Sarasota, Florida, Question 2, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (November 2007)
Sarasota Question 2 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Local charter amendments and Local elections and campaigns |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiative |
|
Sarasota Question 2 was on the ballot as an initiative in Sarasota on November 6, 2007. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported establishing ranked-choice voting for Sarasota city elections. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing ranked-choice voting for Sarasota city elections. |
Aftermath
The state of Florida banned local ranked-choice voting in 2022. Municipalities in Florida had authorized, but not used, ranked-choice voting when the state banned the system.[1]
Election results
Sarasota Question 2 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
6,554 | 77.61% | |||
No | 1,891 | 22.39% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Question 2 was as follows:
“ | Amendment to require the use of the Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) method for all district and at large City Commission elections. IRV enables voters to rank all of the candidates for an office in order of preference on a single ballot: first, second, third, etc. Votes are then counted in rounds until one candidate (or two candidates in an at large election) emerges with a majority of votes cast. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Support
Supporters
Organizations
Arguments
The official arguments included in the voter's pamphlet were as follows:
Opposition
Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign or arguments against the measure.
Background
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures | |
---|---|
Pages: • Ranked-choice voting (RCV) • History of RCV ballot measures • Electoral systems on the ballot • Local electoral systems on the ballot • Electoral systems by state |
- See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.
Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.
RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.
Local RCV ballot measures
Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.
- Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
- There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
- The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
- The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.
The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.
Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025 | |||||
Topic | Total | Approved | Approved (%) | Defeated | Defeated (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adopt RCV | 72 | 57 | 79.2% | 15 | 20.08% |
Repeal RCV | 8 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 50.0% |
Total | 80 | 61 | 76.3% | 19 | 23.7% |
Path to the ballot
The charter amendment was placed on the ballot by citizen initiative petition.[2]
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Florida Tallahassee (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |