Shawn Eyestone

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This board member is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.
2024 - Present
2025
1
Shawn Eyestone is a member of the Iowa City Community School District school board At-large. He assumed office in 2024. His current term ends in 2025.
Eyestone ran in a special election to the Iowa City Community School District school board At-large. He won in the special general election on September 12, 2017.
Biography
Eyestone obtained his bachelor's degree in biology from Luther College. He has worked as the manager of the high throughput quality control department at DNA Integrated Technologies. Eyestone has been involved in the Parent Teacher Organization in the district. [1]
Elections
2017
Four of seven seats on the Iowa City Community School District Board of Education in Iowa were up for at-large election on September 12, 2017. One of the four seats was a two-year term seat up for special election to complete LaTasha DeLoach's term after she resigned in July 2017. No incumbents ran to retain their seat, leaving four open seats.[2][3]
Former candidate J.P. Claussen and newcomers Janet Godwin and Ruthina Malone defeated newcomers Laura Westemeyer, and Karen Woltman for the four-year at-large seats. Newcomer Charlie Eastham lost to former candidate Shawn Eyestone in the race for the two-year at-large seat.[4]
Iowa City Community School District, At-Large General Election, 2-year term, 2017 |
||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
![]() |
52.06% | 6,405 |
Charlie Eastham | 47.02% | 5,785 |
Write-in votes | 0.92% | 113 |
Total Votes | 12,303 | |
Source: Johnson County, Iowa, "September 12, 2017 School Election - Official Canvassed Results," accessed September 18, 2017 |
2015
Five of the seven seats on the Iowa City Community School District Board of Education were up for election on September 8, 2015. Four seats have a four-year term, and one seat has a two-year term. All seats on the board of education represent the district at-large.
The candidates for the four-year term seats were LaTasha DeLoach, Shawn Eyestone, Todd Fanning, Phil Hemingway, Jason Lewis, Brian Richman, Lori Roetlin, Lucas Van Orden, Brianna Wills and Tom Yates. Incumbents Patti Fields, Jeff McGinness, Marla Swesey and Orville Townsend did not run for re-election. DeLoach, Hemingway, Roetlin and Yates defeated Eyestone, Fanning, Lewis, Richman Van Orden and Wills for the four seats.[5]
Board member Tuyet Baruah resigned from the board leaving an open seat with a two-year term. The candidates for the vacant seat were Christopher Liebig, Paul Roesler and Megan Schwalm. Liebig defeated Roesler and Schwalm for the seat.[5][6][7]
Results
This election was held September 8, 2015.
Iowa City Community School District, At-Large, 4-Year Term, General Election, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
![]() |
17.5% | 4,316 |
![]() |
14.1% | 3,469 |
![]() |
13.8% | 3,403 |
![]() |
12.5% | 3,065 |
Brian Richman | 10.6% | 2,598 |
Jason Lewis | 10.3% | 2,538 |
Todd Fanning | 7.5% | 1,833 |
Brianna Wills | 6.4% | 1,574 |
Shawn Eyestone | 5.4% | 1,337 |
Lucas Van Orden | 1.9% | 469 |
Total Votes | 24,602 | |
Source: Johnson County Auditor's Office, "School Election Results," accessed November 12, 2015 |
Funding
Eyestone reported $1,140.00 in contributions and $1,140.00 in expenditures to the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board, which left his campaign with $0 on hand in the election.[8]
Endorsements
Eyestone received official endorsements from The Gazette and North Corridor Parents.[9].[10]
Campaign themes
2015
Ballotpedia survey responses
Eyestone participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates. The following sections display his responses to the survey questions. When asked what his top priority would be if elected, the candidate made the following statement:
“ | Focus on improved student achievement. We have done a great job so far in improving the facilities for our entire district. It is time to work out a detailed plan for better student learning.[11] | ” |
—Shawn Eyestone (2015)[12] |
Eyestone also included the following statement with his responses:
“ | I think our district needs to do a better job seeking feedback from our teachers. We are good with seeking feedback from parents, but that isn't always a true picture of what our students need.
