California Proposition 109, Extend Time Granted to Governor to Review Legislation Amendment (June 1990)
| California Proposition 109 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date June 5, 1990 | |
| Topic State executive official measures | |
Status Approved | |
| Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 109 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on June 5, 1990. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported extending the time that the governor is given to review bills passed by the state legislature after the legislature adjourns (in the first year of the legislative session) from 12 days to an additional 29 days, except for re-apportionment bills. |
A "no" vote supported maintaining the time the governor is given to review bills passed by the state legislature after the legislature adjourns (in the first year of the legislative session) at 12 days. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 109 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
|
|
2,627,505 | 55.39% | ||
| No | 2,116,438 | 44.61% | ||
-
- Results are officially certified.
- Source
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 109 was as follows:
| “ | Governor's Review of Legislation. Legislative deadlines. Legislative constitutional amendment. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | Extends Governor's time to review bills in Governor's possession after adjournment in first year of legislative session, except reapportionment measures, from 12 up to an additional 29 days. Statutes subject to referenda petitions filed prior to January 1 take effect January 1 or 91 days from enactment, whichever is later. Extends, to next working day, 12-day period for Governor to consider bills if 12th day falls on Saturday, Sunday or holiday. Changes legislative deadline for consideration of bills introduced in first year of legislative session to January 31 of second year. Summary of Legislative Analyst's estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact: No direct state or local fiscal impact. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal impact
The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said:[1]
| “ |
|
” |
Path to the ballot
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration. The California State Legislature voted to put Proposition 109 on the ballot with Assembly Constitutional Amendment 54 (Statutes of 1988, Resolution Chapter 74).
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ University of California, "Voter Guide," accessed July 1, 2021
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
