Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Jim Lewis (Texas judicial candidate)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Jim Lewis
Image of Jim Lewis

Education

Bachelor's

University of North Dakota

Law

University of Texas School of Law

Personal
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Jim Lewis was a 2016 candidate for the Texas 11th District Court in Texas.[1] Lewis lost to Rabeea Collier (D) and Kristen Hawkins (D) in the primary election on March 1, 2016.

Education

Lewis earned his B.A. from the University of North Dakota and his J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law.[2]

Career

Lewis began practicing as an attorney in 1988.[2]

Campaign themes

2016

Lewis' campaign website listed the following themes for his 2016 campaign:

Workplace sexual violence
At trial and on appeal, Jim Lewis has fought for the safety of workers on-the-job for decades. Here are just a few examples of his efforts.

In a case critical to the prevention of workplace violence, Jim wrote a brief, pro bono, on behalf of Aid to Victims of Domestic Abuse (AVDA) and the Texas Trial Lawyers Association (TTLA). Jim argued that victims of workplace sexual assault are entitled to sue their employers for money damages, and are not limited to proceedings before the Texas Commission on Human Rights, which requires exhaustion of administrative remedies. The issue is currently pending before the Texas Supreme Court in B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, No. 15-0404.

Employers' duties to protect worker safety

In one of its most significant decisions of its last term, the Texas Supreme Court recognized that employers owe their employees not only the duty to maintain a safe worksite, but also the duty to provide proper supervision, safety equipment, and training, especially with regard to how to eliminate or avoid dangerous conditions. Jim Lewis and Peter Kelly submitted a brief on behalf of TTLA, which was the only brief to make that argument. After the opinion came out, Jim, again working on behalf of TTLA and with Peter Kelly, submitted another brief calling into question the Supreme Court’s statement that employees, when confronted with workplace hazards, must either work through the danger or be fired–with no consequence to the employer. Austin v. Kroger Co., No. 14-0216.

Opponents’ access to political parties’ private documents

The Harris County Democratic Party (HCDP) contacted Jim Lewis to prepare a brief to the Texas Supreme Court in support of the limitation on the required publication of private documents kept by political parties, such as strategy for persuasion of voters, policies pertaining to the recruitment of candidates, and other confidential information. Though Jim represented the HCDP, he also enlisted cooperation from the Harris County Republican Party, and the Supreme Court refused to subject the parties to heightened disclosure standards. Greater Houston Partnership v. Paxton, No 13-0745.

Reimbursement of medical expenses to an injured man

Jim argued to the Texas Supreme Court, on behalf of TTLA, that a seriously injured individual is entitled to request reimbursement for the entire amount of the charges for his medical care. Though the man received his care at a charity hospital, the charity was not designed for the benefit of the individual who caused his injury, and the man was required to pay for medical care in the event he makes a recovery at trial. Jim opposed the defendant’s proposed transfer of wealth from charitable donors to culpable tort-feasors. Big Bird Tree Service v. Gallegos, No. 12-0508.

Homeowners’ rights to benefits under insurance policies

In a case involving hailstorm damage, but of critical importance to Texans living in hurricane-prone areas, Jim argued that homeowners should be able to obtain the benefit of coverage for serious damage caused by hurricanes and other storms without the necessity of a cost-prohibitive appraisal process. Though the Texas Supreme Court primarily sided with the insurance companies, The Court heeded Jim’s arguments on behalf of TTLA and held that going through appraisal is not a condition precedent to enforcing the terms of the insurance policy through the courts. In re Universal Underwriters, No. 10-0238. [3]

—Jim Lewis (2016), [4]

Elections

2016

[1]

Texas 11th District Court, Democratic Primary, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Kristen Hawkins 49.35% 81,172
Green check mark transparent.png Rabeea Collier 25.38% 41,751
Jim Lewis 25.27% 41,566
Total Votes 164,489
Source: Harris County, Texas, "Democratic Party Cumulative Report-Unofficial," accessed March 2, 2016

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The judges of the Texas District Courts are chosen in partisan elections. They serve four-year terms, after which they must run for re-election if they wish to continue serving.[5]

Though Texas is home to more than 400 district courts, the courts are grouped into nine administrative judicial regions. Each region is overseen by a presiding judge who is appointed by the governor to a four-year term. According to the state courts website, the presiding judge may be a "regular elected or retired district judge, a former judge with at least 12 years of service as a district judge, or a retired appellate judge with judicial experience on a district court."[6]

Qualifications
To serve on the district courts, a judge must be:

  • a U.S. citizen;
  • a resident of Texas;
  • licensed to practice law in the state;
  • between the ages of 25 and 75;*[7]
  • a practicing lawyer and/or state judge for at least four years; and
  • a resident of his or her respective judicial district for at least two years.[5]

*While no judge older than 74 may run for office, sitting judges who turn 75 are permitted to continue serving until their term expires.[5]

Endorsements

Lewis received the following endorsements in 2016:[8]

  • The Houston Chronicle
  • Former Houston Mayor Lee P. Brown
  • Mexican American Bar Association-Houston

See also

External links

Footnotes