We should also look at the possibility of a middle school system vs. our current 7th and 8th grade Jr. High.[11] |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone (2015)[12] |
Ranking the issues
The candidate was asked to rank the following issues by importance in the school district, with 1 being the most important and 7 being the least important. This table displays this candidate's rankings from most to least important:
Education policy |
---|
Click here to learn more about education policy in Idaho. |
Education on the ballot |
Issue importance ranking | |
---|---|
Candidate's ranking | Issue |
Closing the achievement gap | |
Improving education for special needs students | |
Expanding career-technical education | |
Expanding arts education | |
Improving college readiness | |
Balancing or maintaining the district's budget | |
Expanding school choice options |
Positions on the issues
The candidate was asked to answer 10 questions from Ballotpedia regarding significant issues in education and the school district. The questions are in the left column, and the candidate's responses are in the right column of the following table:
Question | Response |
---|---|
"Modifications are required before they are implemented." | |
"No" | |
"No" | |
"No" | |
"Accessibility and awareness is key. High and low achieving students need different things. We need to get them access to those different things. We need to get extra resources into the schools with high numbers of low achieving students." | |
"Expulsion should be used for serious offenses to ensure the safety of other students as well as the integrity of education at district schools." | |
"The first step is to determine why it is failing and in what way. Then specific goals must be set forth as to what will be addressed first, second and then third. Decisions moving forward will then be made with those specific goals in mind at all times. Specific professional development for teachers in those areas. Aids for classroom teachers that specialize in that area. Other extra resources. Then we must frequently evaluate what is working and what isn't and adapt our plan accordingly." | |
"No" | |
"Set up a mentorship program for the underperforming teacher with a more experienced teacher in the district." | |
"Transparency is a buzz word, but it is still valid. Giving the reasons behind every decision made by the board instead of just the final answer can help to achieve buy-in from the community. The board also sets the tone for the district. If they can't work together cohesively, then why should the community expect to do the same?" |
Position on school closing
The advocacy group Save Hoover asked each candidate, "If you are elected, will you support amending the long-term facilities plan to keep Hoover Elementary School open?" Eyestone gave the following response:
“ | My straight answer to your question is no. At this time I don’t have enough evidence before me to want to alter the Facilities Master plan to keep Hoover open. With some very good friends as parents at Hoover, I know this runs the risk of creating some hostility. I hope that can be avoided by at least having some understanding of my thinking. However, I am very open to hearing a compelling argument as to why I should change my opinion. I truly understand the meaning that each of our schools and our school families have for us. I know that the buildings themselves can hold a lot of memories and a sense of nostalgia. But there is more to the school than just the building itself. It is the relationships our children build with each other. It is the rapport that parents have with their children’s teachers and school administrators. It is that sense of family that creates the strong bonds that make our district as great as it is. That is what I would be against getting rid of. I wouldn’t be in favor of splitting up the entire school and scattering them to the wind. I would like to see those families kept together as much as possible and the teachers and administrators have the chance to go with them. The building itself is a different matter. As a Board member, I would have the responsibility to best help the entire district from a top level as well as each student on an individual basis. As an elementary school parent I have to remind myself that every student means elementary, Junior High and High School. The Master plan lists several much needed additions to City High. These additions are to help make all of the high school students in the community have the same access to high quality programs. In order to complete these additions to the building, some of the current City High property and components will be displaced. The nearest and admittedly easiest place to gain back that lost ground is the current Hoover site. I believe Hoover is also being tasked as a swing school to help with construction at many other facilities around the district. This touches a lot of students’ lives around the district in a positive way. I know it touches the lives of the students at Hoover most deeply and not completely in a positive way. I can tell you that as a parent at one of the newer, larger schools in the district, I really do love it. I’m constantly amazed at what the staff is able to do utilizing the space to its fullest and the professional development work they accomplish as a team. My kids, the teachers and parents are quite proud of their school and I truly feel that Hoover parents, teachers and students will be just as proud of their new school. As I said earlier, I am willing to listen to arguments because I am not as completely educated on the topic as I should be. I can only speak from what I know. If the plan is to scatter all of the current families at Hoover to the wind I would like to hear more about that. I would also love to hear other proposals that show how these other great things in our district can be accomplished if Hoover does stay open. The couple of times I have had the opportunity to visit Hoover, I enjoyed the building very much. The same thing is true for all of the schools in our district. No matter how big, how small, round, square, tall or short, the students are all happy to be there. The staff loves their kids and we are providing a top notch education to all of them. My hope is that every decision the Board makes stays true to that statement and improves on an already impressive resume.[11] | ” |
—Shawn Eyestone, [13] |
Campaign website
Eyestones' campaign website highlighted the following campaign themes for 2015:
All students are important
“ | We need to ensure programming for all types of students.
-Currently below grade level |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
Plan for the future without sacrificing the present
“ | We need to plan for expected growth, but put effort into schools who are struggling with their current conditions.
-Overcrowding |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
Keyword:Community
“ | We forget that we are one community-- the Iowa City Community School District--struggling on a larger scale to ensure what's best for our kids.
-Our community must fight against cuts to education funding and must be vigilant in finding solutions. Collaboration between all board members can get the job done. -Calm, rational discussion is vital to moving forward We are losing ground on state and nationwide scales because of in-fighting within our own district. We must be one community.[11] |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
Decisive and timely action
“ | Follow the process we have set out: Seek public input, discuss the issue, and vote.
-Have an agenda and stick to it Don’t let “perfect” get in the way of really good. -There is no perfect solution Stand by decisions, but be able to admit when the decision was wrong and move forward. Spending too much time concocting the perfect Plan A leaves little time for enacting the plan, and even less time for switching to Plan B when needed.[11] |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
Practicality of attendance zones
“ | Don’t make kids who live across the street from a school go elsewhere.
-Schools come in all sizes and student composition: that’s not always a bad thing Treating each school fairly does not mean treating them the same -If a school has a large population of students with special needs, ensure that the staff is designed to handle that |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
Providing a welcoming and stable community
“ | We must stem the tide of parents opting to take their children out of our district.
-People have left our community because of what they perceive to be poor decision making and inaction We are a growing community but we can't lose sight of the individuals and just see groups. -We need to make sure everyone feels they belong and are being considered in every decision |
” |
—Shawn Eyestone's campaign website, (2015), [14] |
See also
- Iowa City Community School District, Iowa
- Iowa City Community School District elections (2017)
- Iowa City Community School District elections (2015)
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Shawn Eyestone for ICCSD School Board, "Bio," accessed August 19, 2015
- ↑ The Gazette, "Iowa City school board member LaTasha DeLoach to resign," accessed July 17, 2017
- ↑ Johnson County, Iowa, "September 12, 2017 School Election: Candidates and Ballot Issues," accessed August 4, 2017
- ↑ Johnson County, Iowa, "September 12, 2017 School Election - Preliminary Results," accessed September 12, 2017
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Johnson County Auditor's Office, "School Election Results," accessed September 8, 2015
- ↑ Johnson County, Iowa, "September 8, 2015 School Election," accessed August 3, 2015
- ↑ Iowa City Community School District, "School Board Members," accessed June 23, 2015
- ↑ Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board, "IECDB State/Local Campaign Disclosure Reports," accessed February 2, 2016
- ↑ North Corridor Parents, "Candidate Recommendations," accessed September 6, 2015
- ↑ The Gazette, "Our endorsements for Iowa City school board," August 23, 2015
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Ballotpedia School Board Candidate Survey, 2015, "Shawn Eyestone responses," August 24, 2015
- ↑ Save Hoover, "Compilation: The School Board Candidates Respond to the Hoover Question," August 16, 2015
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 Shawn Eyestone for ICCSD School Board, "Issues," accessed August 19, 2015
Iowa City Community School District elections in 2017 | |
Johnson County, Iowa | |
Election date: | September 12, 2017 |
Candidates: | At-large (4-year): J.P. Claussen • Janet Godwin • Ruthina Malone • Laura Westemeyer • Karen Woltman At-large (2-year): Charlie Eastham • Shawn Eyestone |
Important information: | What was at stake? |
2015 Iowa City Community School District Elections | |
Johnson County, Iowa | |
Election date: | September 8, 2015 |
Candidates: | At-large (four-year term): • LaTasha DeLoach • Shawn Eyestone • Todd Fanning • Phil Hemingway • Jason Lewis • Brian Richman • Lori Roetlin • Lucas Van Orden • Brianna Wills • Tom Yates At-large (two-year term): • Christopher Liebig • Paul Roesler • Megan Schwalm |
Important information: | What was at stake? • Key deadlines • Additional elections on the ballot |