News and analysis right to your inbox. Click to get Ballotpedia’s newsletters!

Nixon v. Madison County Agricultural Society

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This Ballotpedia article needs to be updated.
This Ballotpedia article is currently under review by Ballotpedia staff as it may contain out-of-date information. Please email us if you would like to suggest an update.



Litigation.png

This Open Records and Transparency Project article is a sprout. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by expanding this article.

Nixonvs.Madison County Agricultural Society
Number: 348 NW 2d 119
Year: 1984
State: Nebraska
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Other lawsuits in Nebraska
Other lawsuits in 1984
Precedents include:
This case established that private entities which receive public funds through levying taxes are considered public bodies under the Nebraska Open Meetings Act.[1]
Sunshine Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Deliberative Process Exemption


Nixon v. Madison County Agricultural Society was a case before the Nebraska Supreme Court in 1984 concerning the application of transparency laws to nonprofit corporations.

Important precedents

This case established that private entities which receive public funds through levying taxes are considered public bodies under the Nebraska Open Meetings Act.[2]

Background

  • The Madison County Agricultural Society, a private nonprofit, voted to enact a contract for the construction of live-stock expedition building for $140,000.
  • Burton Nixon filed a suit seeking to void the action, arguing that the directors of the society made the decision in a closed meeting, in violation of the Nebraska Open Meetings Act
  • The trial court ruled in favor of Nixon and ordered the contract void. The decision was appealed.[2]

Ruling of the court

The trial court ruled in favor of Nixon, determining that because the Society levies taxes and expends public moneys.

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the trial court and determined that because the Society reserves the right to receive public funding through taxation, it is considered a public body subject to the open meetings law.[2]

Associated cases

See also

  • Nebraska Open Meetings Act

External links

Footnotes