Michael Kocmiersky
Michael Kocmiersky was a candidate for at-large representative on the Springfield Public Schools school board in Massachusetts. Kocmiersky was defeated in the at-large primary election on September 19, 2017.
Kocmiersky participated in Ballotpedia's 2017 school board candidate survey. Click here to read his responses.
Elections
2017
Six of the seven seats on the Springfield Public Schools School Committee in Massachusetts were up for general election on November 7, 2017. Incumbent Denise M. Hurst and newcomer LaTonia Naylor won election, defeating James Ferrera III and Ryan Hess for the at-large seats. Incumbent Barbara Gresham defeated Stephanie Murchison-Brown for the District 2 seat. Newcomer Maria Perez and incumbent Christopher Collins ran unopposed and won the District 1 and 3 seats, respectively. The District 4 race was won by incumbent Peter Murphy; he defeated challenger Zaida Govan.[1][2][3][4]
A primary election was held for the at-large and District 2 seats on September 19, 2017. Four candidates advanced to the general election from the at-large primary, and two candidates advanced from the District 2 primary.[1] James Anziano, LaMar Cook, Joesiah Gonzalez, and Michael Kocmiersky were defeated in the at-large primary, and Giselle Vizcarrondo was defeated in the District 2 primary.[3]
Results
Springfield Public Schools, At-large Primary Election, 4-year terms, 2017 |
||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
![]() |
27.15% | 2,538 |
![]() |
18.09% | 1,691 |
![]() |
16.81% | 1,571 |
![]() |
11.35% | 1,061 |
LaMar Cook | 8.28% | 774 |
Joesiah Gonzalez | 8.26% | 772 |
James Anziano | 5.58% | 522 |
Michael Kocmiersky | 4.23% | 395 |
Write-in votes | 0.26% | 24 |
Total Votes | 9,348 | |
Source: Springfield Election Office, "Returns: Sept. 19, 2017 Preliminary Election," September 19, 2017 |
Funding
Kocmiersky reported $1,141.25 in contributions and $871.25 in expenditures to the City of Springfield, which left his campaign with $270.00 on hand for the primary election.[5]
Campaign themes
2017
Ballotpedia survey responses
Michael Kocmiersky participated in Ballotpedia's 2017 survey of school board candidates.[6] In response to the question "What do you hope to achieve if elected to the school board?" the candidate stated on September 5, 2017:
“ | What I will do as a school committee member is reduce the amount of standardized testing to just a single standardized test, either the MCAS or the PARCC, and get rid of the district level testing and the ANet test. We spend too much time, money, and energy on an overwhelmingly abundant amount of testing, that the students don’t like, the parents don’t like, and the teachers don’t like. A good teacher will know what areas our kids need help with if we give them the time to work with our children rather than constantly preparing for the test. The more challenging issue will be to provide more enrichment opportunities for our students. Not just by bringing back shop classes, home economics, civics, foreign language, science, social studies, art, increasing the 15 minute recess time, gym, music, band, etc.; but also by bringing in people from the community to demonstrate a skill or a technology that will wow the students, opening their vision of what’s possible and make them interested and engaged. Engagement by the students, parents, and community is the only way that we will turn our schools into great learning facilities. By presenting more variety of opportunities we engage more students, by bringing in community we engage the community, and by demonstrating our activities with open houses, sports nights, science fairs, robotics displays, craft night, trade night, etc we engage parents. |
” |
Ranking the issues
The candidate was asked to rank the following issues based on how they should be prioritized by the school board, with 1 being the most important and 7 being the least important. Each ranking could only be used once.
Education policy |
---|
Click here to learn more about education policy in Massachusetts. |
Education on the ballot |
Issue importance ranking | |
---|---|
Candidate's ranking | Issue |
Expanding arts education | |
Balancing or maintaining the district's budget | |
Improving post-secondary readiness | |
Closing the achievement gap | |
Improving education for special needs students | |
Improving relations with teachers | |
Expanding school choice options |
“ | The relevance is not really to prioritize the importance of the above list, but in how you plan on accomplishing all of the above.[8] | ” |
—Michael Kocmiersky (September 5, 2017) |
Positions on the issues
The candidate was asked to answer eight questions from Ballotpedia regarding significant issues in education and the school district. The questions are highlighted in blue and followed by the candidate's responses. Some questions provided multiple choices, which are noted after those questions. The candidate was also provided space to elaborate on their answers to the multiple choice questions.
Should new charter schools be approved in your district? (Not all school boards are empowered to approve charter schools. In those cases, the candidate was directed to answer the question as if the school board were able to do so.) |
---|
No. In principle I have nothing against Charter Schools that want to try something different to achieve better results. However, the playing field is rigged in that the Charter Schools can run end around of the district rules and teacher contracts, and the state reimbursement mechanism short changes the district. The end result is that the charter school hires less experienced teachers for less money, generally don't offer good programs for special needs students to push these expensive students away, and parents soon realize that the educational offerings are no better than the non charter schools. |
Which statement best describes the ideal relationship between the state government and the school board? The state should always defer to school board decisions, defer to school board decisions in most cases, be involved in the district routinely or only intervene in severe cases of misconduct or mismanagement. |
The state should be involved in the district routinely. the state should monitor the district constantly in its pursuit to provide quality education for all the state's citizens. However, the state should defer to the school board decisions unless there is a proven problem with the school board. |
Are standardized tests an accurate metric of student achievement? |
No. It is an accurate measure of student achievement only in the areas that are tested. Our goal is to create grade A citizens, not just math or English specialists. |
How should the district handle underperforming teachers? Terminate their contract before any damage is done to students, offer additional training options, put them on a probationary period while they seek to improve or set up a mentorship program for the underperforming teacher with a more experienced teacher in the district? |
Terminate their contract before any damage is done to students. Offer additional training options. Offer additional training options. Put them on a probationary period while they seek to improve. Set up a mentorship program for the underperforming teacher with a more experienced teacher in the district. |
Should teachers receive merit pay? |
Yes. This is a complicated a issue, that requires negotiation with the teachers union, but in essence I believe those that are better teachers deserve better pay based on merit, just like I would strive for in any other profession. |
Should the state give money to private schools through a voucher system or scholarship program? |
No. By giving money to private schools, you will establish a pay to play education system. Those parents that can afford the unmet need of the tuition will send their children to the expensive school with more offerings, while those that can't afford the school will be left behind. |
How should expulsion be used in the district? |
Expulsion should only be used as a last resort. There will be some instances where expulsion is necessary, due to violence, or excessive repeated infractions that are harming the learning of all other students. |
What's the most important factor for success in the classroom: student-teacher ratio, the curriculum, teachers, parent involvement or school administration? |
Parent involvement. Parent involvement ensures that the belief that education is the pathway for opportunity is installed in the student, and keeps behavioral issues down and engagement up. |
Candidate website
Kocmiersky highlighted the following issues on his campaign website:
“ | MCAS Testing - At present we are conducting three standardized tests in our schools, the ANET, District Level testing, and MCAS or PARCC. There is too much time, energy, and money spent on an overabundance of standardized test. These tests are a major burden on our teachers, disrupting the autonomy of their lesson planning, and sucking up all of their time. The tests are demoralizing to our students, whereas some of them test on material that the student has not yet been taught. This demoralization manifests itself as disengagement which in turn shows up as behavioral issues. Environmental Leadership - Enrichment Opportunities - Engagement - Recess - Charter Schools - District Funding - Budget Transparency - Grants - |
” |
—Michael Kocmiersky (2017)[9] |
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Michael Kocmiersky Springfield Public Schools school board. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
- Springfield Public Schools, Massachusetts
- Springfield Public Schools, Massachusetts elections (2017)
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Mass Live, "Here's who qualified for the 2017 Springfield School Committee election," August 2, 2017
- ↑ Abbey Smith, “Email communication with Gladys Oyola, City of Springfield, Massachusetts," August 3, 2017
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Springfield Election Office, "Returns: Sept. 19, 2017 Preliminary Election," September 19, 2017
- ↑ City of Springfield, "Returns: Nov. 7, 2017 Municipal Election," accessed November 7, 2017
- ↑ City of Springfield, "Campaign Finance Reporting," accessed October 31, 2017
- ↑ Note: The candidate's answers have been reproduced here verbatim without edits or corrections by Ballotpedia.
- ↑ Ballotpedia School Board Candidate Survey, 2017, "Michael Kocmiersky's responses," September 5, 2017
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Mike Kocmiersky School Committee at Large, "Issue Statements," accessed September 11, 2017
Springfield Public Schools elections in 2017 | |
Hampden County, Massachusetts | |
Election date: | Primary election: September 19, 2017 • General election: November 7, 2017 |
Candidates: | At-large: • Incumbent, Denise M. Hurst • James Anziano • LaMar Cook • James Ferrera III • Joesiah Gonzalez • Ryan Hess • Michael Kocmiersky • LaTonia Naylor District 1: • Maria Perez District 2: • Incumbent, Barbara Gresham • Stephanie Murchison-Brown • Giselle Vizcarrondo District 3: • Incumbent, Christopher Collins District 4: • Incumbent, Peter Murphy • Zaida Govan |
Important information: | What's at stake? • Additional elections on the ballot • Key deadlines |