Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Tennessee drops Wells Fargo investigation (2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
ESG - Teal - D2.jpg
Environmental, social, and corporate governance
ESG Icon 200x200.png

What is ESG?
Enacted ESG legislation
Arguments for and against ESG
Opposition to ESG
Federal ESG rules
ESG legislation tracker
Economy and Society: Ballotpedia's weekly ESG newsletter
See also: Opposition to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing, Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)

April 8, 2025

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti (R) last week closed his investigation into whether Wells Fargo coordinated with other financial institutions to promote net-zero climate policies in violation of antitrust laws.

The investigation was part of a broader effort by Republican attorneys general to challenge coordination among financial institutions on climate policy. Skrmetti closed the case after the bank announced plans to move away from net-zero commitments.

According to ESG Dive:

The San Francisco-based bank in February said it was scrapping net-zero financed emissions goals and discontinuing 2030 sector-specific targets on financed emissions that focused on carbon-intensive sectors like oil and gas, power, aviation, steel and automotive production.

The group of states has probed whether Wells Fargo and five other U.S. banks — Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley — have violated antitrust or consumer protection laws by implementing net-zero emissions policies and limiting financing.

“Companies exist to make money, not policy,” Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti said in a statement Thursday. “I commend Wells Fargo’s pro-consumer decision to step away from utopian policymaking, and I look forward to the rest of America’s major financial institutions following its lead.”[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.