Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

NELSON J. ELLIOTT v. SAMUEL SWARTWOUT (1836)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 15:19, 23 April 2024 by Matt Latourelle (contribs) (historical scotus page set)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
NELSON J. ELLIOTT v. SAMUEL SWARTWOUT
Term: 1836
Important Dates
Argued: January 21, 1836
Decided: February 1, 1836
Outcome
Certification to or from a lower court
Vote
5-0
Majority
Henry BaldwinJohn McLeanJoseph StorySmith ThompsonJames Moore Wayne

NELSON J. ELLIOTT v. SAMUEL SWARTWOUT is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 1, 1836. The case was argued before the court on January 21, 1836.

The U.S. Supreme Court examined the lower court's certified question. The case originated from the New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, governmental: tort or contract actions by or against government or governmental officials other than defense of criminal actions brought under a civil rights action.
  • Petitioner: Shipper, including importer and exporter
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Respondent state: United States
  • Citation: 35 U.S. 137
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Certification
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Smith Thompson

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes