Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Joseph N. Crosswhite

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Joseph N. Crosswhite

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


North Carolina 4th Superior Court Division Judicial District 22A
Tenure
Present officeholder
Prior offices
Sixth Division of the Superior Court North Carolina 22A Judicial District

Education

Bachelor's

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Law

University of South Carolina School of Law

Joseph N. Crosswhite is a judge for Judicial District 22A of the North Carolina 4th Superior Court Division.

Crosswhite ran for re-election for judge of the Sixth Division of the Superior Court North Carolina 22A Judicial District. He won in the general election on November 8, 2016.

Crosswhite was initially the senior resident superior court judge for the 22A Judicial District of the Sixth Division of the Superior Court in North Carolina.[1]

In 2018, the North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 717, revising the state superior court. Crosswhite's seat on the Sixth Division was absorbed into the Fourth Division.

The North Carolina Superior Courts are split into five divisions and 48 districts. Superior court judges rotate among the districts within their division every six months.[2] However, superior court judges are elected by voters in their district and must reside in the district in which they are elected.[3]

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Joseph Crosswhite served in the United States Army with the JAG Corps and reached the rank of colonel.[4] He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville and his J.D. from the University of South Carolina Law School.[5]

Elections

2016

See also: North Carolina local trial court judicial elections, 2016

North Carolina held general elections for local judicial offices on November 8, 2016. A primary election took place on March 15, 2016.[6] Incumbent Joseph N. Crosswhite ran unopposed in the Superior Court 6th Division District 22A general election.[7]

North Carolina Superior Court 6th Division, District 22A, General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Joseph N. Crosswhite Incumbent (unopposed) 100.00% 68,449
Total Votes 68,449
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Unofficial election results," accessed November 8, 2016

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The 98 judges of the North Carolina Superior Courts are chosen in partisan elections to serve eight-year terms. From 1998 through 2016, elections for superior court judges were nonpartisan; however, on March 23, 2017, the North Carolina legislature changed the method of election to partisan elections by overriding Gov. Roy Cooper's veto of HB 100. This change was effective with the 2018 superior court elections.[8][9][10][11][12]

The chief judge of each superior court is chosen by seniority.[13]

Qualifications
To serve on a superior court, a judge must be:

  • "learned in the law" and
  • under the age of 72 (retirement at 72 is mandatory).[13]

Noteworthy cases

Common Cause v. Lewis (2019)

See also: Redistricting in North Carolina

On September 3, 2019, a three-judge panel of North Carolina superior court judges – Paul C. Ridgeway, Joseph N. Crosswhite, and Alma L. Hinton – issued a unanimous ruling striking down the state's legislative district plan as an impermissible partisan gerrymander under the state constitution. In their ruling, the judges wrote, "[The] 2017 Enacted Maps, as drawn, do not permit voters to freely choose their representative, but rather representatives are choosing voters based upon sophisticated partisan sorting. It is not the free will of the people that is fairly ascertained through extreme partisan gerrymandering. Rather, it is the carefully crafted will of the map drawer that predominates."[14]

The court ordered state lawmakers to draft remedial maps by September 18, 2019, for use in the 2020 election cycle. The court indicated that it would appoint a referee to develop and recommend remedial maps to the court should the legislature fail to enact suitable remedial maps.[14]

See also

External links

Footnotes