Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Arthur M. Diamond

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Arthur M. Diamond

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


New York Supreme Court 10th Judicial District
Tenure
Present officeholder
Term ends

2031

Education

Bachelor's

Rutgers University, 1974

Law

Hofstra University School of Law, 1978

Arthur M. Diamond is a justice of the Nassau County Supreme Court in the 10th Judicial District of New York. He was elected to this position in 2004.[1] Diamond was re-elected on November 7, 2017.

Biography

Diamond received his undergraduate degree from Rutgers University in 1974 and his J.D. from Hofstra University School of Law in 1978. Prior to being elected to the supreme court, Diamond served as a county court judge in 1999 and was reappointed in 2000. Diamond began his career in 1979 at the Nassau County District Attorney's Office, where he worked until 1986.[1]

Elections

2017

See also: New York local trial court judicial elections, 2017

New York held general elections for local judicial offices on November 7, 2017. A primary election was held on September 12, 2017. The filing deadline for candidates who wished to run in this election was July 13, 2017.[2]

The following candidates ran in the 10th District Supreme Court general election.[3]

10th District Supreme Court, General Election (4 open seats), 2017
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic/Republican Green check mark transparent.png Arthur M. Diamond Incumbent 20.60% 421,992
     Democratic/Republican Green check mark transparent.png Thomas Feinman Incumbent 20.57% 421,295
     Democratic/Republican/Independence Green check mark transparent.png Linda Kevins 15.37% 314,893
     Democratic/Republican/Independence/Working Families Green check mark transparent.png William B. Rebolini Incumbent 14.70% 300,991
     Republican Richard Hoffmann 10.89% 223,086
     Republican Robert Lifson 10.18% 208,593
     Conservative Daniel McLane 2.80% 57,246
     Conservative Thomas Rademaker 2.53% 51,804
     Independence Philip Boyle 1.33% 27,178
     Independence Stuart Besen 0.99% 20,286
Write-in votes 0.04% 761
Total Votes 2,048,125
Source: New York City Board of Elections, "Official Election Night Results," accessed December 18, 2017

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The 324 justices of the New York Supreme Court are elected to 14-year terms in partisan elections. To appear on the ballot, candidates must be chosen at partisan nominating conventions. Sitting judges wishing to serve an additional term must run for re-election.[4]

The chief judge of the court of appeals appoints two chief administrative judges of the supreme court, one to supervise trial courts within New York City and one to supervise trial courts outside of the city.[4]

Qualifications
To serve on this court, a judge must:[4]

  • be a state resident;
  • have had at least 10 years of in-state law practice;
  • be at least 18 years old; and
  • be under the age of 70 (retirement at 70 is mandatory).

Noteworthy cases

Nassau County employee unions v. Nassau Interim Finance Authority

Diamond ruled on three lawsuits filed against the Nassau Interim Finance Authority (NIFA). The unions alleged NIFA had no authority to freeze wages between 2011 and 2013. Although raises were negotiated by the unions as part of their contracts, employees did not receive raises during the three-year period.

The unions filed suits in federal court. They argued any authority NIFA had to freeze wages had expired. They also argued the wage freezes were unconstitutional. A federal judge found NIFA's authority to enact wage freezes had expired. However, the judge's decision was overturned on appeal in September 2013. The appeals panel indicated the case should be heard in state court because the case involved the interpretation of state law. According to Diamond's ruling, the Public Authorities Law did not impose any limitations on when NIFA could institute a wage freeze.

See also

Local courts New York Other local coverage
Trial-Courts-Ballotpedia.png
Seal of New York.png
Local Politics Image.jpg


External links

Footnotes