Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections

![]() | |
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections | |
Docket number: 24-568 | |
Term: 2025 | |
Court: United States Supreme Court | |
Important dates | |
Argued: October 8, 2025 | |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice John Roberts • Clarence Thomas • Samuel Alito • Sonia Sotomayor • Elena Kagan • Neil Gorsuch • Brett Kavanaugh • Amy Coney Barrett • Ketanji Brown Jackson |
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on October 8, 2025, during the court's October 2025-2026 term.
The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. To review the lower court's opinion, click here.
Background
Case summary
The following are the parties to this case:[2]
- Petitioner: Michael J. Bost, et al.
- Legal counsel: Paul D. Clement (Clement & Murphy, PLLC), T. Russell Nobile (Judicial Watch, Inc.)
- Respondent: Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.
- Legal counsel: Jane Elinor Notz (Office of the Attorney General, State of Illinois), Alex Hemmer (Office of the Illinois Attorney General)
The following summary of the case was published by Oyez
“ | Michael Bost, a multi-term U.S. Representative from Illinois’s 12th District, along with Laura Pollastrini and Susan Sweeney, political activists who served as presidential electors in 2020, challenged Illinois’s mail-in ballot receipt procedure. Under Illinois law, election officials can receive and count mail-in ballots for up to fourteen days after Election Day if the ballots are postmarked or certified by Election Day. Plaintiffs argued this procedure violates federal election statutes by impermissibly extending Election Day beyond the federally mandated date. They claimed the counting of these “untimely” ballots dilutes their votes and forces them to expend additional campaign resources to monitor ballot counting for two weeks after Election Day. Plaintiffs filed suit in May 2022 against the Illinois State Board of Elections and its Executive Director. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed the case, finding that Plaintiffs lacked Article III standing. The court also rejected their claims on the merits. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.[3] |
” |
To learn more about this case, see the following:
Timeline
The following timeline details key events in this case:
- October 8, 2025: The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument.
- June 2, 2025: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
- November 19, 2024: Michael J. Bost, et al. appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- August 21, 2024: The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois’s dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction.
Questions presented
The petitioner presented the following questions to the court:[1]
Questions presented:
|
Oral argument
Audio
Audio of oral argument:[4]
Transcript
Transcript of oral argument:[5]
Outcome
The case is pending adjudication before the U.S. Supreme Court.
October term 2025-2026
The Supreme Court began hearing cases for the term on October 6, 2025. The court's yearly term begins on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October the following year. The court generally releases the majority of its decisions by mid-June.[6]
See also
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- U.S. Supreme Court docket file - Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections (petitions, motions, briefs, opinions, and attorneys)
- SCOTUSblog case file for Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
- Oyez page for Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Supreme Court of the United States, "24-568 BOST V. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS QP", June 2, 2025
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24-568 Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections" accessed Septemer 17, 2025
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "Oral Argument - Audio," argued October 8, 2025
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "Oral Argument - Transcript," argued October 8, 2025
- ↑ SupremeCourt.gov, "The Supreme Court at Work: The Term and Caseload," accessed January 24, 2022