Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
Oregon Measure Nos. 326-327, Appropriation of 10% from Self-Sustaining Board Revenues Referendum (1926)
Oregon Measure Nos. 326-327 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Taxes |
|
Status |
|
Type Veto referendum |
Origin |
Oregon Measure Nos. 326-327 was on the ballot as a veto referendum in Oregon on November 2, 1926. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported appropriating 10% of state board and commission revenues from fees, licenses, and taxes to the state general fund. |
A "no" vote opposed appropriating 10% of state board and commission revenues from fees, licenses, and taxes to the state general fund. |
Election results
Oregon Measure Nos. 326-327 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 46,389 | 32.25% | ||
97,460 | 67.75% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure Nos. 326-327 was as follows:
“ | Referred Bill - Referendum Ordered by Petition of the People Referred by Tom E. Shea, 433 Morris street, Portland, Oregon - ACT APPROPRIATING TEN PER CENT OF SELF-SUSTAINING BOARDS' RECEIPTS - Purpose: To transfer to the state general fund for the payment of general expenses of the state, 10 per centum of the receipts of the state boards and commissions therein named, constituting practically all of those supported by and collecting fees, licenses and taxes, and to deduct the same from the revenues available for such boards and commissions. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
The number of signatures required for a veto referendum was equal to 5% of the total votes cast in the last Supreme Court justice election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Oregon Salem (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |