Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

Hawaii Threshold of Financial Damage Required to Establish the Right to a Trial by Jury, Amendment 1 (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hawaii Amendment 1
Flag of Hawaii.png
Election date
November 8, 2016
Topic
Civil and criminal trials
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

2016 measures
Seal of Hawaii.png
November 8
Amendment 1 Defeatedd
Amendment 2 Approveda
Polls
Voter guides
Campaign finance
Signature costs

The Hawaii Threshold of Financial Damage Required to Establish the Right to a Trial by Jury Amendment, also known as Amendment 1, was on the November 8, 2016, ballot in Hawaii as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment. The measure was defeated.

A vote "for" the measure was a vote to increase the threshold value in controversy requirement for jury trials in civil cases at common law to $10,000.
A vote "against" the measure was a vote to keep the threshold value at $5,000.

Amendment 1 would have continued the right to trial by jury in cases where the value in question exceeds $10,000.[1]

Constitutional amendments in Hawaii require approval from a majority of all voters casting a vote in the election, which means that filling out a ballot but not voting on Amendment 1 had the same effect as voting "no."

Election results

Amendment 1
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No185,58642.4%
Yes 201,198 46.0%
Election results from Hawaii Office of Elections
Note: The percentages above do not add up to 100 percent because of ballots that were cast on which Amendment 2 was left blank. The percentages displayed are the percentages of all ballots cast in the election because the "yes" votes must equal a majority of all votes cast.

Background

Amendment 1 represented the third time voters in Hawaii have voted on value requirements for civil trials. In 1978, voters approved an amendment that increased the value of controversy from $100 to $1,000. A decade later, an increase from $1,000 to $5,000 was also approved.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The proposed ballot title was as follows:[1]

Proposing an amendment to the Hawaii Constitution to change the threshold value in controversy requirement for jury trials in civil cases at common law from $5,000 to $10,000.[2]

Ballot question

The proposed ballot question was as follows:[1]

Shall the threshold value in controversy requirement for jury trials in civil cases at common law be increased from $5,000 to $10,000?[2]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article I, Hawaii Constitution

The proposed amendment would have amended Section 13 of Article I of the Hawaii Constitution. The following struck-through text would have been deleted and underlined text would have been added by the proposed measure's approval:[1]

Trial by Jury, Civil Cases

In suits at common law where the value in controversy shall exceed five ten thousand dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved. The legislature may provide for a verdict by not less than three-fourths of the members of the jury.[2]

Support

Senate Bill 143 was sponsored by Sen. Gilbert Keith-Agaran (D-5) and Sen. Maile Shimabukuro (D-21).[3]

Opposition

Opponents

  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company[4]

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Hawaii ballot measures
Total campaign contributions:
Support: $0.00
Opposition: $0.00

As of December 12, 2016, no ballot question committees registered to support or oppose Amendment 1.[5][6]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Hawaii Constitution

The Hawaii State Legislature can propose a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in two different ways. First, through a two-thirds vote in both the Hawaii State Senate and the Hawaii House of Representatives, held in one legislative session. Second, through a simple majority vote in both chambers, held in two successive sessions of the legislature. Senate Bill 143 passed through with more than a two-thirds majority during one legislative session.

On April 14, 2015, the Hawaii House of Representatives approved the amendment, with 47 representatives voting "yea" and four voting "nay." The Hawaii Senate unanimously passed the amendment on April 27, 2015. The measure was enrolled on the same day.[3]

House vote

April 14, 2015

Hawaii SB 143 House vote
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 47 92.16%
No47.84%

Senate vote

April 27, 2015

Hawaii SB 143 Senate Vote
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 22 100.00%
No00.00%

State profile

Demographic data for Hawaii
 HawaiiU.S.
Total population:1,425,157316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):6,4233,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:25.4%73.6%
Black/African American:2%12.6%
Asian:37.7%5.1%
Native American:0.2%0.8%
Pacific Islander:9.9%0.2%
Two or more:23.7%3%
Hispanic/Latino:9.9%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:91%86.7%
College graduation rate:30.8%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$69,515$53,889
Persons below poverty level:11.6%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Hawaii.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Presidential voting pattern

See also: Presidential voting trends in Hawaii

Hawaii voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.


More Hawaii coverage on Ballotpedia

Related measures

Civil and criminal trials measures on the ballot in 2016
StateMeasures
CaliforniaCalifornia Proposition 57, Parole for Non-Violent Criminals and Juvenile Court Trial Requirements Approveda
GeorgiaGeorgia Additional Penalties for Sex Crimes to Fund Services for Sexually Exploited Children, Amendment 2 Approveda

See also

External links

Footnotes