Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Daily Brew: May 17, 2019

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 17, 2019

Get your daily cup of news




%%subject%%

Today's Brew highlights new weekly features in our Daily Presidential News Briefing + a Texas judge rules on firefighter pay

 
The Daily Brew

Welcome to the Friday, May 17 Brew. Here’s what’s in store for you as you start your day:

  1. Biden leads all presidential candidates in Facebook ad spending
  2. Judge overturns 2018 ballot measure increasing Houston firefighters' pay
  3. What drugs are subject to a new federal rule requiring ads to explicitly state prices?

Biden leads all presidential candidates in Facebook ad spending

Since launching his presidential campaign last month, former Vice President Joe Biden (D) has spent roughly $1 million on Facebook advertising. Here’s a graphic that we published in yesterday’s presidential daily briefing.
 

Ballotpedia is tracking the top spenders on Facebook every Wednesday in our Daily Presidential News Briefing. We debuted other weekly features this week, which include:

  • Candidates by the Numbers (Mondays)
  • Trivia Tuesday
  • Poll Spotlight (Thursdays)
  • Campaign Staff Spotlight (Fridays)

You don’t want to miss these new features, especially since they come along with all the curated news about the presidential race. Our Daily Presidential News Briefing provides updates on candidate speeches and policy proposals, where the prominent candidates are campaigning, super PAC activity, campaign staff hiring, and more.

Go ahead, click the link below to subscribe.

Judge overturns 2018 ballot measure increasing Houston firefighters' pay

A Texas district court judge ruled that Houston’s Proposition B—a 2018 charter amendment granting city firefighters pay parity with police—is unconstitutional.

Houston voters approved Proposition B in the November 2018 general election, 59 to 41 percent. The Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association led a citizen initiative campaign to place the measure on the ballot and it was designed to match city firefighters’ compensation to that of the Houston Police Department.

After Proposition B was approved, the Houston Police Officers’ Union (HPOU) filed a lawsuit against the amendment. The suit argued that the measure was unconstitutional because it conflicted with rules concerning collective bargaining and also a state law that directs that firefighters be paid comparably to similar employees in the private sector.

The city determined that Proposition B would require 29% pay increases to firefighters initially and that its implementation would cost between $80 and $100 million per year. Last month the city council approved laying off 220 firefighters and 110 municipal employees since Houston can’t increase taxes due to its annual revenue cap. Mayor Sylvester Turner, who opposed Proposition B, had argued that the city did not have a funding mechanism for it.

Judge Tanya Garrison issued her ruling on May 15 in favor of the police officers’ union, stating that Proposition B is preempted by state code regarding fire and police employee relations and that it violates Article XI, Section 5 of the state constitution. That section states, “no charter or any ordinance passed under said charter shall contain any provision inconsistent with the Constitution of the State, or of the general laws enacted by the Legislature of this State.”

Following the ruling, the Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association released a statement stating, “Two courts have ruled on the constitutionality of Prop B – one for, one against. We certainly will appeal this ruling. We will continue to strive to force Sylvester Turner to respect the will of 298,000 Prop B voters who sent a strong message that Houston should equally value its police and fire personnel."

#FridayTrivia

What drugs are subject to a new federal rule requiring ads to explicitly state prices?

Earlier this week, I brought you a story about a new federal rule that will require drug advertisements to explicitly state prices. Starting July 9, pharmaceutical companies will be required to include the list price, also known as the wholesale acquisition cost, of certain prescription drugs covered by Medicare or Medicaid. The cost quoted will be for a 30-day supply or regular course of treatment.

Today’s quiz question is, what cost does a drug have to exceed before it is subject to this new requirement? Without looking at your old Daily Brews, is it…

  1. $5 →

  2. $30 →

  3. $35 →

  4. $50 →


See also