Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Washington Initiative 208, Joint Property Tenancy with Right of Survivorship Measure (1960)
Washington Initiative 208 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Property |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated state statute |
Origin |
Washington Initiative 208 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in Washington on November 8, 1960. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported allowing two or more people to become co-owners of any kind of property as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing two or more people to become co-owners of any kind of property as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. |
Election results
Washington Initiative 208 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
647,529 | 60.05% | |||
No | 430,698 | 39.95% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Initiative 208 was as follows:
“ | AN ACT Relating to property; authorizing joint tenancies in real and personal property with common law incidents of survivorship and severability; allowing property rights of a deceased joint tenant to pass immediately upon death to the surviving joint tenant; prescribing methods and requirements for the creation of joint tenancies; providing that the transfer of property to surviving joint tenants shall not derogate from the rights of creditors; and repealing existing laws which abolished the right of survivorship as an incident of joint tenancies or tenancy by the entireties. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
In Washington, proponents needed to collect a number of signatures for an Initiative to the People.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Washington Olympia (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |