Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN (2010)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 00:52, 23 April 2024 by Matt Latourelle (contribs) (historical scotus page set)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN
Term: 2009
Important Dates
Decided: June 29, 2010
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySonia SotomayorJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Samuel AlitoJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 29, 2010.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Georgia State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
  • Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Georgia
  • Citation: 561 U.S. 945
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes