Michigan Proposal 6, Require Statewide and Local Voter Approval for State Spending on New International Bridges and Tunnels Initiative (2012)
Michigan Proposal 6 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Ballot measure process and Highways and bridges |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Michigan Proposal 6 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Michigan on November 6, 2012. It was defeated.
A “yes” vote supported this constitutional amendment to require approval from a majority of voters statewide and in each municipality where a new international bridge or tunnel would be located before the state of Michigan could spend funds or resources on the project. |
A “no” vote opposed this constitutional amendment to require approval from a majority of voters statewide and in each municipality where a new international bridge or tunnel would be located before the state of Michigan could spend funds or resources on the project. |
Election results
Michigan Proposal 6 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 1,853,127 | 40.70% | ||
2,699,558 | 59.30% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposal 6 was as follows:
“ | PROPOSAL 12-6 A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS This proposal would:
Should this proposal be approved? YES NO | ” |
Support
The Detroit International Bridge Co. released a number of ads either supporting the amendment or targeting the New International Trade Crossing. However, the group Michigan Truth Squad, part of the bipartisan Center for Michigan, rated all the ads "Flagrant Foul," questioning the truthfulness of their contents.[1]
Arguments
- Founder of Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, voiced his support for the measure arguing that the government should not get "into the business of building bridges." Norquist says federal funds will be used to construct a U.S. customs plaza for the bridge, something he says, "is not free."[2]
Campaign contributions
In Michigan campaign finance information related to ballot measures is organized by ballot question committees. The following data was obtained from the state Campaign Finance Committee:
Committee info:
Committee | Amount raised | Amount spent |
---|---|---|
The People Should Decide | $4,657,500.00 | $4,588,552.97[3] |
Total | $4,657,500.00 | $4,588,552.97 |
Opposition
As a supporter of the new bridge which would compete with Detroit International Bridge Co., Governor Rick Snyder opposes this amendment which would seriously hamper plans on the new bridge if passed.[1]
Opponents
- Gov. Rick Snyder
- State Rep. Rashida Tlaib[1]
- Michigan Chamber of Commerce[4]
- Taxpayers Against Monopolies
Arguments
- In a press release published in September 2012, Gov. Snyder said, "While the proposal is intended to protect one company's monopoly on truck crossings between Detroit and Canada, it was sloppily written and jeopardizes ANY bridge under construction today that won't be completed by January 1, 2012, or any bridge built thereafter."[5]
Polls
- See also: Polls, 2012 ballot measures
- An EPIC-MRA poll conducted on September 8-11, 2012, found that 47 percent were in support of the measure, while 44 percent were opposed, and another 9% were undecided. The poll was based on a poll of 600 likely voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent.[6]
|
Date of Poll | Pollster | In favor | Opposed | Undecided | Number polled |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 8-11, 2012 | EPIC-MRA | 47% | 44% | 9% | 600 |
Path to the ballot
An initiated constitutional amendment is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends a state's constitution. Eighteen (18) states allow citizens to initiate constitutional amendments.
In Michigan, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 10% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.
Following a stalemate vote in the Board of State Canvassers, the measure was taken to the Michigan Supreme Court where it was certified for the ballot.[7]
See also
External links
- Michigan Bureau of Elections, "Initiatives and Referendums Under the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963," January 2019
- Senate Fiscal Agency, "November 2012 Ballot Proposal 12-6 An Overview"
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedmethods
- ↑ MLive.com, "Anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist endorses bridge ballot measure," October 4, 2012
- ↑ Pre-general campaign statement, accessed July 26, 2012
- ↑ Detroit Free Press, "Poll: Michigan voters skeptical about collective bargaining, bridge ballot proposals," September 16, 2012
- ↑ Press release from Gov. Rick Snyder, September 2012
- ↑ Detroit Free Press, "Poll: Michigan voters skeptical about collective bargaining, bridge ballot proposals," September 16, 2012
- ↑ Detroit Free Press, "Bridge, union rights, tax measure make Nov. ballot but casino effort blocked," September 6, 2012
![]() |
State of Michigan Lansing (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |