Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Carol Ronning Kapsner

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Prior offices:
North Dakota Supreme Court
Education
Bachelor's
College of St. Catherine
Law
University of Colorado School of Law, 1977
Graduate
Indiana University


Carol Ronning Kapsner was a justice of the North Dakota Supreme Court. She was first appointed to the court in 1998 by Republican Governor Ed Schafer. She was subsequently elected in 2000 to a full 10-year term on the court and re-elected in 2010. Although her term was set to expire on January 1, 2021, Kapsner retired on July 31, 2017.[1][2]

Education

Kapsner received her B.A. in English literature from the College of St. Catherine, her M.A. in English literature from Indiana University, and her J.D. from the University of Colorado School of Law in 1977.[1]

Career

Elections

2010

Kapsner was re-elected with 99.35 percent of the vote.[3]

Main article: North Dakota judicial elections, 2010

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Kapsner received a campaign finance score of 1.2, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 1.00 that justices received in North Dakota.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes

{{{after}}}