Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Montana Personhood Definition Amendment (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Not on Ballot
Proposed ballot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure was not put
on an election ballot


Voting on Abortion
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

The Montana Personhood Definition Amendment did not make the November 8, 2016 ballot in Montana as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment.

The measure would have defined a "person" as "all members of the species Homo sapiens at any stage of development, including the stage of fertilization or conception, regardless of age, health, level of functioning, or condition of dependency."[1]

Supporters, like Annie Bukacek, president of the Montana Prolife Coalition, said the amendment's intent was to prevent abortions.[2]

Rep. Matthew Monforton (R-69) sponsored the amendment, entitled House Bill 425, in the Montana Legislature.[1]

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Article II, Montana Constitution

The proposed amendment would have amended Section 17 of Article II of the Montana Constitution. The following underlined text would have been added by the measure's approval:[3]

Section 17. Due process of law.

(1) No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

(2) As used in this section, the word "person" applies to all members of the species Homo sapiens at any stage of development, including the stage of fertilization or conception, regardless of age, health, level of functioning, or condition of dependency.

(3) The legislature shall implement this section by appropriate legislation.[4]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Montana Constitution

A two-thirds vote the entire Montana Legislature was required for the amendment to be placed on the ballot.

On February 17, 2015, the amendment was narrowly approved by the Montana House Judiciary Committee. All nine Democrats on the committee plus Rep. Kirk Wagoner (R-75) voted against moving the bill forward. The other 11 Republicans voted in favor of the amendment. However, the bill was not taken up again and died in standing committee on April 28, 2015.[5][6]

Related measures

See also

External links

Footnotes