Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 201, Employee Retirement System Charter Amendment (March 2013)
Phoenix Proposition 201 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Local pensions |
|
Status |
|
Type Referral |
|
Phoenix Proposition 201 was on the ballot as a referral in Phoenix on March 12, 2013. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported amending the City of Phoenix Employee Retirement System (COPERS) plan, by:
|
A "no" vote opposed amending the City of Phoenix Employee Retirement System (COPERS) plan. |
A simple majority was required to approve the measure.
Election results
Phoenix Proposition 201 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
81,893 | 79.33% | |||
No | 21,333 | 20.67% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 201 was as follows:
“ | Shall Part I, Chapter XXIV, Artile II, Sections 14.1, 17.3, 19.1, 19.7, 27.1(b), 28.1(b) and 28.1(c) of the Charter of the City of Phoenix be amended, and shall new Sections 2.22 and 2.23 be added to this Article, to reform the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement Plan by creating new terms of participation for employees of the City of Phoenix hired on or after July 1, 2013 who are members of the Retirement Plan as described above? | ” |
Summary statement
English:
“ | This proposition, if adopted, would amend the City Charter to put in place new terms of participation in the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement Plan for employees hired by the City of Phoenix on or after July 1, 2013. More specifically, for these new employees only: (1) the member's contribution rate to the Retirement Plan for each year will be 50 percent; (2) the current Rule of 80 retirement option would be replaced with a Rule of 87 retirement option; (3) the pension multiplier factor applied to various years of service in the calculation of the member's retirement benefits would would be changed from a multiplier that decreases over time to a muliplier that increases over time; (4) the member would not be eligible to receive a month of service credit for any month in which the member had less than 20 days of service; and (5) any minimum pension obligation is eliminated. Additionally, this proposition, if adopted, would allow new employees of the City of Phoenix who prior to July 1, 2011 were allowed to participate in Arizona State Retirement System, and still have contributions and service on record with that System, to participate in the Retirement Plan on the terms that existed prior to these changes.[1] | ” |
En Espanol:
“ | Esta proposición, en caso de adoptarse, enmendaría la Constitución de la Municipalidad para establecer términos nuevos de participación en el Plan para el Retiro de los Empleados de la Municipalidad de Phoenix para aquellos empleados contratados por la Municipalidad de Phoenix a partir del 1.º de julio de 2013. En específico, sólo para estos empleados nuevos: (1) la tasa de contribución del miembro al Plan para el Retiro para cada año será del 50% de la tasa de contribución anual calculada por los actuarios del Plan para el Retiro, y la Municipalidad pagará el otro 50%; (2) la opción de retiro actual correspondiente a la Regla de 80 se reemplazaría con una opción de retiro correspondiente a la Regla de 87 (esto significa que, al sumarse, la edad del miembro y sus años de servicio deben ser iguales o superiores a 87 para que el miembro pueda retirarse de acuerdo con esta opción); (3) el factor multiplicador aplicado a los años de servicio del miembro para el cálculo de sus beneficios de retiro se modificaría de un multiplicador que disminuye con el transcurso del tiempo a un multiplicador que aumenta con el transcurso del tiempo; (4) el miembro no sería elegible para recibir un mes de crédito de servicio por ningún mes en el que tenga menos de 20 días de servicio; y (5) se elimina cualquier obligación de pensión mínima. Además, esta proposición, en caso de adoptarse, permitiría a los empleados nuevos de la Municipalidad de Phoenix, que estaban autorizados a participar en el Sistema para el Retiro del Estado de Arizona antes del 1.º de julio de 2011, y que aún mantienen contribuciones y servicio registrado en dicho sistema, participar en el Plan para el Retiro de acuerdo con los términos que existían con anterioridad a estos cambios.[1] | ” |
Background
The Phoenix city retirement plan cost taxpayers $28 million in 2000 and was estimated to cost $110 million in the 2012 fiscal year. In January 2011, the Phoenix City Council formed a task force, the Pension Reform Task Force, to propose changes to address rising pension costs. The task force held 13 public meetings and several public input sessions. On February 14, 2012, the final recommendations were presented to the city council. The Pension Reform Task Force made these recommendations:[2]
- Continue the city's defined benefit program;
- Institute a 50/50 contribution split between the employees and the city; and
- Increase the retirement age.
In May 2012, the Superior Court of Maricopa County ruled that municipalities in the county, including the city of Phoenix, were not permitted to change the pension plan of any existing employee or retiree. This meant that any changes to the city's pension plans could apply only to newly hired employees. Following the court's ruling, the Phoenix City Council developed three models for changing the city retirement plan, each of which only applied to new hires. The first model mainly adhered to the changes recommended by the Pension Reform Task Force. This model was selected by the council and placed on the ballot as Propositions 201 and 202. The second model put forward for deliberation by the council was the same as the first model except that it added caps on the city's contribution at 10 percent, 7 percent, or 5 percent. The addition of a contribution cap was voted down in a 6-3 vote. Model three proposed a mandatory 401 system with matching 10 percent, 7 percent, or 5 percent contributions from the city.[3]
Path to the ballot
The proposition was referred to the ballot on October 31, 2012, through a unanimous (9-0) vote of the Phoenix City Council.[4]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Arizona
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Arizona.
See also
|
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Pension Reform Task Force Presentation Document (dead link)
- ↑ PENSION REFORM UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATIONS, City Council Report
- ↑ Phoenix Pension Reform FAQ
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Section 565," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona generally observes Mountain Standard Time; however, the Navajo Nation observes daylight saving time. Because of this, Mountain Daylight Time is sometimes observed in Arizona.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Voters," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24A164," accessed August 22, 2024
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Supreme Court allows Arizona voter-registration law requiring proof of citizenship," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Bloomberg Law, "Supreme Court Partly Restores Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law ," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Reuters, "US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ ArizonaElections.gov, "What ID Do I Need to Vote Quiz," accessed March 14, 2023
- ↑ Arizona State Legislature, “Arizona Revised Statutes 16-579,” accessed July 19, 2024
|