Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Alma L. Hinton

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Alma L. Hinton

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division Judicial District 6A

Education

Bachelor's

North Carolina A&T State University, 1986

Law

North Carolina Central University School of Law, 1990


Alma L. Hinton (Democratic Party) was a judge for Judicial District 6A of the North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division.

Hinton was appointed to the court by Governor Mike Easley in August of 2004.[1][2]

Hinton (Democratic Party) ran for re-election for the Judicial District 6A judge of the North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division. She won in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Hinton retired from the court in 2021.[3]

The North Carolina Superior Courts are split into five divisions and 48 districts. Superior court judges rotate among the districts within their division every six months.[4] However, superior court judges are elected by voters in their district and must reside in the district in which they are elected.[5]

Education

Hinton received her B.A. in psychology from North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University in 1986 and her J.D. degree from the North Carolina Central University School of Law in 1990.[1]

Career

Hinton began her career in 1991 as an assistant district attorney. She was appointed to the District Court 6A as a district court judge in November of 2000. She was promoted to the Superior Court bench in August of 2004.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: Municipal elections in Durham County, North Carolina (2020)

General election

General election for North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division Judicial District 6A

Incumbent Alma L. Hinton won election in the general election for North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division Judicial District 6A on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Alma L. Hinton (D)
 
100.0
 
19,354

Total votes: 19,354
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Incumbent Alma L. Hinton advanced from the Democratic primary for North Carolina 1st Superior Court Division Judicial District 6A.

2012

Hinton was re-elected without opposition on Nov. 6, 2012.[2][6]

See also: North Carolina judicial elections, 2012

Judicial candidate survey

The North Carolina Bar Association asked its members to rank incumbent judges running for re-election on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "excellent." Below are Hinton's ratings in five categories and overall:

  • Overall: 4.32
  • Integrity & Impartiality: 4.41
  • Legal Ability: 4.14
  • Professionalism: 4.49
  • Communication: 4.42
  • Administrative Skills: 4.38[7]

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Alma L. Hinton did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

Common Cause v. Lewis (2019)

See also: Redistricting in North Carolina

On September 3, 2019, a three-judge panel of North Carolina superior court judges – Paul C. Ridgeway, Joseph N. Crosswhite, and Alma L. Hinton – issued a unanimous ruling striking down the state's legislative district plan as an impermissible partisan gerrymander under the state constitution. In their ruling, the judges wrote, "[The] 2017 Enacted Maps, as drawn, do not permit voters to freely choose their representative, but rather representatives are choosing voters based upon sophisticated partisan sorting. It is not the free will of the people that is fairly ascertained through extreme partisan gerrymandering. Rather, it is the carefully crafted will of the map drawer that predominates."[8]

The court ordered state lawmakers to draft remedial maps by September 18, 2019, for use in the 2020 election cycle. The court indicated that it would appoint a referee to develop and recommend remedial maps to the court should the legislature fail to enact suitable remedial maps.[8]

See also


External links

Footnotes