing), among other provisions.

    CBAs vary greatly within and across states in size, topics covered, and constraints they put on school boards. Not all states allow teachers to bargain collectively. As of January 2022, 35 states and the District of Columbia guaranteed K-12 teachers some right to bargain collectively, and six states prohibited public-sector employee collective bargaining by law, which includes public school teachers. The other nine states have no statewide bargaining framework, but local jurisdictions within these states can grant bargaining rights if they choose.[27][28]

    Georgia school boards are not legally allowed to engage in collective bargaining agreements with school employees.

    Parents' bill of rights

    See also: How does Georgia compare to other states on Parents' Bills of Rights?

    Georgia is one of 26 states that has a Parents' Bill of Rights.

    The statute holds that parents have the right to review all instructional materials intended for use in the classroom, prohibit photographs, videos, or voice recordings of their child, and to opt their child out of sex education, among other provisions. The text is as follows:[18]

    (a) This Code section shall be known and may be cited as the "Parents' Bill of Rights."

    (b) The General Assembly finds that it is a fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their minor children. The General Assembly further finds that important information relating to a minor child should not be withheld, either inadvertently or purposefully, from his or her parent, including information relating to the minor child's education.

    (c) As used in this Code section, the term:

    (1) "Governing body" shall have the same meaning as provided in subsection (a) of Code Section 20-2-167.1.
    (2) "Instructional material" means instructional materials and content, as defined by the State Board of Education pursuant to Code Section 20-2-1010, and locally approved instructional materials and content, as defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 20-2-1017.
    (3) "Minor child" means a person who is less than 18 years of age and who has not been emancipated by operation of law or by court order pursuant to Code Section 15-11-727 or as otherwise provided by law.
    (4) "Parent" means a person who has legal authority to act on behalf of a minor child as a natural or adoptive parent or a legal guardian.
    (5) "Review period" means the first two weeks of each nine-week grading period of the school year; provided, however, that for schools that do not implement nine-week grading periods, the term 'review period' means the first two weeks of each grading period of the school year.

    (d) No state or local government entity, governing body, or any officer, employee, or agent thereof may infringe on the fundamental right of a parent to direct the upbringing and education of his or her minor child without demonstrating that such action is reasonable and necessary to achieve a compelling state interest and that such action is narrowly tailored and is not otherwise served by less restrictive means.

    (e)
    (1) All parental rights are reserved to the parent of a minor child in this state without obstruction or interference from a state or local government entity, governing body, or any officer, employee, or agent thereof, including, but not limited to:

    (A) The right to direct the upbringing and the moral or religious training of his or her minor child;
    (B) The right to review all instructional materials intended for use in the classroom of his or her minor child;
    (C) The right to apply to enroll his or her minor child in a public school or, as an alternative to public education, a private school, including a religious school, a home study program, or other available options, as authorized by law and subject to applicable enrollment requirements;
    (D) The right to access and review all records relating to his or her minor child, including, but not limited to, current grade reports and attendance records, unless otherwise prohibited by law;
    (E) The right to access information relating to promotion and retention policies and high school graduation requirements;
    (F) The right to provide written notice that photographs or video or voice recordings of his or her child are not permitted, subject to applicable public safety and security exceptions; and
    (G)
    (i) The right to request, in writing, from the local school superintendent or school principal the information provided for in this Code section. The local school superintendent or school principal shall produce such information for inspection within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receipt of a request. In those instances where some, but not all, information requested is available for inspection within three business days, the local school superintendent or school principal shall make available within that period such information that is available for inspection. In any instance where some or all of such information is unavailable within three business days of receipt of the request, and such information exists, the local school superintendent or school principal shall, within such time period, provide the requester with a description of such information and a timeline for when the information will be available for inspection and shall provide the information or access thereto as soon as practicable but in no case later than 30 days of receipt of the request.
    (ii) If the local school superintendent or school principal denies a parent's request for information or does not provide existing responsive information within 30 days, the parent may appeal such denial or failure to respond to the governing body. The governing body must place such appeal on the agenda for its next public meeting. If it is too late for such appeal to appear on the next meeting's agenda, the appeal must be included on the agenda for the subsequent meeting.
    (iii) A parent aggrieved by the decision of the governing body may appeal such decision to the State Board of Education as provided in subsection (b) of Code Section 20-2-1160.

    (2) Unless such rights have been waived or terminated as provided by law, parents have inalienable rights that are more comprehensive than those listed in paragraph (1) of this subsection. This Code section does not prescribe all rights of parents. Unless otherwise required by law, the rights of a parent of a minor child shall not be limited or denied.

