Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Wendy Lynn Potts

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Wendy Lynn Potts

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Michigan 6th Circuit Court
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education

Bachelor's

University of Michigan

Law

Wayne State University Law School


Wendy Lynn Potts is a judge of the 6th Circuit Court in Oakland County, Michigan. She was appointed to this position by Governor Engler on December 11, 1997 to replace former Judge Francis X. O'Brien. She was elected in November of 1998 and was re-elected in 2000, 2006 and 2012. Her current six-year term ends on January 1, 2019. She also served as the Chief Judge Pro Tempore of this court in 2002 and 2003 and as Chief Judge from 2004 to 2009.[1][2]

Education

Potts received her B.S. degree from the University of Michigan in 1965 and her J.D. degree from the Wayne State University Law School in 1977.[1]

Career

Potts began her career as a law clerk for Judge William Beasley of the Michigan Court of Appeals. She then joined the law firm of Morris, Rowland, Prekel, Paquette, Keidan & White in 1980. In 1983, she moved to the firm of Clark Hill P.L.C. She also served as a Magistrate for the 48th Judicial District Court from 1984 to 1995. In March of 1997, she became a judge of the Oakland County Probate Court, where she served until her appointment to the circuit court in December of that year.[1][2]

Awards and associations

  • Vice Chair, Michigan State Bar Foundation, 2009-present
  • Trustee, Michigan Supreme Court Historical Society, 2004 to 2009
  • Chair,Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, 2006 to 2009
  • Member. Michigan Supreme Court Committee on Model Civil Jury Instructions, 2002 to 2006
  • Member, ABA House of Delegates, 2000 to 2004
  • Chancellor, American Inn of Court, 2002 to 2004
  • Member, Board of Child Abuse and Neglect Council of Oakland County, 1997 to 2003
  • Commissioner, State Bar of Michigan, 1990-2000
  • Secretary, State Bar of Michigan, 1996-1997
  • Children's Justice Committee, State Bar of Michigan, 1995
  • President, Oakland County Bar Association, 1994-1995
  • Co-chair, Governor's Task Force on Domestic Violence, 1994[2]

2012 election

Potts was one of seven candidates competing for five seats in the general election on November 6, 2012. She was re-elected with 17.59% of the vote.[3] [4]

See also: Michigan judicial elections, 2012

Bar association ratings

Women Lawyers Association of Michigan

The WLAM rated candidates running for judicial office with one of four ratings: Outstanding, Well Qualified, Qualified or No Rating.

Potts was rated as Well Qualified.[5]

Wolverine Bar Association

Potts received a rating of Extremely Well Qualified from the Wolverine Bar Association.[6]

Endorsements

Incumbents decry interest group advertisement

In October, the five incumbents running for re-election to the 6th Circuit Court united to condemn an ad opposing Judge McMillen, which was run by the Virginia-based group Americans for Job Security. In a meeting, Judge Warren said,

We felt that it was very important that to maintain the integrity and independence of the judiciary that we unite together and stand against attempts to subvert our independence and integrity of the court, and try to politicize what should be a nonpartisan, non-political position.[7][8]

In a statement on his website, challenger William Rollstin says,

Just as challengers to incumbents express their displeasure with the status quo, so too can citizens affect the process...It’s ironic that a slate of candidates, unified by incumbency and not by ideological or philosophical bonds, would whine about following the law as determined by judicial precedent passed by the highest court in the land [Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission].[9][8]

See also

External links

Footnotes