Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Home Rule Alternative Expenditure Limitation (November 2018)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Local ballot measure elections in 2018
Question 1: Mesa Home Rule Alternative Expenditure Limitation
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
November 6, 2018
Status:
Approveda Approved
Topic:
City budget
Related articles
City budget on the ballot
November 6, 2018 ballot measures in Arizona
Maricopa County, Arizona ballot measures
City governance on the ballot
See also
Mesa, Arizona

A proposal to continue a local alternative expenditure limitation equal to the city's fiscal-year budget was on the ballot for Mesa voters in Maricopa County, Arizona, on November 6, 2018. It was approved.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of authorizing the city to continue a local alternative expenditure limitation equal to the the city of Mesa's fiscal-year budget.
A no vote was a vote against authorizing the city to continue a local alternative expenditure limitation equal to the the city of Mesa's fiscal-year budget.

Election results

Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Home Rule Alternative Expenditure Limitation (November 2018)

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

80,207 57.86%
No 58,409 42.14%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

Shall Mesa, Arizona be allowed, pursuant to the Arizona State Constitution, to continue a local alternative expenditure limitation, equal to the City's fiscal-year budget, established by the Mayor and City Council through the annual budget process?[2]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available here.

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Arizona

This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the governing officials of Mesa, Arizona.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. City of Mesa, "Text of Measures As They Will Appear On Ballot," accessed August 9, 2018
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.