    (f) Each governing body shall, in consultation with parents, teachers, and administrators, develop and adopt a policy or regulation to promote parental involvement in the public schools. Such policy or regulation shall be posted on each governing body's public website, and a copy of such policy or regulation shall be available for review on site upon request by a parent. Such policy or regulation shall include:

    (1) Procedures for a parent to review records relating to his or her minor child;
    (2)
    (A) Procedures for a parent to learn about his or her minor child's courses of study, including, but not limited to, parental access to instructional materials intended for use in the classroom. Instructional materials intended for use in his or her minor child's classroom shall be made available for parental review during the review period. If such instructional materials are not made available by a school or local school system for review online, then they shall be made available for review on site upon a parent's request made during the review period.
    (B) Procedures for a parent to object to instructional materials intended for use in his or her minor child's classroom or recommended by his or her minor child's teacher;
    (3) Procedures for a parent to withdraw his or her minor child from the school's prescribed course of study in sex education if the parent provides a written objection to his or her minor child's participation. Such procedures must provide for a parent to be notified in advance of such course content so that he or she may withdraw his or her minor child from the course; and
    (4) Procedures for a parent to provide written notice that photographs or video or voice recordings of his or her child are not permitted, subject to applicable public safety and security exceptions.

    (g) This Code section does not and shall not be construed to:

    (1) Authorize a parent of a minor child in this state to engage in conduct that is unlawful or to abuse or neglect his or her minor child in violation of the law;
    (2) Prohibit a judge or officer of a court of competent jurisdiction, law enforcement officer, or any agent of a state or local government entity that is responsible for child welfare from acting in his or her official capacity within the reasonable and prudent scope of his or her authority;
    (3) Prohibit a court of competent jurisdiction from issuing an order that is otherwise permitted by law; or
    (4) Apply to a parental action or decision that would end life.

    (h) This Code section shall not be subject to waiver pursuant to Code Section 20-2-82 for a strategic waivers school system, Code Section 20-2-2063.2 for a charter system, Code Section 20-2-2065 for a charter school, or Code Section 20-2-244. OCGA § 20-2-786[2]


    How does Georgia compare to other states?

    This section compares Georgia's school board authority and constraints with those of other states on select topics. These topics include authority over discipline policy, school board election timing, charter schools, cellphone use policy, as well as constraints on school boards' authority from Parents' Bills of Rights.

    Book bans, removals, and restrictions

    Twenty-two (22) states have no laws regulating the curation of school library books. Twenty-eight (28) states, however, have passed laws restricting school board authority over school library book curation. These laws typically fall into one of the following categories:

    • Twelve states require school boards to develop a policy for the removal of books, including creating a way for the public to challenge school library books.
    • Ten states prohibit school boards from removing books on the grounds that they represent specific ideologies or perspectives.
    • Six states prohibit books if they contain specific material, including sexual content or anything deemed harmful to minors.
    • Five states require school boards to establish local boards to review challenges to library books.
    • Two states require school boards to allow parents to view a catalogue of books.

    Some states have adopted multiple types of these policies.

    Discipline

    • School boards in 47 states have authority over disciplinary policy in their district.
    • School boards in two states have authority over disciplinary policy for specific circumstances, such as suspension, expulsion, or bullying.
    • Individual schools in one state create their own disciplinary policy.

    School board elections

    School boards' authority over the timing of school board elections varies by state.

    • School boards in 42 states do not have authority over election timing;
    • School boards in five states can choose from limited options when to hold school board elections;
    • School boards in two states can choose from a date range when to hold school board elections;
    • The school board in Hawaii is not elected.

    The map below shows the types of authority school boards in the states have to determine the timing of school board elections.

    Charter schools

    See also: Charter schools in the United States

    Some school boards in the U.S. are authorized to approve or deny applications for charter schools in their district, while state boards of education hold the authority in other states. In some states, school boards can authorize charter schools, but there are other entities besides school boards that can also authorize charter schools or to which a school board decision can be appealed.

    • 10 states do not authorize school boards to make decisions on whether to approve new charter schools in their districts.
    • 36 states do authorize school boards to approve new charter schools in their districts, deny approval to new charter schools, or both.
    • 3 states do not have laws governing charter school authorization.
    • 1 state allows school districts to apply to the state board of education to be a charter school district.

    State cellphone laws

    See also: State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools

    In most states, school boards or superintendents often set policies on cellphones in public schools. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), around 76% of schools said they banned the non-academic use of cellphones or smartphones during school hours during the 2021-22 school year, down from 91% in 2010.[29]

    Beginning with Florida in 2023, some states enacted laws or policies to regulate student cellphone usage in public schools. Twenty-six (26) states had statewide laws or policies restricting cellphone use in K-12 classrooms or schools as of June 2025. Four states had requirements for all school district boards to adopt a policy on cellphones but without specific requirements for those policies. Five other states had policies encouraging school districts to establish restrictions on cellphone use in the classroom.


    Parents' Bill of Rights

    See also: Parents' Bill of Rights in education

    If state law explicitly provides certain rights to parents, it can constrain the policy-making authority of school boards. These sections of statute are often referred to within statute and are categorized here as Parents' Bills of Rights. In some states, they are education-specific, regarding the rights a parent has to be involved in their child's public education. Common examples include notification requirements, opt-out rights, and records access. Other Parents' Bills of Rights are more general, commonly affording parents a right to direct the upbringing of their child.

    • 26 states have enacted a statewide Parents' Bill of Rights
    • 24 states have not enacted a Parents' Bill of Rights.

    Noteworthy events

    See also: Overview of trends in K-12 curricula development
    • Georgia implements science of reading curriculum requirements (2025): Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) signed the Georgia Early Literacy and Dyslexia Act on April 28, 2025, requiring school districts to use the science of reading method when teaching reading and literacy K-3 classrooms.[30]
    • Georgia school board bans books after firing teacher (2023): The Cobby County School District, Georgia, removed two books—Flamer by Mike Curato and Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews— from 20 school libraries on August 21, 2023, for “highly inappropriate, sexually explicit content,” according to the Associated Press. The decision followed the school board firing a teacher on August 17, 2023, for reading a book on gender identity to her fifth-grade class. [31]

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-50 (2023)," accessed January 23, 2025
    2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    3. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-49 (2023)," accessed January 23, 2025
    4. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-72 (2023)," accessed January 23, 2025
    5. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-943," accessed January 23, 2025
    6. 6.0 6.1 Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-735 (2023)," accessed January 23, 2025
    7. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-61," accessed January 23, 2025
    8. Law.Justia.com, "§§ 20-2-140 — 20-2-149.4," accessed January 23, 2025
    9. Legiscan, "GA HB307," accessed April 30, 2025
    10. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-1-11," accessed January 23, 2025
    11. The White House, "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling," accessed March 14, 2025
    12. Casetext.com, "Section 20-2-324.6 - Complaint resolution policy for materials 'harmful to minors.'" accessed January 23, 2025
    13. Education Law Center, Pennsylvania, "Challenging book bans: What can you do," September 18, 2024
    14. Law.Justia.com, "Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982)," September 18, 2024
    15. Law.Justia.com, "Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp., 631 F.2d 1300 (7th Cir. 1980)," October 11, 2024
    16. U.S. Department of Education, "U.S. Department of Education Ends Biden’s Book Ban Hoax," accessed January 28, 2025
    17. Law.Justia.com, "GA Code § 20-2-1017 (2023)," accessed January 23, 2025
    18. 18.0 18.1 Casetext.com, "Section 20-2-786 - Parents' Bill of Rights," accessed January 23, 2025
    19. 19.0 19.1 Casetext.com, "Section 20-2-2131 - Enrollment of students in school to which not originally assigned; procedure; annual notification; exception," accessed January 24, 2025
    20. The United States Supreme Court, "Mahmoud et al. v. Taylor et al." accessed July 7, 2025
    21. The White House, "Reinstating Common Sense School Discipline Policies," April 30, 2025
    22. Casetext.com, "Section 20-2-293 - [Effective 7/1/2025 Student attending school in system other than system of student's residence," accessed January 24, 2025]
    23. State Charter School Commission of Georgia, "691-2-.02 State Charter School Petitions," accessed January 24, 2025
    24. Casetext.com, "Section 20-2-2064 - Approval or denial of petition," accessed January 24, 2025
    25. Georgia Department of Education, "160-4-9-.05 Charter Schools Petition Process." accessed August 13, 2025
    26. BillTrack50, "Distraction-Free Education Act," accessed May 12, 2025
    27. National Education Association, "Collective Bargaining: What it is and How it Works", accessed October 3, 2024.
    28. National Education Association, "The Benefits of Collective Bargaining in Education", accessed October 3, 2024
    29. National Center for Education Statistics, "Percentage of public schools with various safety and security measures: Selected school years, 1999-2000 through 2021-22," accessed August 8, 2024
    30. Legiscan, "GA HB 307," accessed April 30, 2025
    31. Associated Press, "Georgia school district is banning books, citing sexual content, after firing a teacher," September 8, 2023