Maricopa County, Arizona ballot measures
| Maricopa County |
|---|
|
| Election Department |
| Historical election results Voter registration |
|
Maricopa County is one of the 15 counties in Arizona and the largest county by population in the state. The director of the Maricopa County Elections department is Adrian Fontes . The elections department is responsible for coordinating and administering primary and general elections.
2025
- See also: Arizona 2025 local ballot measures
November 4
A "yes" vote supports amending the city charter to limit city council and mayoral term limits to two consecutive four-year terms for each and sixteen years of consecutive service and establishes a limit when there are two years or less between service as councilmember and mayor requiring four years to elapse before seeking either office. |
A "no" vote opposes amending the city charter to clarify city council and mayoral term limits. |
A "yes" vote supports amending the city charter to clarify that the city council may determine the term of the city manager and the severance pay in the event of termination. |
A "no" vote opposes amending the city charter to clarify that the city council may determine the term of the city manager and the severance pay in the event of termination. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 1, Parks and Recreation Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $158 million in bonds to improve parks and recreational facilities and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $158 million in bonds to improve parks and recreational facilities and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $88 million in bonds to fund improvements to fire department facilities and equipment and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $88 million in bonds to fund improvements to fire department facilities and equipment and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $46 million in bonds to fund improvements to police department facilities and equipment and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $46 million in bonds to fund improvements to police department facilities and equipment and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 4, Transportation and Infrastructure Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $183 million in bonds to fund improvements to transportation and infrastructure, including streets, avenues, alleys, and highways. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $183 million in bonds to fund improvements to transportation and infrastructure, including streets, avenues, alleys, and highways. |
A "yes" vote supports issuing $271.5 million in bonds to fund the purchase of lots and transportation vehicles, construction of buildings, supply of furniture and technology, and other needs of the public education system, to be repaid with a property tax increase of $315.10 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $271.5 million in bonds to fund the public education system, to be repaid with an increase in property taxes. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Chandler Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, maintaining the property tax rate of $109 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Chandler Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, maintaining the property tax rate of $109 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Deer Valley Unified School District to renew its 15% maintenance and operation budget override for seven years, funded through a secondary property tax estimated at $0.89 per $100 of assessed valuation (equivalent to $8.90 per $1,000 of assessed value). |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Deer Valley Unified School District to renew its 15% maintenance and operation budget override for seven years, funded through a secondary property tax estimated at $0.89 per $100 of assessed valuation. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Deer Valley Unified School District to sell all or part of a property measuring 19 acres in the West Wing Mountain Area to fund the purchase of school sites and vehicles, construction and furnishing of buildings, and any other permitted expense. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Deer Valley Unified School District to sell all or part of a property measuring 19 acres in the West Wing Mountain Area to fund the purchase of school sites and vehicles, construction and furnishing of buildings, and any other permitted expense. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Dysart Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $113.48 per $100,00 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Dysart Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $113.48 per $100,00 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports issuing $127 million in bonds and increasing local property taxes by $32.00 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund capital improvements to the Dysart Unified School District, specifically:
|
A "no" vote opposes issuing $127 million in bonds and increasing local property taxes by $32.00 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund capital improvements to the Dysart Unified School District. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Fowler Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $23.66 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Fowler Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $23.66 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 1, Flood Control Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $30 million in bonds to fund flood control projects, including improving storm water lines and drains, flood control channels, and water retention and detention basins, and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $30 million in bonds to fund flood control projects, including improving storm water lines and drains, flood control channels, and water retention and detention basins, and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 2, City Operations Facilities Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to issue $35 million in bonds to fund construction and improvements to city operations facilities and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to issue $35 million in bonds to fund construction and improvements to city operations facilities and levying a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Higley Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $127.62 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Higley Unified School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $127.62 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Higley Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange all or part of a property measuring about 19 acres in the Gateway Pointe Area of Gilbert, Arizona, to fund the purchase of school sites and vehicles, construction and furnishing of buildings, and any other permitted expense. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Higley Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange all or part of a property measuring about 19 acres in the Gateway Pointe Area of Gilbert, Arizona, to fund the purchase of school sites and vehicles, construction and furnishing of buildings, and any other permitted expense. |
A "yes" vote supports issuing $10 million in bonds to fund the acquisition of furniture, technology, and other equipment for school facilities, to be repaid with a property tax increase of $101.53 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $10 million in bonds to fund the acquisition of furniture, technology, and other equipment for school facilities, to be repaid with a property tax increase of $101.53 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Isaac Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $255.98 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Isaac Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $255.98 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the Kyrene Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $52.49 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the Kyrene Elementary School District to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next seven fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $52.49 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports issuing $898 million in bonds to fund healthcare facilities in Maricopa County, resulting in an estimated annual tax rate of $108 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $898 million in bonds to fund healthcare facilities in Maricopa County, resulting in an estimated annual tax rate of $108 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports adopting a budget which includes an amount for capital purposes that exceeds its district's additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $500,000 or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit. |
A "no" vote opposes adopting a budget which includes an amount for capital purposes that exceeds its district's additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $500,000 or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to issue $60 million in bonds to fund facility and capital improvements and levy a tax at an estimated rate of $50.42 per $100,000 of limited property value to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to issue $60 million in bonds to fund facility and capital improvements and levy a tax at an estimated rate of $50.42 per $100,000 of limited property value to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next six fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $130 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit for the next six fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $130 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the district to exceed its maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, thereby continuing existing budget levels, and levying property taxes at a rate of $57 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the district to exceed its maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, thereby continuing existing budget levels, and levying property taxes at a rate of $57 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
• Phoenix Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Increase Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to increase the budget by the lesser of $3,000,000 or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit and levying a tax at a rate of $32 per $100,000 of limited property value to fund the increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to increase the budget by the lesser of $3,000,000 or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit and levying a tax at a rate of $32 per $100,000 of limited property value to fund the increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to sell, lease, or exchange in whole or in part specific school parcels and using the proceeds to fund capital expenditures. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to sell, lease, or exchange in whole or in part specific school parcels and using the proceeds to fund capital expenditures. |
• Phoenix Union High School District, Arizona, Question 1, Budget Increase Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to increase the district's budget by the lesser of $21 million or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levy a tax to fund the increase at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to increase the district's budget by the lesser of $21 million or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levy a tax to fund the increase at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to increase the district budget by 15% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levying a tax at a rate of $45 per $100,000 of limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to increase the district budget by 15% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levying a tax at a rate of $45 per $100,000 of limited property value. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to exceed its maintenance and operations budget by 15% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levying property taxes of $92 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to exceed its maintenance and operations budget by 15% of the district’s revenue control limit for six fiscal years and levying property taxes of $92 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
• Tempe Elementary School District, Arizona, Facilities Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to issue $196.5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements and levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to issue $196.5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements and levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Tolleson Union High School District, Arizona, Question 1, Facilities Bond Measure (November 2025):
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to issue $125 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements and levy a tax to repay them. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to issue $125 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements and levy a tax to repay them. |
A "yes" vote supports allowing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit by 15% for the next six fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $77 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
A "no" vote opposes allowing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the legal revenue control limit by 15% for the next six fiscal years, resulting in a property tax rate of $77 per $100,000 in limited property value. |
May 20
• Glendale, Arizona, Proposition 401, Change to City General Plan Map Initiative (May 2025): ✖
A "yes" vote supported making changes to the city's General Plan to rezone property located south of Cardinals Way between 95th Avenue and 94th Avenue from "parks and open space" to "corporate commerce center." |
A "no" vote opposed making changes to the city's General Plan to rezone property located south of Cardinals Way between 95th Avenue and 94th Avenue from "parks and open space" to "corporate commerce center." |
A "yes" vote supported conditionally rezoning a part of VAI Resort, Centerpoint Planned Area Development (PAD). |
A "no" vote opposed conditionally rezoning a part of VAI Resort, Centerpoint Planned Area Development (PAD). |
2024
- See also: Arizona 2024 local ballot measures
November 5
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Agua Fria Union High School District to issue $138,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Agua Fria Union High School District to issue $138,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Alhambra Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $235 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Alhambra Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $235 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to issue $18,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30.56 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to issue $18,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30.56 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $61 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $61 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Chandler Unified School District to issue $487,450,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40.65 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Chandler Unified School District to issue $487,450,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40.65 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Creighton Elementary School District to issue $85,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $68.94 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Creighton Elementary School District to issue $85,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $68.94 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to issue $325,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $67.73 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to issue $325,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $67.73 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $93 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $93 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Dysart Unified School District to issue $127,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Dysart Unified School District to issue $127,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports permanently adjusting the city's expenditure limit by $1.5 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently adjusting the city's expenditure limit by $1.5 million. |
