Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Brown County employee salaries, 2009-2010

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article may not adhere to Ballotpedia's current article guidelines. Please email us at editor@ballotpedia.org to suggest an improvement.



Brown County employee salaries are a matter of public record under the Wisconsin Open Records Law.

Salaries

Highest county salaries, 2009-2010[1]
Department general Name Department specific Title Base pay
Mental Health Ctr Bommakanti, Chandralekha Mental Health Ctr-Unit 7 Adult Mental H Extra Help $291,364
Human Services Patil, Veeranagouda A. Hum Svces-Community Treatment Program Psychiatrist $211,927
Human Services Rodriguez, Josefina C. Hum Svces-Community Treatment Program Psychiatrist $206,745
Mental Health Ctr Mannem, Koti Reddy Mental Health Ctr-Inpatient Admin Clinical Dir $192,386
Mental Health Ctr Bommakanti, Chandralekha Mental Health Ctr-Unit 7 Adult Mental H Extra Help $188,175
Human Services Patil, Veeranagouda A. Hum Svces-Community Treatment Program Psychiatrist $181,542
Human Services Rodriguez, Josefina C. Hum Svces-Community Treatment Program Psychiatrist $178,949
Mental Health Ctr Pareek, Yogesh C. Mental Health Ctr-Inpatient Admin Clinical Dir $143,889
Sheriff Van Vonderen, David J. Sheriff - Support & Courts Patrol Officer 6/3 $139,588
Library Stainbrook, Lynn M. Library-Business Svc Administration Library Dir $103,188

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia said the city of Philadelphia faced challenges owing to the cost of public employee pensions.[2] The report claimed the amount that Philadelphia paid to pension recipients limited the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report said there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[2] The authors recommended three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions: improved data collection, expanded transparency initiatives, and reductions to the city's overall budget.[2]

Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific compensation figures, and may leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

See also

External links


Footnotes