Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Arizona 2024 local ballot measures
| Arizona Local Ballot Measures | |
|---|---|
2025 »
« 2023
| |
 | |
| Arizona ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
| 2024 ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures in Arizona on November 5, 2024.
In 2024, Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures that appeared on the ballot for voters within the 100 largest cities in the U.S., within state capitals, and throughout California. You can review the coverage scope of the local ballot measures project here.
Ballotpedia covered electoral system-related ballot measures, like ranked-choice voting, and policing-related ballot measures outside of the largest cities.
- See also: Local ballot measure elections in 2024
Election dates
November 5
Maricopa County
- See also: Maricopa County, Arizona ballot measures
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Agua Fria Union High School District to issue $138,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Agua Fria Union High School District to issue $138,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Alhambra Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $235 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Alhambra Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $235 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to issue $18,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30.56 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to issue $18,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30.56 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $61 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Balsz Elementary School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $61 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Chandler Unified School District to issue $487,450,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40.65 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Chandler Unified School District to issue $487,450,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40.65 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Creighton Elementary School District to issue $85,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $68.94 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Creighton Elementary School District to issue $85,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $68.94 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to issue $325,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $67.73 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to issue $325,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $67.73 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $93 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Deer Valley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $93 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Dysart Unified School District to issue $127,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Dysart Unified School District to issue $127,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports permanently adjusting the city's expenditure limit by $1.5 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently adjusting the city's expenditure limit by $1.5 million. |
A "yes" vote supports excluding capital projects and land expenditures from the city's state-mandated expenditure limit. |
A "no" vote opposes excluding capital projects and land expenditures from the city's state-mandated expenditure limit. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $118 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $118 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
• Gilbert Unified School District, Arizona, Question 2, District Site Sale Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange the designated property to fund school projects. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Gilbert Unified School District to sell, lease, or exchange the designated property to fund school projects. |
A "yes" vote supported providing a minimum wage of $20.00 per hour for hotel and event center workers and adopting other labor regulations. |
A "no" vote opposed providing a minimum wage of $20.00 per hour for hotel and event center workers and adopting other labor regulations. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Glendale Union High School District to issue $195,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $47.46 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Glendale Union High School District to issue $195,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $47.46 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Higley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $140 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Higley Unified School District to override the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $140 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Higley Unified School District to issue $83,100,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $32.85 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Higley Unified School District to issue $83,100,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $32.85 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Isaac Elementary School District, Arizona, Question, District Site Sale Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Isaac Elementary School District to sell, lease, or exchange property to fund school necessities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Isaac Elementary School District to sell, lease, or exchange property to fund school necessities. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to issue $50,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $65.83 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to issue $50,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $65.83 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to override the General Maintenance and Operation Budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $229 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Laveen Elementary School District to override the General Maintenance and Operation Budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $229 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Laveen Elementary School District to override the district additional assistance budget by 10% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $203 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Laveen Elementary School District to override the district additional assistance budget by 10% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $203 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported continuing the transportation excise (sales) tax in Maricopa County for 20 years, with revenues allocated to freeways and highways (40.5%), public transportation (37%), arterial and streets and infrastructure (22.5%). |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the transportation excise (sales) tax in Maricopa County for 20 years. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 1, Permanent Adjustment to City Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports permanently increasing the city's base expenditure limit by $148 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently increasing the city's base expenditure limit by $148 million, thereby maintaining the existing expenditure limit established in 1979-1980. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 2, Public Safety Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports issuing $90 million in bonds to fund public safety facility improvements and construction, replace fire engines, expand the city's fiber network, and road improvements. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $90 million in bonds to fund public safety facility improvements and construction, replace fire engines, expand the city's fiber network, and road improvements. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 3, Recreational Facilities Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports issuing $170 million in bonds to fund construction of recreational facilities, install water conservation at city parks, construct a new aquatic center, renovate the historic Sirrine House, and renovate the i.d.e.a. Museum. |
A "no" vote supports issuing $170 million in bonds to fund construction of recreational facilities, install water conservation at city parks, construct a new aquatic center, renovate the historic Sirrine House, and renovate the i.d.e.a. Museum. |
• Mesa, Arizona, Question 4, General Plan Ratification Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports ratifying the city's general plan, which includes a vision statement, core values, guiding principles regarding resource management, public safety, and public services. |
A "no" vote opposes ratifying the city's general plan, which includes a vision statement, core values, guiding principles regarding resource management, public safety, and public services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Peoria Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27.27 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Peoria Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27.27 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 487, Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the mayor and city council by majority vote to establish the local expenditure limit. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the mayor and city council by majority vote to establish the local expenditure limit, thereby requiring the city to operate under the state-imposed expenditure limitation formula based on 1979-1980 expenditures adjusted for inflation. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 488, General Plan Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported adopting the General Plan providing direction on city development, conservation, and infrastructure investments. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting the General Plan providing direction on city development, conservation, and infrastructure investments. |
• Phoenix, Arizona, Proposition 489, Elected City Officials' Salaries Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports increasing the mayor's salary to $103,840 per year and the city council members' salaries to $77,000. |
A "no" vote opposes increasing the mayor's salary to $103,840 per year and the city council members' salaries to $77,000. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Queen Creek Unified School District to override the maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $143 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Queen Creek Unified School District to override the maintenance and operations budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $143 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Roosevelt Elementary School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $72.47 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Roosevelt Elementary School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school infrastructure improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $72.47 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to enact a sales tax at a rate of 0.15% for 30 years, beginning on July 1, 2025, to fund parks and recreational facilities, maintenance of the McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and increase police and fire resources related to parks. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to enact a sales tax at a rate of 0.15% for 30 years, beginning on July 1, 2025, when the existing 0.20% sales tax rate is set to expire. |
• Scottsdale, Arizona, Proposition 491, Increase Base Expenditure Limit Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supports permanently adjusting the city's base expenditure limit by $22 million. |
A "no" vote opposes permanently adjusting the city's base expenditure limit by $22 million. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the revenue control limit of the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $51 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the revenue control limit of the general maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $51 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the district additional assistance budget by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 to exceed the district additional assistance budget by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $98 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15% for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $98 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to exceed the district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $59 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Tolleson Elementary School District to exceed the district additional assistance budget limit by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for six years, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $59 per $100,000 to fund proposed increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to issue $10,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improving the school infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to issue $10,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improving the school infrastructure. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15%, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $75 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund any budget increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District to continue overriding the maintenance and operation budget by 15%, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $75 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund any budget increase. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to adopt a budget that exceeds an amount for capital purposes by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for 6 years, and requiring and estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund the proposed increase. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the Wilson Elementary School District No. 7 to adopt a budget that exceeds an amount for capital purposes by the lesser of 10% of the District's revenue control limit for 6 years, and require an estimated property tax levy of $33 per $100,000 in assessed value to fund proposed increase. |
Pima County
- See also: Pima County, Arizona ballot measures
• Amphitheater Unified School District, Arizona, Proposition 412, Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported allowing the school district to issue $84.00 million in general obligation bonds for school improvement projects. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the school district to issue $84.00 million in general obligation bonds for school improvement projects. |
A "yes" vote supported continuing existing budget overrides, allowing the Amphitheater Unified School District to maintain its general maintenance and operation budget at 13.5% above the state's revenue control limit for the 2025-2026 fiscal year and the following six years. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing existing budget overrides, allowing the Amphitheater Unified School District to maintain its general maintenance and operation budget at 13.5% above the state's revenue control limit for the 2025-2026 fiscal year and the following six years. |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Arizona
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Arizona.
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Section 565," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona generally observes Mountain Standard Time; however, the Navajo Nation observes daylight saving time. Because of this, Mountain Daylight Time is sometimes observed in Arizona.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Voters," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24A164," accessed August 22, 2024
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Supreme Court allows Arizona voter-registration law requiring proof of citizenship," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Bloomberg Law, "Supreme Court Partly Restores Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law ," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Reuters, "US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ ArizonaElections.gov, "What ID Do I Need to Vote Quiz," accessed March 14, 2023
- ↑ Arizona State Legislature, “Arizona Revised Statutes 16-579,” accessed July 19, 2024
| |||||||||||||
