Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Town of Lakewood Marijuana Retail Ban, Measure 2A (November 2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on Marijuana
Marijuana Leaf-smaller.gif
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

A Town of Lakewood Marijuana Retail Ban, Measure 2A ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the town of Lakewood in Jefferson County, Colorado, where it was approved.

Upon its passing, Measure 2A made it illegal to sell marijuana in the city.[1]

Lakewood voters approved Amendment 64, which legalized marijuana, in 2012 by a margin of 60 percent to 40 percent.[2]

Election results

Town of Lakewood, Measure 2A
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 32,907 53.88%
No28,16446.12%

Election results via: Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder

Text of measure

Ballot question

The question on the ballot appeared as:[1]

Shall it be unlawful to operate a retail marijuana store at any location within the City of Lakewood?[3]

Support

Vote Yes on 2A campaign logo

Vote Yes on 2A supported Measure 2A.[4][5]

Arguments in favor

The following statement in support of Measure 2A was produced by the Yes on 2A campaign:[6]


Vote Yes on 2A video, accessed October 26, 2014

The licensing of marijuana establishments is not consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the citizens of Jefferson County. For keeping Lakewood free of retail marijuana stores, vote for ballot question 2A. For stronger protection for our kids. More than 10% of Colorado kids between 12 and 17 already use marijuana. Protect our kids. Strengthen Lakewood. Vote for 2A.[3]

Vote Yes on 2A[5]

Opposition

Responsible Lakewood campaign image

A group called Responsible Lakewood campaigned in opposition to Measure 2A.[7]

The Marijuana Policy Project also endorsed a "no" vote on Measure 2A.[1]

Arguments against

Opponents of 2A argued that retail marijuana produces a large amount of tax revenue that would just go to Denver if voters decided to ban it in the city. They argued that people would continue to use and sell pot in the city, but that it would not be as regulated and would not form a tax-revenue producing industry that benefits the city as marijuana could be if Measure 2A is rejected.[7]

Related measures

Recreational

Medical


See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Additional reading

Footnotes