Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES; SIMPSON et al., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD (1913)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES; SIMPSON et al., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD
Term: 1912
Important Dates
Argued: April 9, 1912
Decided: June 9, 1913
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
William Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesCharles Evans HughesJoseph Rucker LamarHorace Harmon LurtonMahlon PitneyWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White
Concurring
Joseph McKenna

THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES; SIMPSON et al., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 9, 1913. The case was argued before the court on April 9, 1912.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Minnesota U.S. Circuit for the District of Minnesota.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal or state regulation of transportation regulation: railroad
  • Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Petitioner state: Minnesota
  • Respondent type: Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 230 U.S. 352
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Charles Evans Hughes

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes