This Giving Tuesday, help ensure voters have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions. Donate now!

Judge confirms state's decision to allow tar sands mine without groundwater pollution permit

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Judicial Update

September 4, 2012

Utah: Judge Sandra K. Allen has confirmed the state's approval of a US Oil Sands Inc. tar sands mine without requiring a groundwater pollution permit.[1]

Judge Allen explained explained her decision saying, "Substantial evidence in the record supports a finding that shallow groundwater has not been located and may be assumed absent in the project area. US Oil Sands proposed operation does not present a greater than de minimis risk of affecting the quality of ground water."[2]

Opposition to the mine claimed there was insufficient evidence proving an absence of groundwater and that any groundwater, regardless of how much, should be protected.[3]

Judge Allen's decision will be forwarded to the Utah Water Quality Board which will either approve or reject the recommendation by the end of this month. If the decision is not appealed to the Utah Court of Appeals or rejected, the operation could become the nation’s first fuel-producing tar sands mine.[1]

Utah

Response to decision

In favor

Judge Allen's finding further substantiates the outstanding environmental attributes of US Oil Sands' extraction process which uses only a non-toxic bio-solvent derived from citrus to remove oil from the sands. We believe this process, which requires no tailings ponds, enables the PR Spring Project to possess one of the lowest environmental footprints in its class. This finding further advances our operational plan for the PR Spring Project and we continue to remain on-target for start-up in Q4, 2013.[2]

- Cameron Todd, CEO of US Oil Sands


I’m pleased with the findings. It acknowledges DWQ staff did a thorough review of the project and appropriately determined it would have negligible impact to the groundwater.[1]

- Walt Baker, Utah Division of Water Quality director[4]

Opposed

We are disappointed, obviously, but this is not the end of the road. It’s likely that we’re going to appeal this decision.[1]

- Rob Dubuc, an attorney representing Moab-based Living Rivers[4]

Footnotes