A "yes" vote supports excluding capital projects and land expenditures from the city's state-mandated expenditure limit. |
A "no" vote opposes excluding capital projects and land expenditures from the city's state-mandated expenditure limit. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $118 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $118 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
• Gilbert Unified School District, Arizona, Question 2, District Site Sale Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange the designated property to fund school projects. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange the designated property to fund school projects. |
A "yes" vote supported providing a minimum wage of $20.00 per hour for hotel and event center workers and adopting other labor regulations. |
A "no" vote opposed providing a minimum wage of $20.00 per hour for hotel and event center workers and adopting other labor regulations. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Glendale Union High School District to issue $195,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $47.46 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Glendale Union High School District to issue $195,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $47.46 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Higley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $140 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Higley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $140 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Higley Unified School District to issue $83,100,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $32.85 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Higley Unified School District to issue $83,100,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $32.85 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Isaac Elementary School District, Arizona, Question, District Site Sale Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Isaac Elementary School District to sell, lease, or exchange property to fund school necessities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Isaac Elementary School District to sell, lease, or exchange property to fund school necessities. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to issue $50,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $65.83 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to issue $50,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $65.83 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to override the General Maintenance and Operation Budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $229 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to override the General Maintenance and Operation Budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $229 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Laveen Elementary School District to override the district additional assistance budget by 10% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $203 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Laveen Elementary School District to override the district additional assistance budget by 10% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $203 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported continuing the transportation excise (sales) tax in Maricopa County for 20 years, with revenues allocated to freeways and highways (40.5%), public transportation (37%), arterial and streets and infrastructure (22.5%). |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the transportation excise (sales) tax in Maricopa County for 20 years. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Permanent Adjustment to City Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports permanently increasing the city's base expenditure limit by $148 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently increasing the city's base expenditure limit by $148 million, thereby maintaining the existing expenditure limit established in 1979-1980. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 2, Public Safety Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports issuing $90 million in bonds to fund public safety facility improvements and construction, replace fire engines, expand the city's fiber network, and road improvements. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $90 million in bonds to fund public safety facility improvements and construction, replace fire engines, expand the city's fiber network, and road improvements. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 3, Recreational Facilities Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports issuing $170 million in bonds to fund construction of recreational facilities, install water conservation at city parks, construct a new aquatic center, renovate the historic Sirrine House, and renovate the i.d.e.a. Museum. |
A "no" vote supports issuing $170 million in bonds to fund construction of recreational facilities, install water conservation at city parks, construct a new aquatic center, renovate the historic Sirrine House, and renovate the i.d.e.a. Museum. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 4, General Plan Ratification Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports ratifying the city's general plan, which includes a vision statement, core values, guiding principles regarding resource management, public safety, and public services. |
A "no" vote opposes ratifying the city's general plan, which includes a vision statement, core values, guiding principles regarding resource management, public safety, and public services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Peoria Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27.27 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Peoria Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27.27 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 487, Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the mayor and city council by majority vote to establish the local expenditure limit. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the mayor and city council by majority vote to establish the local expenditure limit, thereby requiring the city to operate under the state-imposed expenditure limitation formula based on 1979-1980 expenditures adjusted for inflation. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 488, General Plan Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported adopting the General Plan providing direction on city development, conservation, and infrastructure investments. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting the General Plan providing direction on city development, conservation, and infrastructure investments. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 489, Elected City Officials' Salaries Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports increasing the mayor's salary to $103,840 per year and the city council members' salaries to $77,000. |
A "no" vote opposes increasing the mayor's salary to $103,840 per year and the city council members' salaries to $77,000. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Queen Creek Unified School District to override the maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $143 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Queen Creek Unified School District to override the maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $143 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Roosevelt Elementary School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $72.47 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Roosevelt Elementary School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $72.47 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to enact a sales tax at a rate of 0.15% for 30 years, beginning on July 1, 2025, to fund parks and recreational facilities, maintenance of the McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and increase police and fire resources related to parks. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to enact a sales tax at a rate of 0.15% for 30 years, beginning on July 1, 2025, when the existing 0.20% sales tax rate is set to expire. |
• Scottsdale, Arizona, Proposition 491, Increase Base Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports permanently adjusting the city's base expenditure limit by $22 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently adjusting the city's base expenditure limit by $22 million. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the revenue control limit of the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $51 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the revenue control limit of the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $51 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the district additional assistance budget by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the district additional assistance budget by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $98 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $98 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to exceed the district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $59 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to exceed the district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $59 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to issue $10,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improving the school infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to issue $10,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improving the school infrastructure. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15%, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $75 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund any budget increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15%, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $75 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund any budget increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to adopt a budget that exceeds an amount for capital purposes by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for 6 years, and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to adopt a budget that exceeds an amount for capital purposes by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for 6 years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
2023
- See also: Arizona 2023 local ballot measures
November 7
• Alhambra Elementary School District, Arizona, School Site Sale Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Alhambra Elementary School District No. 68 to sell or lease parcels of property and to use the proceeds to purchase school sites and student transportation. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Alhambra Elementary School District No. 68 to sell or lease parcels of property and to use the proceeds to purchase school sites and student transportation. |
• Deer Valley Unified School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Question (November 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $325 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of construction and renovation of school buildings, improving property, and other uses. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $325 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of construction and renovation of school buildings, improving property, and other uses. |
• Deer Valley Unified School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Override Measure (November 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supported continuing for six years the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority for a budget that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $980 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing for six years the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority for a budget that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $980 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Fowler Elementary School District, Arizona, Maintenance and Budget Override Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Fowler Elementary School District to continue for six years the general maintenance and operation budget override authority, which includes an amount that exceeds 15% revenue control limit, and levying property taxes at a rate of $740 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Fowler Elementary School District to continue for six years the general maintenance and operation budget override authority, which includes an amount that exceeds 15% revenue control limit, and levying property taxes at a rate of $740 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Gilbert Public School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $100 million in bonds for the purpose of school improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $100 million in bonds for the purpose of school improvements. |
• Gilbert Public School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Override Measure (November 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supported continuing for six years the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority, which includes an amount that exceeds the District’s revenue control limit of 15%. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing for six years the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority, which includes an amount that exceeds the District’s revenue control limit of 15%. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 1, Street and Intersection Projects Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $82,000,000 in bonds to fund improvements to streets and intersections including construction and reconstruction of major and local streets, bridges, and highways, congestion reduction, street widening, signage, lighting, and landscaping; and authorizing the city to collect an additional property tax to pay for the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $82,000,000 in bonds to fund improvements to streets and intersections and levying an additional property tax to pay for the bonds. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 2, Public Safety Projects Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $78,000,000 in bonds to fund public safety projects including improvements to police and fire facilities and equipment and authorizing the city to collect an additional property tax to pay for the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $78,000,000 in bonds to fund public safety projects and levying an additional property tax to pay for the bonds. |
• Glendale Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Glendale Elementary School District Governing Board to issue $40 million in bonds for the purpose of school improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Glendale Elementary School District Governing Board to issue $40 million in bonds for the purpose of school improvements. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override authority and tax that includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $2,350 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override authority and tax that includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $2,350 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Glendale Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 3, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to adopt a budget that includes an amount that exceeds the additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $6,200,000 or 10% of the District’s revenue control limit. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to adopt a budget that includes an amount that exceeds the additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $6,200,000 or 10% of the District’s revenue control limit. |
• Glendale Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 4, District Property Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to sell, lease, or exchange certain parcels of property, and using the proceeds to improve or construct school sites or purchase school transportation. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to sell, lease, or exchange certain parcels of property, and using the proceeds to improve or construct school sites or purchase school transportation. |
• Kyrene Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $161 million in general obligation bonds for the purpose of constructing and renovating buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $161 million in general obligation bonds for the purpose of constructing and renovating buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Kyrene Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $8,500,000 or 10% of the revenue control limit. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds the additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $8,500,000 or 10% of the revenue control limit. |
• Madison Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $105 million in general obligation bonds for the purpose of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $105 million in general obligation bonds for the purpose of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Madison Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override and resulting tax, which includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $420 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override and resulting tax, which includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $420 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Mesa Unified School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the district to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of construction and renovation of school buildings, improving property, and other uses. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of construction and renovation of school buildings, improving property, and other uses. |
• Mesa Unified School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override authority and resulting tax, which includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $1,630 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to continue for six years their general maintenance and operation budget override authority and resulting tax, which includes an amount that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $1,630 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Osborn Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $100 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of renovating and constructing school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $100 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of renovating and constructing school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Osborn Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds its district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $1.5 million or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the district to adopt a budget that exceeds its district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $1.5 million or 10% of the district’s revenue control limit. |
• Paradise Valley Unified School District, Arizona, Bond Question (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $340 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $340 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Pendergast Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 1, Bond Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating school buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Pendergast Elementary School District, Arizona, Question 2, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing for six years the general maintenance and operations budget override authority that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing for six years the general maintenance and operations budget override authority that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $214,000,000 in bonds for fire, police, roadway and pedestrian infrastructure projects. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $214,000,000 in bonds for fire, police, roadway and pedestrian infrastructure projects. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $108,615,000 in general obligation bonds for the purposes of funding for libraries, parks, and historic preservation projects. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $108,615,000 in general obligation bonds for the purposes of funding for libraries, parks, and historic preservation projects. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $114,385,000 in general obligation bonds for the purposes of funding for education, arts and museums, economic development, and reducing waste. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $114,385,000 in general obligation bonds for the purposes of funding for education, arts and museums, economic development, and reducing waste. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $63,000,000 in general obligation bonds for constructing and repairing affordable housing, as well as renovating existing senior centers. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $63,000,000 in general obligation bonds for constructing and repairing affordable housing, as well as renovating existing senior centers. |
• Phoenix Union High School District, Arizona, Bond Question (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $475 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $475 million in general obligation bonds for the purposes of constructing and renovating buildings, improving property, and other purposes. |
• Scottsdale Unified School District, Arizona, Budget Measure (November 2023): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing for six years the general maintenance and operations budget override authority that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $330 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing for six years the general maintenance and operations budget override authority that exceeds the revenue control limit of 15%, and levying property taxes at a rate of $330 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
May 16
A "yes" vote supported approving the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
A "no" vote opposed approving the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
• Tempe, Arizona, Proposition 302, Rezoning for Sports and Entertainment District Measure (May 2023): ✖
A "yes" vote supported rezoning 53 South Priest Drive, which would facilitate the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
A "no" vote opposed rezoning 53 South Priest Drive, which would facilitate the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the mayor to execute a Development and Disposition Agreement with Bluebird Development LLC, which would facilitate the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the mayor to execute a Development and Disposition Agreement with Bluebird Development LLC, which would facilitate the redevelopment of a city-owned commercially zoned property into a mixed-use project with a professional sports franchise and entertainment district. |
2022
- See also: Arizona 2022 local ballot measures
November 8
A "yes" vote supported continuing the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority and resulting tax. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the existing maintenance and operation budget override authority and resulting tax. |
A "yes" vote supported making an exception for police and firefighters from the city's ban on collective bargaining related to wages, hours, non-health benefits, and working conditions. |
A "no" vote opposed making an exception for police and firefighters from the city's ban on collective bargaining related to wages, hours, non-health benefits, and working conditions. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Proposition 477, Procurement Amounts by Ordinance Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the procurement amount requiring city council approval from $25,000 to an amount set by ordinance. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the procurement amount requiring city council approval from $25,000 to an amount set by ordinance. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Continue the Alternative Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing an alternative expenditure limitation, rather than the state-imposed limit, for Mesa. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing an alternative expenditure limitation for Mesa, thus requiring the state-imposed limit. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 2, Public Safety Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $157.0 million in general obligation bonds for law enforcement, fire services, medical services, and related public safety facilities, equipment, and communications. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $157.0 million in general obligation bonds for law enforcement, fire services, medical services, and related public safety facilities, equipment, and communications. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $97 million in bonds for school improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $97 million in bonds for school improvements. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the governing body of the Phoenix Elementary School District No. 1 to sell, lease or exchange various parcels of real property and to use the proceeds for district purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the governing body of the Phoenix Elementary School District No. 1 to sell, lease or exchange various parcels of real property and to use the proceeds for district purposes. |
A "yes" vote supported adopting a budget which includes an amount for capital purposes that exceeds its district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $14,500,000 or 10% of the District’s revenue control limit. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting a budget which includes an amount for capital purposes that exceeds its district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of $14,500,000 or 10% of the District’s revenue control limit. |
August 2
• Chandler, Arizona, Proposition 470, Continuation of Home Rule Measure (August 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the Home Rule Option alternative expenditure limitation, which increases the amount that the city is allowed to spend for local government operations, for the next four years. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the alternative expenditure limitation for the next four years. |
2021
November 2
- See also: Arizona 2021 local ballot measures
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 1, Parks and Recreation Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $72,985,000 in bonds to construct, improve, and acquire city parks and recreational facilities, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $72,985,000 in bonds to construct, improve, and acquire city parks and recreational facilities. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 2, Fire and Public Safety Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $25,160,000 in bonds to construct, renovate, and equip city fire stations and fire safety-related facilities, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $25,160,000 in bonds to construct, renovate, and equip city fire stations and fire safety-related facilities. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 3, Police and Public Safety Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $55,190,000 in bonds to construct, renovate, and equip city police stations and police-related facilities, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $55,190,000 in bonds to construct, renovate, and equip city police stations and police-related facilities. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 4, Street and Transportation Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $85,780,000 in bonds to acquire, improve, or construct streets, traffic signals, utility lines, shared-use trails, and other transportation projects, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $85,780,000 in bonds to acquire, improve, or construct streets, traffic signals, utility lines, shared-use trails, and other transportation projects. |
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 5, Municipal Buildings Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $33,570,000 in bonds to acquire, improve, or construct municipal buildings including performing arts facilities, office buildings, community centers, and libraries and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $33,570,000 in bonds to acquire, improve, or construct municipal buildings including performing arts facilities, office buildings, community centers, and libraries. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to exceed their maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, thereby continuing existing budget levels, and levying property taxes of $1.24 per $100 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to exceed their maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, thereby allowing the budget override to incrementally expire. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a franchise agreement between Southwest Gas Corporation and the city of Gilbert to maintain the city's gas system and facilities for 25 years. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a franchise agreement between Southwest Gas Corporation and the city of Gilbert for 25 years. |
• Gilbert, Arizona, Question 1, Infrastructure and Transportation Bond Issue (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $515 million in bonds to construct, acquire, and improve streets, roadways, traffic signals, drainage systems, retention basins, and other transportation and infrastructure projects, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $515 million in bonds to construct, acquire, and improve streets, roadways, traffic signals, drainage systems, retention basins, and other transportation and infrastructure projects, and authorizing the city to impose a tax for bond repayment. |
• Scottsdale, Arizona, Proposition 463, City General Plan Ratification Measure (November 2021): ✔
A "yes" vote supported ratifying the city's General Plan passed by the city council and repealing the 2001 General Plan. |
A "no" vote opposed ratifying the city's General Plan passed by the city council and repealing the 2001 General Plan. |
2020
November 3
• Chandler, Arizona, Question 1, Southwest Gas Corporation Franchise (November 2020): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending Chandler's franchise with the Southwest Gas Corporation to maintain the city's gas system and facilities for 25 years. |
A "no" vote opposed extending Chandler's franchise with the Southwest Gas Corporation to maintain the city's gas system and facilities for 25 years. |
A “yes” vote supported Glendale entering into a franchise agreement with APCOR Water Arizona, Inc. to construct, maintain, and operate a water and wastewater utility. |
A “no” vote opposed Glendale entering into a franchise agreement with APCOR Water Arizona, Inc. to construct, maintain, and operate a water and wastewater utility. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 1, Parks and Recreation Projects Bond (November 2020): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing $87.20 million in general obligation bonds for parks and recreation projects. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing $87.20 million in general obligation bonds for parks and recreation projects. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 2, Street Projects Bond (November 2020): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing $81.50 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to streets, highways, and bridges. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing $81.50 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to streets, highways, and bridges. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 3, Landfill Projects Bond (November 2020): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing $9.90 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to designing, constructing, extending, or improving landfills. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing $9.90 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to designing, constructing, extending, or improving landfills. |
• Glendale, Arizona, Question 4, Flood Control Projects Bond (November 2020): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing $9.30 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to flood control and stormwater. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing $9.30 million in general obligation bonds for projects related to flood control and stormwater. |
A "yes" vote supported continuing a property tax—estimated at $19 per $100,000 in assessed value—to provide funds for the Maricopa County Special Health Care District for a period not to exceed 20 years. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing a property tax to provide funds for the Maricopa County Special Health Care District for a period not to exceed 20 years. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Transportation Bond (November 2020): ✔
A "yes" vote supported this measure to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds for transportation-related projects in Mesa and repay the bonds with an estimated property tax increase of $18.00 per $100,000 of assessed residential property value. |
A "no" vote opposed this measure to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds for transportation-related projects in Mesa and repay the bonds with an estimated property tax increase of $18.00 per $100,000 of assessed residential property value. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 444, Continuation of Local Expenditure Limit (November 2020): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing to use a locally defined spending limit, rather than the state-defined spending limit, for an additional four fiscal years. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing to use a locally defined spending limit, thereby requiring the city to use the state-defined spending limit. |
August 4
• Gilbert, Arizona, Proposition 430, 2020 General Plan Ratification (August 2020): ✔
A "yes" vote supports ratifying the 2020 General Plan passed by the city council. |
A "no" vote opposes ratifying the 2020 General Plan passed by the city council, thereby leaving the 2010 General Plan in place. |
March 10
2019
November 5
• Question 1: Scottsdale Bonds for Parks, Recreation, and Senior Services 
• Question 2: Scottsdale Bonds for Community Spaces and Infrastructure
• Question 3: Scottsdale Bonds for Public Safety, Infrastructure, and Technology Projects
• Mesa Unified School District 4 Property Tax and Budget Increase Question
• Chandler Unified School District Bond Authorization Question
• Question 1: Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 Bond Authorization
• Question 2: Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 Budget and Property Tax Increase
• Phoenix Elementary School District No. 1 Budget and Property Tax Increase Question
• Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 Budget Override and Property Tax Question
August 27
• Proposition 105: Phoenix End Light Rail Expansion Initiative 
• Proposition 106: Phoenix Pension Debt Policies and City Budget Growth Limits Initiative
2018
November 6
• Question 1: Scottsdale Transportation Project Transaction Privilege Tax Increase
• Question 1: Mesa Home Rule Alternative Expenditure Limitation
• Question 2: Mesa Public Safety Sales Tax Increase
• Question 3: Mesa Public Safety Bonds
• Question 5: Mesa Sports and Events Complex Expenditures Charter Amendment
• Question 6: Mesa Hotel Tax Increase
• Question 4: Mesa Cultural and Recreational Facility Bonds
• Proposition 420: Scottsdale City Charter Amendment
• Question 1: Gilbert Fire and Police Public Safety Training Facility Bond
• Proposition 419: Phoenix Campaign Donations Charter Amendment
• Mesa Public Schools Bond Issue
• Mesa Public Schools Budget Override
• Question 1: Glendale Union High School District Budget Override
• Question 2: Glendale Elementary School District Budget Override
• Question 1: Glendale Elementary School District Bond Issue
August 28
• Proposition 413: Phoenix Southwest Gas
Corporation Franchise Agreement
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of approving a new franchise agreement with Southwest Gas Corporation for a 25-year term from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2043. |
| A no vote was a vote against approving a new franchise agreement with Southwest Gas Corporation for a 25-year term from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2043. |
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to allow the city council to remove a council member from office by an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the city council for violation of the City of Phoenix Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy. |
| A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to allow the city council to remove a council member from office by an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the city council for violation of the City of Phoenix Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy. |
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of eliminating the unanimous vote requirement for the city council to be able to not print the full text of a charter amendment on the ballot. |
| A no vote was a vote against eliminating the unanimous vote requirement for the city council to be able to not print the full text of a charter amendment on the ballot. |
• Proposition 408: Chandler Alternative Expenditure Limitation Home Rule Option Continuation
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of renewing the Home Rule Option alternative expenditure limitation for four years, which increases the amount that the city is allowed to spend for local government operations. |
| A no vote was a vote against renewing the Home Rule Option alternative expenditure limitation. |
• Question 1: Gilbert Training Facility Land Sale
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of approving the sale of 36.66 acres of real property that was previously used as a public safety training facility. |
| A no vote was a vote against approving the sale of 36.66 acres of real property that was previously used as a public safety training facility. |
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of modifying the timing and frequency of the terms for members of the Citizens’ Commission on Salaries for Elected City Officials from odd to even years to align with even-year elections and to change their appointment from every two years to every four years to coincide with the mayoral election. |
| A no vote was a vote against modifying the timing and frequency of the terms for members of the Citizens’ Commission on Salaries for Elected City Officials from odd to even years to align with even-year elections and to change their appointment from every two years to every four years to coincide with the mayoral election. |
• Proposition 416: Phoenix Random Sample Verification for Initiative and Referendum Charter Amendment
| A yes vote was a vote in favor of authorizing the city clerk to determine the validity of all initiative and referendum petitions by verifying a random sample of 20 percent of all petition signatures. |
| A no vote was a vote against authorizing the city clerk to determine the validity of all initiative and referendum petitions by verifying a random sample of 20 percent of all petition signatures. |
• Proposition 411: Phoenix Even-Year Election Date for Mayor and Council Elections Charter Amendment
A yes vote was a vote in favor of the following:
|
| A no vote was a vote against changing the election date for mayor and city council elections, thereby leaving elections in fall of odd-numbered years and continuing to prohibit city elections to be held concurrently with state elections. |
2015
August 25
City of Phoenix General Plan Ratification, Proposition 100 (August 2015)
City of Phoenix Alternative Expenditure Limitation, Proposition 101 (August 2015)
City of Phoenix Electronic Payments Amendment, Proposition 102 (August 2015)
City of Phoenix Pension Plan Charter Amendment, Proposition 103 (August 2015)
City of Phoenix Comprehensive Transportation Plan Funding, Proposition 104 (August 2015)
City of Chandler Candidate Election Dates Amendment, Proposition 484 (August 2015)
2014
November 4
City of Phoenix Pension Reform Initiative, Proposition 487 (November 2014)
2013
November 5
Question 1: City of Mesa Public Safety Bonds
Question 2: City of Mesa Street and Highway Bonds
Question 1: Dysart School District bond Issue
Question 1: Washington Elementary School District No. 6 Capital Outlay Override
Question 1: Gilbert Unified School District No. 41 Budget Increase Override
Question 1: City of Scottsdale Parks, Libraries and Community Facilities Bond Issue
Question 2: City of Scottsdale Public Safety Bond Issue
Question 3: City of Scottsdale Flood Control Bond Issue
Question 4: City of Scottsdale Transportation, Streets and Trails Bond Issue
Question 5: City of Scottsdale Water Utility Distribution Franchise Authorization
Question 1: Higley Unified School District Bond Issue
Question 1: Fountain Hills Transportation and Street Bonds
Fountain Hills Unified School District No. 98 Capital Override Question (November 2013)
Fountain Hills Unified School District No. 98 Construction Bond Question (November 2013)
March 12
Proposition 201: City of Phoenix Pension Reform
Proposition 202: City of Phoenix Pension Reform
Phoenix City Transit Security Question (March 2013)
Cave Creek Town APS Electricity Franchise Question (March 2013)
Proposition 459: Cave Creek Town Commercial Rezoning Amendment
Tolleson City Home Rule Expenditure Limitation Question (March 2013)
2012
November 6
Mesa City Parks Bond Measure (November 2012)
Peoria School District Bond Measure (November 2012)
Western Maricopa Education Center School Bond Measure (November 2012)
Mesa School District Bond Measure (November 2012)
Tempe Union School District Budget Override (November 2012)
Tempe Union School District Bond Measure (November 2012)
Glendale City Sales Tax Increase Measure (November 2012)
August 28
- Peoria City Charter Amendments, 12 (August 2012) (also in Yavapai County)
March 13
February 6
Gila River Indian Community Freeway Extension Referendum (February 2012)
2011
November 8
El Mirage & Fountain Hills Bond Questions, 2 (November 2011)
Cave Creek School District Levy Override (November 2011)
Phoenix Union High School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Phoenix Union High School District Budget Increase (November 2011)
Agua Fria School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Balsz School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Buckeye School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Creighton School District Budget Overrides, 2 (November 2011)
Fowler School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Gila Bend School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Glendale 40 School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Glendale 205 School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Kyrene School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Liberty School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Littleton School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Madison School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Nadaburg School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Paradise Valley School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Paradise Valley School District Budget Increase (November 2011)
Riverside School District Bond Measure (November 2011)
Roosevelt Valley School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Saddle Mountain School District Budget Override (November 2011)
Tolleson School District Budget Override (November 2011)
August 30
Phoenix City Home Rule Question (August 2011)
Phoenix City Zoning Question (August 2011)
May 17
- See also: May 17, 2011 ballot measures in Arizona
Gilbert Town General Plan Ratification Question (May 2011)
March 8
- See also: March 8, 2011 ballot measures in Arizona
Cave Creek Town Home Rule Question (March 2011)
Carefree Council Term Limits Question, Prop 421 (March 2011)
Carefree Town Property Tax Changes, 2 (March 2011)
Gila Bend Town Home Rules Question, Prop 425 (March 2011)
Youngtown Franchise Agreement Renewals, 2 (March 2011)
R.E. Eck Jr. recall, Apache Junction, Arizona (2011)
2010
November 2
Mesa Home Rule Exemption Question (November 2010)
Mesa City Utility Bond Measures, 4 (November 2010)
Mesa Bed Tax Increase, Cactus League Stadium (November 2010)
Scottsdale City Charter Amendments, 14 (November 2010)
Scottsdale City Capital and Refinancing Bond Questions, 2 (November 2010)
Scottsdale School District Bond Measure (November 2010)
Chandler School District Bond Measure (November 2010)
Tolleson, Cartwright, Creighton, Fowler, Pendergast, Riverside & Wilson School District Budget Overrides, 8 (November 2010)
Kyrene School District Bond & Override Measures, 2 (November 2010)
Peoria, Deer Valley, Liberty, Saddle, Laveen, Tolleson & Buckeye School District Budget Overrides, 7 (November 2010)
Washington School District Bond & Override Measures, 2 (November 2010)
Cartwright, Phoenix & Queen Creek School District Bond Measures, 3 (November 2010)
Gila Bend School District Bond Measure (November 2010)
May 18
- See also: May 18, 2010 ballot measures in Arizona
Tempe Sales Tax Increase Measure (May 2010)
Gilbert, Arizona Tax Increase Referendum (May 2010)
Litchfield Park Property Tax Increase (May 2010)
March 9
- See also: March 9, 2010 ballot measures in Arizona
Scottsdale Tourism Bed Tax Increase (March 2010)
Queen Creek Local Home Rule Expenditure Limitation Option (March 2010)
Maricopa School District Budget Override (March 2010)
Tempe Tourism Bed Tax Increase, Prop 400 (March 2010)
David Schwan recall, Carefree, Arizona, 2010
Dysart School District Budget Override (March 2010)
2009
November 3
Revision of Cave Creek Town Use Land Map, Proposition 400 (November 2009)
Amending of Cave Creek Rezoning Map, Proposition 401 (November 2009)
Cave Creek Walmart referendum, 2009
Avondale City Propositions 300, 400-404 (November 2009)
City of Surprise Questions 1 & 2 (November 2009)
School District Bond Questions, 7 (November 2009)
School District Budget Questions, 29 (November 2009)
May 19
- See also: May 19, 2009 ballot measures in Arizona
Carefree Proposition 403, 2009
Carefree Proposition 404, 2009
March 10
Carefree Length of Town Council Terms (2009)
Mesa Proposition 300 (2009)
External links
| |||||||||||||
