Public policy made simple. Dive into our information hub today!

Virginia Linder

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 05:41, 9 November 2025 by MW-MassReplace (contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Virginia Linder
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Prior offices:
Oregon Supreme Court Position 6
Education
Bachelor's
Southern Oregon State College, 1975
Law
Williamette University College of Law, 1980


Virginia Linder was an associate justice of the Oregon Supreme Court. She was elected to her seat on November 7, 2006, and retained in 2012.[1][2] Linder retired on December 31, 2015.[3]

Education

Linder received her B.A. in political science from Southern Oregon State College in 1975 and her J.D. from Williamette University College of Law in 1980.[4]

Career

  • 2006-2015: Associate justice, Oregon Supreme Court
  • 1997-2006: Judge, Oregon Court of Appeals
  • 1986-1997: Solicitor general, Oregon Department of Justice
  • 1985-1986: Assistant solicitor general, Oregon Department of Justice
  • 1983-1985: Attorney-in-charge of the education section, Oregon Department of Justice
  • 1980-1983: Assistant attorney general, Appellate Division, Oregon Department of Justice[4]

Elections

2012

See also: Oregon judicial elections, 2012

Linder was re-elected after running unopposed to the Oregon Supreme Court, Position 6.[5][6]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Linder received a campaign finance score of -1.24, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -1.00 that justices received in Oregon.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes