Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Have you seen these ballot measures?

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

October 10, 2014

By Brittany Clingen and Tyler King

BallotMeasureFinal badge.png

It's definitely confusing, and not immediately clear, how an approved state ballot measure could essentially disappear between the close of a state's legislative session and the upcoming general election on November 4. However, such has been the case this year in New Mexico, Virginia and Rhode Island. At least three ballot measures went missing, and several others have flown below the radar of most national news organizations and election resource websites.

Every election cycle features measures that receive little or no media attention, but it's rare for measures to go missing entirely. During the first week of August, Ballotpedia contacted all 50 of the country's secretary of state offices, in an effort to confirm the number of statewide ballot measures set to appear on the November ballots. Further research has turned up several discrepancies.

The full ballots were initially unclear in at least three states. Six measures in Rhode Island and one in Virginia went unnoticed by national election resource organizations until these states published information regarding the measures in their official voter's guides. In New Mexico, three bond measures were omitted from the New Mexico Legislature's online voter's guide. It was not until the measures were addressed in the secretary of state's official voter's guide, which was published several months after the legislative session concluded, that the complete contents of the ballot were made available.

When initially contacted by Ballotpedia on August 7, a spokesperson at the Rhode Island's Secretary of State office incorrectly confirmed there was just one measure - an automatically-referred question addressing a Constitutional Convention - set to appear on the November ballot. No mention was made of the six other measures - two legislatively referred constitutional amendments addressing gambling and four bond questions - even though these measures were approved for the ballot during a state legislative session which ended on June 23, nearly a month and a half prior.

Michael Narducci, deputy director of elections at Rhode Island's Secretary of State office, explained that after the legislative session ends, confirming which measures will appear on the ballot still takes several weeks. "The General Assembly finished its session on June 23,” said Narducci. “We waited a week to have the Governor sign the bills or veto the bills. We then have to have bond counsel and our office do a search to make sure we have all the questions that will appear on the ballot. Once that is complete Bond Counsel prepares the language, and it is then reviewed. This process usually takes two to four weeks. Once that is complete we send the language over to the agencies to sign off on. This takes about one to two weeks. Once all these processes take place we make the language and the ballot questions public. This is for the information coming out of this office."[1]

It's less clear how ballot measures got lost in the shuffle in Virginia. After an extensive, initial conversation with a representative at Virginia's Board of Elections office, Ballotpedia was informed there would be no measures appearing on the statewide ballot in 2014. On September 28, the Northern Virginia Media Services' Inside NOVA reported otherwise, noting that one legislatively referred constitutional amendment addressing taxes will appear on the statewide ballot in November.[2]

Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections Edgardo Cortés responded to follow-up questions after Ballotpedia received the misinformation, saying, "Any type of statewide ballot measure (constitutional amendment or referendum) must pass through the General Assembly to get onto the ballot. Information about all legislation is continually updated on Virginia’s Legislative Information System (LIS). This system is maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems (DLAS). Generally, they are your best source for guidance on how to track potential statewide ballot measures." He further added, "Our partnership with the Division of Legislative Services assures that we get the information needed in a timely fashion. The Department of Elections distributes information on statewide ballot measures in compliance with statutory requirements. We are unaware of an instance in which the Department has failed to meet those requirements."[3]

New Mexico's situation was, by far, the most complex and confusing. The 2014 legislative session concluded on February 20, 2014. In the spring, five legislatively referred constitutional amendments were identified on the secretary of state's website. By August, this number had inexplicably decreased to two. Then the state legislature put out a voter's guide including the original five amendments. However, at the end of September, the state office put out a guide with five legislatively referred constitutional amendments and three bond measures, not previously referenced. Multiple phone calls and emails directed at the New Mexico Secretary of State's office were not returned.

Paul Jacob, an activist and expert on the initiative and referendum process, told Ballotpedia, "I've not heard of anything like this happening before, but there is often too little information provided to voters about ballot measures. Secretaries of State and other officials don't need to 'educate' voters on the pros and cons of ballot measures, but citizens do need to know that an issue is going to be on their ballot to be decided, which, as Ballotpedia's work uncovered, is not always the case."

He also emphasized the importance of educating voters prior to elections, saying, "Election officials could also do much more to publicize ballot measures and thereby generate more media coverage alerting folks in advance about issues on which they may want to find out more information. It is as important to inform voters about ballot measures they will see in the voting booth as it is to inform voters where their polling place is. Getting people out to vote is better when they know in advance what will be on the ballot for them to decide."[4]

Footnotes

  1. Email interview with Michael Narducci, conducted by Ballotpedia State Ballot Measures Writer Ryan Byrne, October 6, 2014
  2. Inside NOVA, "Arlington GOP joins Democrats in support of constitutional amendment," September 28, 2014
  3. Email interview with Edgardo Cortés, conducted by Ballotpedia State Ballot Measures Writer Ryan Byrne, October 8, 2014
  4. Email interview with Paul Jacob, conducted by Ballot Measures Project Director Brittany Clingen, October 9, 2014