Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
School board authority in Vermont

Education Policy | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Education policy topics | |
• Overview of trends in K-12 curricula development • Impact of school choice on rural school districts • Local school board authority across the 50 states • State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools • School choice in the United States • School choice glossary
| |
Other policy areas | |
Click here for coverage of other policy areas on Ballotpedia |
Vermont state law makes school boards responsible for governing and managing public school districts in the state. This article details the powers and duties Vermont law grants to school boards for governing school districts and the constraints on that authority with regard to certain topics.
Types of legal and contractual constraints on school board authority
This page presents the results from Ballotpedia research on school board authority and constraints on that authority in all 50 states as of 2024. School board authority comes from state constitutions and state statutes and can be interpreted or specified by state regulations or court decisions. In addition to authority over district budgets, the selection of a superintendent, and administrative responsibilities, school boards have varying levels of authority over district policy on other topics depending on the state and district.
There are several sources of legal and contractual constraints on school board policy-making authority which also vary by state or by district.
- State laws commonly restrict or mandate school board policies on certain topics.
- Parents' Bills of Rights, which at least 26 states have in statute to some degree, limit the policies school boards are allowed to pass.
- State rules, guidance, and funding incentives can constrain, mandate, or influence school board policies. These include regulation from state education commissions and superintendents, executive orders from governors, or grant conditions.
- Federal and state court rulings can dictate whether or not school district policies are compatible with state law or federal law.
- The federal government, largely through its Department of Education, can promulgate regulations or guidance that influence district policy or make funding contingent on certain policies.
- Collective bargaining agreements between school districts and teacher unions can create contractual constraints on the policies school boards can pass.
- State school board associations can influence school board policy or, in some cases. enter into contracts with school boards that can limit school board policy.
This page features the following sections:
- Vermont law on school boards' authority over district policy. This section features the statutes in Vermont law that establish, enable, or define local school district boards.
- Constraints on Vermont school boards' authority. This section provides an overview of constraints on the school boards' authority in Vermont. It contains information on the constraints by the following topics:
- Collective bargaining agreements
- Parents' bill of rights
- How does Vermont compare to other states?
- Noteworthy Events. This section tracks noteworthy events related to school boards' authority in Vermont.
School board authority over district policy in Vermont
Enabling or authorizing statute for the boards of school districts in Vermont
- See also: Enabling statute
Vermont Statute 16 § 11 defines school boards as the managers of the schools in the district:[1]
|
Vermont school boards' powers and duties
Vermont public school boards of directors are given 26 specific duties or powers to administer the public schools in the Vermont. In addition to budget-related and fiscal duties, school property and facilities management, and administrative responsibilities, the specific powers and duties include:
- regulate or prohibit firearms or other dangerous or deadly weapons on school premises
- provide schools in their district with textbooks, learning materials, equipment, and supplies
The list of powers and duties school district boards are charged with appears in Vermont Statutes 16 § 563 and are as follows:[3]
|
Constraints on Vermont school boards' authority
This section tracks constraints on school boards specific to Vermont as of September 2024. It features constraints on school boards' authority from state law, collective bargaining agreements, and Parents' Bills of Rights.
Constraint on Vermont school boards' authority by topic
This section features constraints on Vermont school boards' authority on policies related to the following topics:
Curriculum requirements
Vermont requires the following specific topics to be included in each district's curriculum:[4]
- communication skills (including reading, writing, and the use of numbers)
- citizenship, history, and government in Vermont and the United States
- physical and health education (including the effects of tobacco, alcoholic drinks, and drugs on the human system and on society)
- English, American, and other literature
- tobacco, alcohol, and drug abuse prevention[5]
Curriculum restrictions
Ballotpedia could not identify any curricular content prohibited by state statutes, regulations, case law, or collective bargaining agreements.
Book bans, removals, and restrictions
Vermont school boards have the authority to remove books from school libraries. State law requires school boards to develop and enforce "library material selection policy and procedures for the reconsideration and retention of materials that affirm the importance of intellectual freedom," according to state law.[7]
|
Case law:
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed local school boards' authority to remove school books in Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico in 1982 but held that school library books are distinct from curricular books, which school boards have more authority to regulate. The ruling held that school boards are charged with inculcating community values and may make curricular decisions accordingly. In Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp. in 1980, the Supreme Court held that school boards had discretionary power over curriculum, textbooks, and other educational matters but could not impose religious creeds or "permanently the student’s ability to investigate matters that arise in the natural course of intellectual inquiry,” according to the opinion.[8][9][10]
Parental notification
Vermont requires parental notification regarding the following:[12]
- their school choice options
- an incident of bullying or harassment involving their child
- their child is found to be absent without cause
- misconduct by their child, including if disciplinary actions are taken
- their child is secluded or restrained for any reason
- their right to move their child to a different school if their child attends a school that has been deemed according to state law as persistently dangerous[13]
Vermont schools receiving Title I funds under the Every Student Succeeds Act have additional parental notification requirements:[14]
- schools receiving Title I funds must notify parents that they have the right to ask for and receive information about the qualifications of their children’s teacher
- schools receiving Title I funds must notify parents about an unqualified teacher who has been teaching their children for four or more consecutive weeks
Case law: The United States Supreme Court ruled in Mahmoud v. Taylor on June 27, 2025, that Montgomery County Board of Education's introduction of LGBTQ+ related storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, placed an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion.[15]
Discipline
Vermont is the only state that gives individual schools the authority to adopt disciplinary policy.
However, school boards are given authority to create suspension and expulsion policies, according to Vermont Statutes 16 § 1162. The text of Vermont Statutes 16 § 1161a and 16 § 1162 are as follows:[16][17]
§ 1161a. Discipline
(a) Each public and each approved independent school shall adopt and implement a comprehensive plan for responding to student misbehavior. To the extent appropriate, the plan shall promote the positive development of youths. The plan shall include:
(1) The school’s approach to classroom management and response to disruptive behavior, including the use of alternative educational settings.
(2) The manner in which the school will provide information and training to students in methods of conflict resolution, peer mediation, and anger management.
(3) Procedures for informing parents of the school’s discipline policies, for notifying parents of student misconduct, and for working with parents to improve student behavior.
(4) The school’s response to significant disruptions, such as threats or use of bombs or weapons.
(5) A description of how the school will ensure that all staff and contractors who routinely have unsupervised contact with students periodically receive training on the maintenance of a safe, orderly, civil, and positive learning environment. The training shall be appropriate to the role of the staff member being trained and shall teach classroom and behavior management, enforcement of the school’s discipline policies, and positive youth development models.
(6) A description of behaviors on and off school grounds that constitute misconduct, including harassment, bullying, and hazing, particularly those behaviors that may be grounds for expulsion. The plan shall include a description of misconduct as listed in subdivisions 11(a)(26)(A)-(C) and (32) of this title that, although serious, does not rise to the level of harassment or bullying as those terms are defined in these subdivisions.
(7) Standard due process procedures for suspension and expulsion of a student.
(b) For the purpose of this chapter, “corporal punishment” means the intentional infliction of physical pain upon the body of a pupil as a disciplinary measure.
(c) No person employed by or agent of a public or approved independent school shall inflict or cause to be inflicted corporal punishment upon a student attending the school or the institution. However, this section does not prohibit a person from using reasonable and necessary force:
(1) to quell a disturbance;
(2) to obtain possession of weapons or other dangerous objects upon the person of or within the control of a student;
(3) for the purpose of self defense; or
(4) for the protection of persons or property.
§ 1162. Suspension or expulsion of students
(a) A superintendent or principal may, pursuant to policies adopted by the school board that are consistent with State Board rules, suspend a student for up to 10 school days or, with the approval of the board of the school district, expel a student for up to the remainder of the school year or up to 90 school days, whichever is longer, for misconduct:
(1) on school property, on a school bus, or at a school-sponsored activity when the misconduct makes the continued presence of the student harmful to the welfare of the school;
(2) not on school property, on a school bus, or at a school-sponsored activity where direct harm to the welfare of the school can be demonstrated; or
(3) not on school property, on a school bus, or at a school-sponsored activity where the misconduct can be shown to pose a clear and substantial interference with another student’s equal access to educational programs.
(b) Nothing contained in this section shall prevent a superintendent or principal, subject to subsequent due process procedures, from removing immediately from a school a student who poses a continuing danger to persons or property or an ongoing threat of disrupting the academic process of the school, or from expelling a student who brings a weapon to school pursuant to section 1166 of this title.
(c) Principals, superintendents, and school boards are authorized and encouraged to provide alternative education services or programs to students during any period of suspension or expulsion authorized under this section.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this chapter, a student enrolled in a public school, approved independent school, or prequalified private prekindergarten program who is under eight years of age shall not be suspended or expelled from the school; provided, however, that the school may suspend or expel the student if the student poses an imminent threat of harm or danger to others in the school.
School board elections
- See also: Rules governing school board election dates and timing in Vermont, How does Vermont compare to other states on school board authority over election timing?
Vermont is one of 42 states in which school boards do not have authority over the timing of school board elections because state or municipal laws determine school board election dates.
Click here to read about the laws governing school board elections in Vermont.
Public school choice and open enrollment
- See also: School choice in Vermont
Though intra- and interdistrict open enrollment policies for high schools are mandatory across the state, school boards can set limits based on the financial impact and the capacity of the program, class, and building. School boards across districts are authorized make arrangements for tuition payments as they see fit:[19]
“ |
§ 822a. Public high school choice (a) Definitions. In this section: (1) “High school” means a public school or that portion of a public school that offers grades 9 through 12 or some subset of those grades. (2) “Student” means a student’s parent or guardian if the student is a minor or under guardianship and means a student himself or herself if the student is not a minor. (b) Limits on transferring students. A sending high school board may limit the number of resident students who transfer to another high school under this section in each year; provided that in no case shall it limit the potential number of new transferring students to fewer than five percent of the resident students enrolled in the sending high school as of October 1 of the academic year in which the calculation is made or 10 students, whichever is fewer; and further provided that in no case shall the total number of transferring students in any year exceed 10 percent of all resident high school students or 40 students, whichever is fewer. (c) Capacity. On or before February 1 each year, the board of a high school district shall define and announce its capacity to accept students under this section. The Secretary shall develop, review, and update guidelines to assist high school district boards to define capacity limits. Guidelines may include limits based on the capacity of the program, class, grade, school building, measurable adverse financial impact, or other factors, but shall not be based on the need to provide special education services. (d) Lottery. (1) Subject to the provisions of subsection (f) of this section, if more than the allowable number of students wish to transfer to a school under this section, then the board of the receiving high school district shall devise a nondiscriminatory lottery system for determining which students may transfer. (2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (f) of this section, if more than the allowable number of students wish to transfer from a school under this section, then the board of the sending high school district shall devise a nondiscriminatory lottery system for determining which students may transfer; provided, however: (A) a board shall give preference to the transfer request of a student whose request to transfer from the school was denied in a prior year; and (B) a board that has established limits under subsection (b) of this section may choose to waive those limits in any year. (e) Application and notification. (1) A high school district shall accept applications for enrollment until March 1 of the school year preceding the school year for which the student is applying. (2) A high school district shall notify each student of acceptance or rejection of the application by April 1 of the school year preceding the school year for which the student is applying. (3) An accepted student shall notify both the sending and the receiving high schools of his or her decision to enroll or not to enroll in the receiving high school by April 15 of the school year preceding the school year for which the student has applied. (4) After sending notification of enrollment, a student may enroll in a school other than the receiving high school only if the student, the receiving high school, and the high school in which the student wishes to enroll agree. If the student becomes a resident of a different school district, the student may enroll in the high school maintained by the new district of residence. (5) If a student who is enrolled in a high school other than in the school district of residence notifies the school district of residence by July 15 of the intent to return to that school for the following school year, the student shall be permitted to return to the high school in the school district of residence without requiring agreement of the receiving district or the sending district. (f) Enrollment. (1) An enrolled nonresident student shall be permitted to remain enrolled in the receiving high school without renewed applications in subsequent years unless: (A) the student graduates; (B) the student is no longer a Vermont