Armina Gharpetian

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 19:40, 2 August 2024 by Kirsten Corrao (contribs) (Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This board member is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Armina Gharpetian
Image of Armina Gharpetian
Prior offices
Glendale Unified School District school board Trustee Area C

Contact

Armina Gharpetian was a member of the Glendale Unified School District school board Trustee in California, representing Area C. Gharpetian assumed office in 2013. Gharpetian left office in 2022.

Gharpetian ran for re-election to the Glendale Unified School District school board Trustee to represent Area C in California. Gharpetian won in the general election on April 4, 2017.

Gharpetian ran for re-election in 2022 and was defeated in the June 7 election by Kathleen Cross.

Elections

2017

See also: Glendale Unified School District elections (2017)

Three seats on the Glendale Unified School District Board of Education were up for by-district general election on April 4, 2017. In his bid for re-election in Trustee Area B, incumbent Greg Krikorian defeated challenger Vardan Stepanyan. In Trustee Area C, incumbent Armina Gharpetian ran unopposed and won another term on the board. The race for the open Trustee Area D seat featured candidates Joal Ryan and Shant Sahakian. Sahakian was elected to the seat.[1][2]

Results

Glendale Unified School District,
Trustee Area C General Election, 4-year term, 2017
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Armina Gharpetian Incumbent (unopposed) 100.00% 3,165
Total Votes 3,165
Source: Glendale City Clerk, "Glendale Municipal Election 2017," accessed May 1, 2017

Funding

See also: Campaign finance in the Glendale Unified School District elections

Gharpetian began the race with an existing account balance of $2,330.51 from her previous campaign. She reported $5,050.00 in contributions and $875.00 in expenditures to Glendale City Clerk, which left her campaign with $6,505.51 on hand in the election.[3]

Endorsements

Gharpetian was endorsed by the Glendale Teachers Union, the Armenian Council of America-Political Action Committee (ACA-PAC), and the Armenian National Committee of America, Glendale Chapter (ANCA-Glendale).[4][5][6]

2013

Glendale Unified School District,
At-Large General Election, 4-year term, 2013
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngGreg Krikorian Incumbent 22.8% 12,850
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngChristine L. Walters Incumbent 16.9% 9,504
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngArmina Gharpetian 16.3% 9,195
     Nonpartisan Jennifer Freemon 15.8% 8,892
     Nonpartisan Joylene K. Wagner Incumbent 14.9% 8,379
     Nonpartisan Daniel C. Cabrera 11.1% 6,243
     Nonpartisan Ali Sadri 2.3% 1,277
Total Votes 56,340
Source: City of Glendale, "General Municipal Election Results — 2013," accessed March 23, 2015

What was at stake?

2017

Election trends

See also: School boards in session: 2015 in brief
School Board Election Trends Banner.jpg

The Glendale Unified School District's 2017 election had the first unopposed board of education candidate in four election cycles. The district's 2011, 2013, and 2015 elections had a minimum of 2.33 candidates run per seat on the ballot, while the 2017 election attracted an average of 1.67 candidates per seat.

The 2017 election was guaranteed to add one newcomer to the board due to an open seat. There was the possibility a second newcomer would be added as one incumbent faced a challenger, but the incumbent was re-elected. Newcomers were added to the board in 2013 and 2015. The newcomer elected in 2013 defeated an incumbent to win the seat, but the newcomer elected in 2015 won an open seat. No newcomers were elected to the board in 2011.

School board election trends
Year Candidates per seat Unopposed seats Incumbents running for re-election Incumbent success rate Seats won by newcomers
Glendale Unified School District
2017 1.67 33.33% 66.67% 100.00% 33.33%
2015 2.50 0.00% 50.00% 100.00% 50.00%
2013 2.33 0.00% 100.00% 66.67% 33.33%
2011 4.00 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%
California
2015 2.01 22.95% 73.77% 81.11% 39.34%
United States
2015 1.72 35.95% 70.37% 82.66% 40.81%

Issues in the election

Candidate forum

All five candidates in this race participated in a candidate forum hosted by the League of Women Voters of Glendale/Burbank on March 2, 2017. A video of the forum can be found below.

Issues in the district

District discusses ways to reduce spending

The Glendale Unified School District could spend of all of its General Fund reserves by the 2019-2020 fiscal year, if a district trend of spending more money than it brought in each year continued, district officials announced at a school board meeting in January 2017.[7]

"Basically, the district will not be able to meet its financial obligations if this negative amount in [2019-2020] is not rectified," said Karineh Savarani, the district's director of financial services. With $34.8 million in its General Fund as of January 2017, the district could see a negative balance of $12.8 million in three fiscal years, according to Savarani.[7]

To address the negative trend, district officials looked at a number of ways to cut costs and increase revenue. Cheryl Plotkin, the district's interim chief business and financial officer, suggested trying to increase students' average daily attendance. Increasing attendance by half a percentage point could lead to $100,000 more in state revenue, according to the Los Angeles Times.[7]

Other ideas to save money included increasing the fee for outside groups to rent school facilities, lowering individual schools' budgets, moving summer school locations from multiple buildings into one, and sending fewer paper mailings to parents.[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes