Tucson, Arizona, Sales Tax for Early Childhood Education, Proposition 204 (November 2017)
| Proposition 204: Tucson Sales Tax for Early Childhood Education |
|---|
| The basics |
| Election date: |
| November 7, 2017 |
| Status: |
| Topic: |
| Local sales tax Expires in: Never |
| Related articles |
| Local sales tax on the ballot November 7, 2017 ballot measures in Arizona Pima County, Arizona ballot measures City tax on the ballot |
| See also |
| Tucson, Arizona Municipal elections in Tucson, Arizona (2017) |
A sales tax measure to fund early childhood education, Proposition 204, was on the ballot for Tucson voters in Pima County, Arizona, on November 7, 2017. It was defeated.
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of enacting a 0.5 percent (half-cent) sales tax with no expiration date to fund an early childhood education financial aid program and establishing a commission to oversee the program. The initiative was designed to amend both the city charter and the city code. |
| A no vote was a vote against enacting a 0.5 percent (half-cent) sales tax with no expiration date to fund an early childhood education financial aid program and establishing a commission to oversee the program. The initiative was designed to amend both the city charter and the city code. |
Proponents called this initiative the Strong Start Tucson initiative.
Overview
Sales taxes in Tucson
The total sales tax rate in Tucson was 8.6 percent as of July 1, 2017—a 5.6 percent statewide tax, a 0.5 percent county tax, and a 2.5 percent city-level tax. The average total sales tax rate in the 15 largest cities in Arizona was 8.37 percent as of July 1, 2017. The average city-level component in the 15 largest cities in the state was 2.03 percent as of July 1, 2017 percent. The approval of Proposition 204 would increase the city-level component to 3 percent and the total sales tax rate in Tucson to 9.1 percent.[1]
Another sales tax of 0.1 percent to fund the Reid Park Zoo was also on the ballot as Proposition 202—an authorizing charter amendment—and Proposition 203—the implementation in city code. These zoo sales tax propositions were also put on the ballot through citizen initiative petitions.
Tucson voters approved a 0.5 percent sales tax on May 16, 2017, to fund public safety and roads, raising the city-level sales tax rate from 2 percent to 2.5 percent for five years. This 0.5 percent tax was set to expire on June 30, 2022.
Revenue distribution
Proposition 204 earmarked 92 percent of the estimated $50 million in annual revenue from the 0.5 percent tax for providing financial aid for preschool. The initiative was written to restrict administrative expenses of the program to eight percent of revenue. Moreover, no more than 10 percent of the revenue—taken from the 92 percent of non-administrative spending—could have been used to "support and improve the quality of Tucson-based early-childhood programs eligible to participate in Strong Start Tucson."[1][2]
Strong Start Tucson Commission
Proposition 204 was designed to establish a seven-member Strong Start Tucson Commission tasked with running the financial aid program for preschool funded by the 0.5 percent sales tax. Under the initiative, the following rules would have applied to commission members:[1]
- the members would have needed to be volunteers;
- the members would have been appointed by the city council and mayor;
- the members would have served four-year terms, with four of the first seven appointed to two-year terms to stagger term endings;
- the members would have been limited to serving no more than eight consecutive years on the commission;
- the members would have needed to include early childhood teachers, education advocates, education experts, parents of students, and representatives of the business and non-profit communities;
- at least two of the members would have needed to be early-education experts; and
- no more than two of the members could have been early-education providers.
Election results
| Proposition 204 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 53,845 | 65.44% | |||
| Yes | 28,435 | 34.56% | ||
- Election results from Pima County Elections Office
Text of measure
Official title
The official ballot title for Proposition 204 was as follows:[1]
| “ |
Proposing amendments to the Tucson Charter, Chapter IV, and Tucson Code, Chapters 10A and 19, to authorize and impose a half-cent (0.5%) transaction privilege (sales) tax, with revenues dedicated to funding early-childhood education through a financial aid program to be known as Strong Start Tucson and overseen by a commission appointed by Mayor and Council.[3] |
” |
Descriptive title
The official descriptive title provided on the ballot was as follows:[1]
| “ |
Authorizing and imposing a half-cent (0.5%) transaction privilege (sales) tax, with revenues dedicated to early-childhood education through a financial aid program to be known as Strong Start Tucson and overseen by a commission appointed by Mayor and Council. Proposed amendments to the Tucson Charter Chapter IV and Tucson Code Chapters 10A and 19, submitted by initiative, authorizing and imposing a half-cent (0.5%) transaction privilege (sales) tax, with revenues dedicated to funding early-childhood education through a financial aid program to be known as Strong Start Tucson and overseen by a commission appointed by Mayor and Council. A “YES” vote shall have the effect of authorizing and imposing a half-cent (0.5%) transaction privilege (sales) tax, with revenues dedicated to funding early-childhood education through a financial aid program known as Strong Start Tucson and overseen by a commission appointed by Mayor and Council. A “NO” vote shall have the effect of rejecting the half-cent (0.5%) transaction privilege (sales) tax for early-childhood education.[3] |
” |
Full text
The full text of Proposition 204 is available here.
Support
The group Strong Start Tucson ran the campaign in support of the initiative.[4]
Supporters
A list of organizations and individuals who endorsed Proposition 204 or sponsored arguments in favor of the initiative is below.[5]
Argument sponsors
Besides Strong Start Tucson, the following organizations or individuals paid to include arguments in favor of Proposition 204 in the ballot information:[1]
|
|
Organizations
- Amani Academy, Inc.
- Amistades Inc.
- Arizona Child Care Association (ACCA)
- Arizona's Children Association - The Parent Connection
- Arizona Early Childhood Education Association
- Arizona NOW PAC (National Organization for Women)
- Association of Early Learning Leaders
- Casa de los Ninos
- Catalina In-home Services
- Catholic Community Services
- Center for Economic Integrity
- Child & Family Resources, Inc.
- Children’s Action Alliance
- Children’s Clinics
- Child Language Center, University of AZ
- Comcast
- Community Foundation For Southern Arizona (CFSAz)
- Desert Springs Children's Center
- Downtown Community School
- The Drawing Studio
- Early Childhood Development Group
- El Rio Community Health
- Fix It Pro
- 4th Ave Deli
- Idea School
- KinderCare Education
- Kids First Preschool – Pima
- Kingfisher Restaurant
- Kino School
- LeCroy & Milligan Associates Inc.
- Literacy Connects
- Lonesome Desert Records
- Love Everyday Foundation
- Make Way for Books
- Meow Magazine
- Mi Familia Vota
- Ohio Children's Foundation
- Orange Grove Pediatrics
- Our Family Services
- Outer Limits School
- Pima County Democratic Education Caucus
- Pima Area Labor Federation
- The Sandbox Early Childhood Learning Center Tucson Community School
- SAZAEYC - Southern Arizona Association for the Education of Young Children
- Second Street School
- Small Miracles
- Southern Arizona Grandparent Ambassadors
- UFCW Local 99
- United Way’s First Focus on Kids Coalition
- YWCA of Tucson and Southern Arizona
Individuals
- Linda Laird, chair, Arizona Legislative District 2 Democrats
- Andrés Cano, chair, Arizona Legislative District 3 Democrats
- Terry Connolly, Emeritus Professor, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona
- Ron Marx, dean, UA College of Education
- Kristel Ann Foster, TUSD governing board
- Sen. David Bradley (D-10)
- Sen. Andrea Dalessandro (D-2)
- Rep. Rosanna Gabaldón (D-2)
- Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-3)
- Lisa Ordóñez Crooms, vice dean and professor, University of Arizona
- Demion Clinco, Pima Community College governing board
- Rep. Randy Friese (D-9)
Arguments in favor
The following proponents of Proposition 203 paid to have each argument listed below included within the ballot information:[1]
Strong Start Tucson:
Joel Feinman, a defense attorney:
Nicholas Clement, Ernest McFarland Citizen's Chair in Education Northern Arizona University:
Terry Connolly, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus at Eller College, University of Arizona
Early Childhood Development Group:
Linda Horowitz:
Southern Arizona Association for the Education of Young Children (SAZAEYC):
Karin Uhlich, Tucson City Council member:
Chet Hedden, Ph.D., and Erin Lyons:
Casa de los Niños:
Make Way For Books:
Mary Belle McCorkle:
Eve Shapiro, Orange Grove Pediatrics:
Strong Start Tucson Political Committee:
Dr. Renee T. Clift, professor at the University of Arizona:
Blanca N. Bergeron and Minerva Navarro, early childhood educators:
Eleanor Droegemeier, retired teacher and regional director of First Things First:
Ann W. Nichols and Laura Jasso of the Southern Arizona Grandparent Ambassadors Steering Committee:
Children’s Action Alliance:
|
| No on Prop 204 ad |
Opposition
No on Prop 204 ran the campaign in opposition to Proposition 204.[6]
Opponents
The following individuals and organizations paid to sponsor the inclusion of the arguments against Proposition 204 in the ballot information:
- The Pima County Republican Party
- June Webb-Vignery
- Tucson Metro Chamber
- Luke Knipe
Arguments against
The following opponents of Proposition 202 paid to have each argument listed below included within the ballot information:[1]
The Pima County Republican Party:
June Webb-Vignery:
Tucson Metro Chamber:
Luke Knipe:
|
Campaign finance
| Total campaign contributions: | |
| Support: | $339,241.12 |
| Opposition: | $334,812.17 |
One political action committee, Strong Start Tucson, was registered in support of Proposition 204 as of October 26, 2017. The committee had raised $339,241 and had spent $272,553. The top two donors were Child and Family Resources and Ohio's Children's Foundation, which were responsible for 41 percent of campaign funding.[7]
One political action committee, No on Prop 204, was registered in opposition to Proposition 204 as of October 27, 2017. The committee had raised $334,812.17 and had spent $305,788.52. The top three donors were Jim Click Jr., Southern Arizona Leadership, and Hotel Corp of Downtown Tucson. No on Prop 204 had also received a loan from Jim Click in the amount of $36,000. This loan is not included in the campaign finance totals below. If this loan is forgiven rather than being repaid, it will be included in the contribution totals.[8]
Support
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Top donors
| Donor | Cash | In-kind | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child and Family Resources | $93,308 | $0 | $93,308 |
| Ohio's Children's Foundation | $90,000 | $0 | $90,000 |
| Literacy Connects | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 |
| Catholic Community Services | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 |
| Eric and Andrea Schindler | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 |
| United Food and Commercial Worker's Union Local 99 | $16,000 | $0 | $16,000 |
Opposition
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Top donors
| Donor | Cash | In-kind | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Click Jr. | $30,000 | $0 | $30,000 |
| Tucson New Car Dealers Association | $28,629.37 | $0 | $28,629.37 |
| Southern Arizona Leadership | $25,000 | $0 | $25,000 |
| Hotel Corp of Downtown Tucson | $25,000 | $0 | $25,000 |
| Vocational Training Institutes, ICC | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 |
| Diamond Ventures | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 |
| Tuttle-Click Automotive Group | $14,593.35 | $0 | $14,593.35 |
Media editorials
Support
- Tucson Weekly: "Isn't it time we took better care of Tucson's preschoolers? Prop 204, aka Strong Start Tucson, seeks to do just that by raising the sales tax by a half-cent per dollar to fund scholarships for 3- and 4-year-old kids. [...] This is your chance, Tucson. Give our kids a better start to life."[9]
If you know of another endorsement by the editorial board of a media outlet that belongs here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Opposition
- Arizona Daily Star: "We would like to be able to endorse Proposition 204 and there are reasons to do so [...] But, in light of serious concerns and questions about its parameters and governance structure, we find ourselves unable to recommend it. [...] we are not convinced this is the best, or only, way to improve early childhood education opportunities in the Tucson area."[10]
If you know of another endorsement by the editorial board of a media outlet that belongs here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Background
In Arizona, the state, counties, and municipalities levy sales taxes. As of October 1, 2017, the average total sales tax of the 15 largest cities in Arizona was 8.37 percent. The total sales tax in Tucson was 8.60 percent. The average city sales tax was 2.04 percent. Tucson's city sales tax was 2.50 percent as of July 1, 2017.[11]
| Municipality | State tax | County tax | City tax | Total tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix | 5.60% | 0.70% | 2.30% | 8.60% |
| Tucson | 5.60% | 0.50% | 2.50% | 8.60% |
| Mesa | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.75% | 8.05% |
| Chandler | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.50% | 7.80% |
| Glendale | 5.60% | 0.70% | 2.90% | 9.20% |
| Scottsdale | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.65% | 7.95% |
| Gilbert | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.50% | 7.80% |
| Tempe | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.80% | 8.10% |
| Peoria | 5.60% | 0.70% | 1.80% | 8.10% |
| Surprise | 5.60% | 0.70% | 2.20% | 8.50% |
| Yuma | 5.60% | 1.11% | 1.70% | 8.41% |
| Avondale | 5.60% | 0.70% | 2.50% | 8.80% |
| Flagstaff | 5.60% | 1.30% | 2.051% | 8.951% |
| Goodyear | 5.60% | 0.70% | 2.50% | 8.80% |
| Lake Havasu City | 5.60% | 0.25% | 2.00% | 7.85% |
Path to the ballot
This measure was put on the ballot through a successful initiative petition campaign.
To place an initiative petition on the November 2017, ballot, petitioners needed to collect at least 9,241 valid signatures by July 6, 2017. Supporters of Proposition 204—known as Initiative 2016-submitted about 25,000 unverified signatures by the deadline to qualify for the ballot.[12][4]
Other elections
Other propositions
- See also: Pima County, Arizona ballot measures
There were four Tucson city propositions on the ballot on November 7, 2017. The Tucson Unified School District also put a bond proposition on the ballot.
• Proposition 202: Tucson Reid Park Zoo Sales Tax Authorization Charter Amendment ![]()
• Proposition 203: Tucson Reid Park Zoo Sales Tax Implementation Initiative ![]()
• Proposition 204: Tucson Sales Tax for Early Childhood Education ![]()
• Proposition 406: Charter Amendment to Increase Mayoral and City Council Salaries ![]()
City council seats
The city of Tucson, Arizona, held elections for three seats on the city council on November 7, 2017. A primary election took place on August 29, 2017. Paul Durham advanced from the Ward 3 Democratic primary to face independent candidate Gary Watson in the race to replace Karin Uhlich (D). In Ward 6, incumbent Steve Kozachik (D) faces challengers Mariano Rodriguez (R) and Mike Cease (G).
To read more about the city council seat races, including the candidates' positions on the 2017 ballot propositions, read Ballotpedia's coverage of Tucson's municipal elections here.
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Tucson early childhood education sales tax Proposition 204. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
|
External links
Support |
Opposition |
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 City of Tucson, Arizona, "The Choice...Is Yours," accessed October 13, 2017
- ↑ News 4 Tucson, "N4T Investigators: Proposition 204," September 12, 2017
- ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Arizona Daily Star', "25,000 signatures gathered to get preschool scholarships on the November ballot," July 6, 2017
- ↑ Strong Start Tucson, "Endorsements," accessed August 21, 2017
- ↑ No on Prop 204, "Home," accessed October 20, 2017
- ↑ Tucson City Government, "Strong Start Tucson PAC Campaign Finance Reports," accessed October 26, 2017
- ↑ Tucson City Government, "No on Prop 204 PAC Campaign Finance Reports," accessed October 31, 2017
- ↑ Tucson Weekly, "Think of the Children," October 19, 2017
- ↑ Arizona Daily Star, "Star Opinion: A reluctant 'no' on Strong Start Tucson's Prop. 204," October 15, 2017
- ↑ Arizona Department of Revenue, "Transaction Privilege (Sales) Tax Rate Tables & Code Bridge," accessed October 8, 2017
- ↑ Tucson City Clerk's Office, "Initiative and Referendum Petition Signature and Filing Requirements," accessed August 21, 2017
| |||||||||||||