resident; or (C) the student is expelled from school in accordance with adopted school policy. (2) A career technical education (CTE) center serving the region in which a receiving high school district is located shall be the CTE center in which a nonresident student under this section is eligible to enroll. The nonresident student shall be eligible to use any transportation the district provides for resident students attending the CTE center. (g) Tuition and other costs. (1) Unless the sending and receiving schools agree to a different arrangement, no tuition or other cost shall be charged by the receiving district or paid by the sending district for a student transferring to a different high school under this section; provided, however, a sending high school district shall pay special education and career technical education costs for resident students pursuant to the provisions of this title. (2) A student transferring to a different high school under this section shall pay no tuition, fee, or other cost that is not also paid by students residing in the receiving district. (3) A district of residence shall include within its average daily membership any student who transfers to another high school under this section; a receiving school district shall not include any student who transfers to it under this section. (h) Special education. If a student who is eligible for and receiving special education services chooses to enroll in a high school other than in the high school district of residence, then the receiving high school shall carry out the individualized education program, including placement, developed by the sending high school district. If the receiving high school believes that a student not on an individualized education program may be eligible for special education services or that an existing individualized education program should be altered, it shall notify the sending high school district. When a sending high school district considers eligibility, development of an individualized education program, or changes to a program, it shall give notice of meetings to the receiving high school district and provide an opportunity for representatives of that district to attend the meetings and participate in making decisions. (i) Suspension and expulsion. A sending high school district is not required to provide services to a resident student during a period of suspension or expulsion imposed by another high school district. (j) Transportation. Jointly, the superintendent of each supervisory union shall establish and update a statewide clearinghouse providing information to students about transportation options among the high school districts. (k) Nonapplicability of other laws. The provisions of subsections 824(b) and (c) (amount of tuition), 825(b) and (c) (maximum tuition rate), and 826(a) (notice of tuition change) and section 836 (tuition overcharge and undercharge) of this chapter shall not apply to enrollment in a high school pursuant to this section. (l) Waiver. If a high school board determines that participation under this section would adversely affect students in its high school, then it may petition the Secretary for an exemption. The Secretary’s decision shall be final. (m) Report. Notwithstanding 2 V.S.A. § 20(d), the Secretary shall report annually in January to the Senate and House Committees on Education on the implementation of public high school choice as provided in this section, including a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the program’s impact on the quality of educational services available to students and the expansion of educational opportunities. [2] |
” |
Additionally, school districts are required to allow students to transfer schools within their district if they attend a school that has been deemed persistently dangerous according to state law or if they have been a victim of a violent crime:[13]
“ |
(a) Unsafe school choice - Each local education agency shall ensure that any student who either attends a persistently dangerous public elementary or secondary school, or is a victim of a violent criminal offense that occurred in or on the grounds of a public elementary or secondary school that the student attends, shall be allowed to attend a safe public school at the same grade level within that local education agency. For purposes of this section, a "safe public school" shall mean a public school that has not been designated by the Department of Education as a persistently dangerous public elementary or secondary school. (b) Persistently dangerous school -- Each local education agency shall, by June 1, furnish data requested by the Commissioner on whether its schools are persistently dangerous. If data becomes available after June 1, but before June 30, the report shall be amended by the local education agency. The Commissioner shall determine by June 30 whether and which schools are persistently dangerous. A school shall be designated as persistently dangerous if all of the criteria in (1) -- (3) below are met for each of the immediately prior three school years: (1) 3% or more of the student enrollment or, with respect to a school with a student enrollment of less than a hundred, at least three students, have been expelled for violence-related incidents that occurred in or on the grounds of the school; (2) One or more students have been expelled for possessing a weapon in or on the grounds of the school. For purposes of this section "weapon" means a dangerous or deadly weapon within the meaning of 13 V.S.A. § 4016(a)(2); and (3) 3% or more of the student enrollment or, with respect to schools with a student enrollment of less than a hundred, at least three students, have been determined to be victims of violent criminal offenses and have exercised the school choice option described in subsection (a), above. This criterion is inapplicable with respect to any school year prior to July 1, 2003. (c) Duration of designation -- A school that has been designated as being persistently dangerous shall continue to be so designated until such time as two consecutive school years have passed in which the school has met less than all of the criteria set forth in subsections (b)(1) - (3), above. (d) Victims of violent criminal offenses -- When a student seeks to exercise school choice as the victim of a violent criminal offense, the principal shall determine whether that student is the victim of a violent criminal offense that occurred in or on the grounds of the school that the student attends. Such principal shall, prior to making any such determination, consult with any law enforcement agency investigating such alleged violent criminal offense and consider any reports or records provided by such agency. The principal may conclude that a student has been a victim of a violent criminal offense where either: (1) the perpetrator has admitted the violent conduct, or (2) the evidence against the perpetrator allows for no reasonable doubt that he or she committed the offense. The determination of the principal may be appealed by or on behalf of a student claiming to be the victim of a violent offense to the superintendent, and then to the school board for the district. For purposes of this section, "violent criminal offense" shall mean any simple assault as defined in 13 V.S.A. § 1023 that results in bodily injury, or any crime listed under 13 V.S.A. § 5301(7)(A)-(I), (M), (N) & (P)-(T). (e) Transfer - Any student who transfers to a safe public school pursuant to subsection (a), above, shall be enrolled in the classes and other activities of the public school to which such student transfers in the same manner as all other children at that public school. (f) Notification - Each local education agency that is required to provide school choice pursuant to the provisions of this section shall promptly notify parents of, or persons in parental relation to students: (1) attending schools that have been designated as persistently dangerous, or (2) who are victims of violent criminal offenses of their right to transfer to a safe public school within the local education agency, and of the procedures for such transfer. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require such notification if there are no other public schools within the local education agency at the same grade level. (g) Duration of unsafe school choice -- Any student who transfers to a safe public school pursuant to subsection (a), above, shall be permitted to remain in such safe public school until the end of the last grade-level offered at the school from which he or she transferred. (h) Designating a safe public school - When a school has been designated as a persistently dangerous public elementary or secondary school, or when a student has been the victim of a violent criminal offense that occurred in or on the grounds of a public elementary or secondary school that the student attends, it shall be the responsibility of the local education agency, after consultation with the student's parents, based on objective criteria, to designate a safe public school or schools within the local education agency to which the student(s) may transfer. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require a local education agency to designate a safe public school if there are no other public schools within the local education agency at the same grade level. (i) Transportation - Consistent with the criteria of its transportation policy, the local education agency shall provide transportation for any student permitted to transfer to the safe public school within the local education agency it has designated pursuant to subdivision (h) of this section. (j) Definition of local education agency -- For purposes of this section, "local education agency" shall mean a school district, as defined in 16 V.S.A. § 11(a)(10). 16 V.S.A. §§ 164(7), 168[2] |
” |
Charter schools
- See also: Charter schools in Vermont, How does Vermont compare to other states on school board authority over charter schools?
Vermont is one of three states for which Ballotpedia could not identify legislation regarding the authorization of public charter schools.
Cellphone bans
Vermont is one of 26 states with state laws or executive orders prohibiting or limiting cell phones in classrooms and/or schools, including through requiring school boards to pass certain policies. Vermont Governor Phil Scott (R) signed H480 into law on June 27, 2025, directing the Secretary of Education to collaborate with the Vermont School Boards Association, the Vermont Independent School Association, and the Vermont Coalition for Phone and Social Media Free Schools to develop a policy prohibiting the use of cellphones in K-12 Schools. The policy, which must include exceptions for students with individualized healthcare or education plans and allow for administrator discretion, must be completed by January 1, 2026, to take effect during the 2026–2027 school year. H480 also prohibits schools from requiring students to use social media unless approved by the school district for recorded communication. [20]
Collective bargaining agreements
Teacher union collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) can constrain school board authority. Teacher CBAs are agreements between a school district and a teachers’ union to establish rights and other contract details for public school employees. CBAs do not have the force of law, but are contractually binding for a set period of time. Within the time set out in the agreement, the school board must comply with the stipulations that were agreed to in the contract. In this way, CBAs can constrain school board authority by giving teachers authority over curriculum, prohibiting school boards from banning books, and establishing certain student or parental rights. They can also determine rights and protections for educators, and conditions for students (such as required recess periods or the amount of standardized testing), among other provisions.
CBAs vary greatly within and across states in size, topics covered, and constraints they put on school boards. Not all states allow teachers to bargain collectively. As of January 2022, 35 states and the District of Columbia guaranteed K-12 teachers some right to bargain collectively, and six states prohibited public-sector employee collective bargaining by law, which includes public school teachers. The other nine states have no statewide bargaining framework, but local jurisdictions within these states can grant bargaining rights if they choose.[21][22]
Vermont school boards are authorized to engage in collective bargaining agreements with school employees, which can constrain their authority over certain district policies.
For example, while school boards in Vermont are charged with managing the employees of the school district, a collective bargaining agreement between the Essex Westford Educational Community Unified Union School Board and the Essex Westford Education Association Support Staff Unit requires the school board to have just cause before disciplining, demoting, suspending, or discharging employees.[23]
|
Parents' bill of rights
Vermont is one of 24 states that does not have a statewide Parents' Bill of Rights.
How does Vermont compare to other states?
This section compares Vermont's school board authority and constraints with those of other states on select topics. These topics include authority over discipline policy, school board election timing, charter schools, cellphone use policy, as well as constraints on school boards' authority from Parents' Bills of Rights.
Book bans, removals, and restrictions
Twenty-four (24) states have no laws regulating the curation of school library books. Twenty-six (26) states, however, have passed laws restricting school board authority over school library book curation. These laws typically fall into one of the following categories:
- Ten states require school boards to develop a policy for the removal of books, including creating a way for the public to challenge school library books.
- Eight states prohibit school boards from removing books on the grounds that they represent specific ideologies or perspectives.
- Six states prohibit books if they contain specific material, including sexual content or anything deemed harmful to minors.
- Five states require school boards to establish local boards to review challenges to library books.
- Two states require school boards to allow parents to view a catalogue of books.
Some states have adopted multiple types of these policies.
Discipline
- School boards in 47 states have authority over disciplinary policy in their district.
- School boards in two states have authority over disciplinary policy for specific circumstances, such as suspension, expulsion, or bullying.
- Individual schools in one state create their own disciplinary policy.
School board elections
School boards' authority over the timing of school board elections varies by state.
- School boards in 42 states do not have authority over election timing;
- School boards in five states can choose from limited options when to hold school board elections;
- School boards in two states can choose from a date range when to hold school board elections;
- The school board in Hawaii is not elected.
The map below shows the types of authority school boards in the states have to determine the timing of school board elections.
Charter schools
- See also: Charter schools in the United States
Some school boards in the U.S. are authorized to approve or deny applications for charter schools in their district, while state boards of education hold the authority in other states. In some states, school boards can authorize charter schools, but there are other entities besides school boards that can also authorize charter schools or to which a school board decision can be appealed.
- 10 states do not authorize school boards to make decisions on whether to approve new charter schools in their districts.
- 36 states do authorize school boards to approve new charter schools in their districts, deny approval to new charter schools, or both.
- 3 states do not have laws governing charter school authorization.
- 1 state allows school districts to apply to the state board of education to be a charter school district.
State cellphone laws
In most states, school boards or superintendents often set policies on cellphones in public schools. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), around 76% of schools said they banned the non-academic use of cellphones or smartphones during school hours during the 2021-22 school year, down from 91% in 2010.[24]
Beginning with Florida in 2023, some states enacted laws or policies to regulate student cellphone usage in public schools. Twenty-six (26) states had statewide laws or policies restricting cellphone use in K-12 classrooms or schools as of June 2025. Four states had requirements for all school district boards to adopt a policy on cellphones but without specific requirements for those policies. Four other states had policies encouraging school districts to establish restrictions on cellphone use in the classroom.
Parents' Bill of Rights
- See also: Parents' Bill of Rights in education
If state law explicitly provides certain rights to parents, it can constrain the policy-making authority of school boards. These sections of statute are often referred to within statute and are categorized here as Parents' Bills of Rights. In some states, they are education-specific, regarding the rights a parent has to be involved in their child's public education. Common examples include notification requirements, opt-out rights, and records access. Other Parents' Bills of Rights are more general, commonly affording parents a right to direct the upbringing of their child.
- 26 states have enacted a statewide Parents' Bill of Rights
- 24 states have not enacted a Parents' Bill of Rights.
Noteworthy events
- Vermont enacts bill to shift education funding and structure (2025): Vermont Governor Phil Scott (R) signed House Bill 454 on July 1, 2025, to shift the structure and funding of the state's public schools. The bill establishes a committee to consolidate school districts, establishes a statewide school calendar, and amends the funding structure for the state's public schools.[25]
- Vermont adopts K-12 cellphone ban (2025): Vermont Governor Phil Scott (R) signed H480 into law on June 27, 2025, directing the Secretary of Education to collaborate with the Vermont School Boards Association, the Vermont Independent School Association, and the Vermont Coalition for Phone and Social Media Free Schools to develop a policy prohibiting the use of cellphones in K-12 Schools. The policy, which must include exceptions for students with individualized healthcare or education plans and allow for administrator discretion, must be completed by January 1, 2026, to take effect during the 2026–2027 school year. H480 also prohibits schools from requiring students to use social media unless approved by the school district for recorded communication. [26]
- Coalition of attorneys general files amicus brief in support of incorporating LGBTQ+ books in curriculum (2023): A coalition of 19 attorneys general filed an amicus brief on October 31, 2023, in support of Maryland's Montgomery County Board of Education’s policy to allow LGBTQ+ books to be incorporated into the curriculum. Montgomery County Public Schools faced legal challenges from a group of parents after implementing a policy in the 2022-2023 school year to incorporate LGBTQ+ books into their curriculum. The coalition included attorneys general from California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia.[27]
See also
- Local school board authority across the 50 states
- K-12 curriculum authority, requirements, and statutes in the states
- State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools
- Rules governing school board election dates and timing
- Charter schools
- School choice
- Parents' Bill of Rights in education
- Ballotpedia:Index of Contents
- Support our work
Footnotes
- ↑ Vermont Legislature, "16 V.S.A. § 11," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Vermont Legislature, "16 V.S.A. § 563," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ Vermont Legislature, "16 V.S.A. § 906 - Courses of Study," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ Vermont Legislature, "16 V.S.A. § 909 - Tobacco use, alcohol and drug abuse prevention education curriculum," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ The White House, "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling," accessed March 14, 2025
- ↑ Vermont Legislature, "S.220 (Act 150)," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ Education Law Center, Pennsylvania, "Challenging book bans: What can you do," September 18, 2024
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "Island Trees Sch. Dist. v. Pico by Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982)," September 18, 2024
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "Zykan v. Warsaw Community School Corp., 631 F.2d 1300 (7th Cir. 1980)," October 11, 2024
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, "U.S. Department of Education Ends Biden’s Book Ban Hoax," accessed January 28, 2025
- ↑ National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments, "Vermont School Discipline Laws & Regulations: Parental Notification," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Law.Justia.com, " VT Code of Rules 22 000 032," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ State of Vermont Agency of Education, "Title I Parental Notice," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ The United States Supreme Court, "Mahmoud et al. v. Taylor et al." Accessed July 7, 2025
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "16 VT Stats § 1161a," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ Law.Justia.com, "16 VT Stats § 1162," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ The White House, "Reinstating Common Sense School Discipline Policies," April 30, 2025
- ↑ Vermont General Assembly, " 16 V.S.A. § 822a- Public High School Choice," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ Legiscan, "Vermont H480," accessed July 3, 2025
- ↑ National Education Association, "Collective Bargaining: What it is and How it Works", accessed October 3, 2024.
- ↑ National Education Association, "The Benefits of Collective Bargaining in Education", accessed October 3, 2024
- ↑ Essex Westford School District, "Collective Bargaining Agreements - Support Staff Agreement 2024-2026," accessed January 29, 2025
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Percentage of public schools with various safety and security measures: Selected school years, 1999-2000 through 2021-22," accessed August 8, 2024
- ↑ Vermont General Assembly, "H.454 An act relating to transforming Vermont’s education governance, quality, and finance systems," accessed July 2, 2025
- ↑ Legiscan, "Vermont H480," accessed July 3, 2025
- ↑ Rob Bonta Attorney General, "Attorney General Bonta Joins Multistate Coalition in Effort to Support Curriculum Inclusivity for Transgender Students," October 31, 2023