Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Dane County Sheriff's Office, Wisconsin, 2009

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article may not adhere to Ballotpedia's current article guidelines. Please email us at editor@ballotpedia.org to suggest an improvement.



Dane County Sheriff's Office employee salaries are public records under the Wisconsin Open Records Law.

Salaries

In 2009, 15 employees made over $100,000.[1]

Dane County Sheriff's Office salaries over $100,000, 2009[1]
Name Job title Agency Base pay Total earned
Lurquin, Robert Sergeant Sheriff-Field Services $69,248 $100,809
Hook, Jeffrey Captain - 105 Sheriff-Field Services $101,685 $101,685
Wagner, Joel Deputy Sheriff IV Sheriff-Field Services $53,785 $101,966
Hundt, Gerald Lieutenant Sheriff-Field Services $73,932 $102,883
Sampson, Joseph Lieutenant Sheriff-Admin $73,932 $104,097
Twombly, Mark Lieutenant Sheriff-Security Services $73,932 $104,811
Ritter, David Sergeant Sheriff-Field Services $69,248 $105,055
Blakley, Jeffrey Lieutenant Sheriff-Field Services $73,932 $105,663
Ritter, Timothy Captain - 105 Sheriff-Support Services $102,591 $106,458
Teuscher, Jeffrey Captain - 105 Sheriff-Security Services $102,591 $106,458
Disch, Gordon Sergeant Sheriff-Field Services $69,248 $107,100
Balistreri, Anthony Deputy Sheriff I-II Sheriff-Field Services $52,317 $108,458
Molony, Mary Captain - 105 Sheriff-Support Services $106,072 $110,218
Mahoney, David Sheriff Sheriff-Admin $113,979 $113,979
Boylan, Ron Chief Deputy Sheriff - 105 Sheriff-Admin $111,376 $115,794

Car use

According to information provided by the Sheriff's Office, personnel may use county-owned vehicles for official business only. County-owned vehicles may not be used for personal use without the knowledge or permission of the Sheriff, except in an emergency, when it is impractical to obtain prior authorization. In this event, the reason for using the vehicle and the circumstances shall be communicated to the employee's Division Commander with copies to the Sheriff and Chief Deputy as soon as practical.

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia said the city of Philadelphia faced challenges owing to the cost of public employee pensions.[2] The report claimed the amount that Philadelphia paid to pension recipients limited the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report said there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[2] The authors recommended three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions: improved data collection, expanded transparency initiatives, and reductions to the city's overall budget.[2]

Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific compensation figures, and may leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

External links

Footnotes