Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

AHRENFELDT v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN (1923)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 20:32, 22 April 2024 by Matt Latourelle (contribs) (historical scotus page set)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
AHRENFELDT v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN
Term: 1922
Important Dates
Argued: April 10, 1923
Decided: April 23, 1923
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsEdward Terry SanfordGeorge SutherlandWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter

AHRENFELDT v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 23, 1923. The case was argued before the court on April 10, 1923.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New Jersey U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
  • Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Alien Property Custodian
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 262 U.S. 60
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph McKenna

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes