Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

New Jersey Balanced Budget Amendment (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 16:09, 6 June 2016 by Maintenance script (contribs) (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Not on Ballot
Proposed ballot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure was not put
on an election ballot


Voting on state and local government budgets, spending, and finance
State finance.jpg
Policy
Budget policy
Ballot measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

A New Jersey Balanced Budget Amendment did not make the November 4, 2014 ballot in New Jersey as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment. At least three amendments to change the way a balanced state budget was kept were proposed in the 2014 legislative session. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 44, which was sponsored by Assemblyman Erik Peterson (R-23), would have required state revenue estimates for the purpose of a balanced state budget to be determined by the governor in accordance with the State Revenue Forecasting Integrity Commission.[1] Assembly Concurrent Resolution 45, which was also being sponsored by Assemblyman Peterson, would have prohibited the state from using bonds to balance the budget.[2] Assembly Concurrent Resolution 53, which was being sponsored by Assemblyman Bob Andrzejczak (D-1), and Senate Concurrent Resolution 89, which was being sponsored by Sen. Jeff Van Drew (D-1), would have both required the state budget to be balanced with regularly collected recurring revenue. They would have also stipulated that any surplus revenue and non-recurring revenue could only be used for debt service, capital improvements and pension and health benefits liabilities.[3][4]

Support

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the New Jersey Constitution

In New Jersey, proposed constitutional amendments have two ways of achieving ballot access. The New Jersey Legislature can either qualify it with supermajority approval of 60 percent in one legislative session or with simple majorities in two successive sessions.

ACR 44, 45 and 53 were introduced on January 16, 2014. ACR 44 and 45 were referred to the Appropriations Committee, and ACR 53 was referred to the Budget Committee.[5][6][7] SCR 89 was introduced March 17, 2014, and was referred to the Budget and Appropriations Committee.[8]

See also

External links

Footnotes

BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This state ballot measure article is a sprout; we plan on making it grow in the future. If you would like to help it grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia.