Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

St. Louis, Missouri, Proposition R, Redistricting Commission, Public Vote to Change Voting Methods, and Conflicts of Interest Requirements Initiative (April 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
St. Louis Proposition R
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
Election date
April 5, 2022
Topic
Local elections and campaigns
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Initiative
Origin
Citizens

St. Louis Proposition R was on the ballot as an initiative in St. Louis on April 5, 2022. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this charter amendment to:

 create a redistricting commission for drawing ward boundaries;

 require a public vote before a proposed change to voting methods can be adopted; and

 require alderpersons to declare personal or financial conflicts of interest and abstain from voting when there are conflicts of interest.

A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment, thus continuing to provide that the Board of Alderman is responsible for redistricting and to allow voting methods to be changed by a board-passed ordinance.


A three-fifths (60%) majority vote was required for the approval of Proposition R.

Election results

St. Louis Proposition R

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

13,321 69.14%
No 5,946 30.86%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

How did Proposition R change redistricting in St. Louis?

Going into this election, the St. Louis Board of Alderman was responsible for drafting and approving the city's wards. Proposition R transferred that power from the board to a 9-member redistricting commission that, according to the amendment, should "represent the demographic make-up of the City of St. Louis."[1]

The initiative was designed to have an Oversight Committee remove applicants for the commission that do not meet certain requirements, and then provide a list of applicants to the Board of Aldermen. The initiative allowed each alderperson to strike one applicant from the list, which will then return to the Oversight Committee under the initiative. A random draw will then be used to select four applicants to serve as commissioners, and those four persons would select the remaining five applicants by three-fourths votes.[1]

The 9-member redistricting commission was tasked by the initiative to establish ward boundaries based on the following criteria, in order of priority:[1]

  • following requirements of the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act of 1965;
  • creating districts with contiguous territory;
  • minimizing the division of local neighborhoods or local communities of interest;
  • creating districts that are compact in form; and
  • using geographically identifiable boundaries.

Proposition R required approval by five commissioners for any official actions, including approval of a final map.[1]

How did Proposition R relate to the city's electoral systems?

Proposition R requires the Board of Aldermen to submit any proposed changes to voting methods to the ballot for a public vote. According to Proposition R, the purpose of this requirement was to "protect voters' rights and prevent the Board of Alderpersons from overturning the will of the people pertaining to voter-enacted reforms."[1] An example of a voter-enacted change to the city's electoral system is Proposition D, which was approved in November 2020 and enacted a system of approval voting. Under Proposition R, Proposition D cannot be changed by the board without voter approval.

What other changes did Proposition R make to the St. Louis Charter?

Proposition R renamed the Board of Aldermen to the Board of Alderpersons.[1] The charter amendment also enacted several provisions related to conflicts of interest, including:[1]

  • prohibiting alderpersons from knowingly using their official position to influence others for their own or a related person’s personal or financial benefit;
  • requiring alderpersons to declare personal or financial conflicts of interest and abstain from voting when there are conflicts of interest;
  • prohibiting alderpersons from accepting employment or contracts that interfere with the discharge of their public duties or create conflicts of interest; and
  • requiring former alderpersons to wait at least one year before serving as a lobbyist to influence a city government decision.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition R was as follows:[1]

Proposition R. Proposed by Initiative Petition.

Shall Article IV of the City of St. Louis Charter be amended to:

  • Prohibit Alderpersons from taking actions on policies where they have a personal or financial conflict of interest;
  • Require that Alderpersons’ financial disclosure statements be open to the public;
  • Have ward boundary maps drawn by an independent citizens commission, which shall have a diverse group of members, hold public hearings, and draw maps that keep neighborhoods and communities together;
  • Prohibit lobbyists, Alderpersons, and others with conflicts of interest from serving on the independent citizens commission; and
  • Protect the rights of voters by prohibiting the Board of Alderpersons from overturning the will of the people on voting methods for municipal offices without a public vote?[2]

Full text

The full text of the ballot initiative is below:[1]

Support

St. Louis Yes on R April 2022.png

Reform St. Louis led the campaign in support of Proposition R.[3]

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Action St. Louis Power Project
  • Center for Election Science
  • Election Reformers Network
  • Forward Through Ferguson
  • Jewish Community Relations Council of St. Louis
  • League of Women Voters of Metro St. Louis
  • Missouri Faith Voices
  • Represent.Us
  • Serve America Movement
  • Show Me Integrity
  • St. Louis Association of Community Organizations
  • St. Louis Young Democrats

Individuals

  • Yinka Faleti (D) - Candidate for Missouri Secretary of State in 2020


Arguments

  • Jami Cox, Policy Committee Chair of Reform St. Louis: "What’s at stake is making sure that the St Louis city government is operating in the most efficient and ethical way possible. If this proposition doesn't pass, then we are looking at the redistricting process still being led by the people that are ultimately going to be running for the seats that they serve in and not having any hard outline processes in our city charter to reduce conflicts of interest."
  • Benjamin Singer, Executive Director of Show Me Integrity: "Independent commissions — not bipartisan commissions but independent — commissions are the gold standard for ensuring a transparent, citizen-driven redistricting process."


Opposition

Vote No Prop R led the campaign in opposition to Proposition R.[4]

Opponents

Officials

Political Parties

  • City of St. Louis Republican Party
  • St. Louis City Democratic Central Committee


Arguments

  • Board of Aldermen President Lewis Reed: "There is no need to have a special election costing the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars solely for a proposal that the Prop R group admits is untimely, would be challenged in court, would not put into effect what it states it will and would not take effect for 10 years."


Media editorials

Support

Ballotpedia did not locate media editorial boards in support of the ballot measure.

Opposition

  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial Board: "Proponents of Prop R have the right idea. But this measure contains too many gaps to justify replacing the current system with a new system that could be equally flawed. ... Worst of all, this new group of map makers would be accountable to no one. Elected officials, at least, are accountable to voters and always risk being voted out of office if their actions are perceived to be self-serving or corrupt. There appears to be no way to hold any members of this proposed commission accountable, nor is it clear that the installation of such a commission would be free of the very political self-interests that Prop R is designed to uproot."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Missouri ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through April 30, 2022.


Show Me Integrity Action Fund was registered as a political action committee (PAC) to support the ballot initiative. The PAC raised $135,369.[5]

Vote NO Prop R was registered as a PAC to oppose the ballot initiative. The PAC raised $2,635.[5]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $131,169.30 $4,200.00 $135,369.30 $136,698.95 $140,898.95
Oppose $2,566.16 $427.96 $2,994.12 $2,566.16 $2,994.12
Total $133,735.46 $4,627.96 $138,363.42 $139,265.11 $143,893.07

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the initiative.[5]

Committees in support of Proposition R
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Show Me Integrity Action Fund $131,169.30 $4,200.00 $135,369.30 $136,698.95 $140,898.95
Total $131,169.30 $4,200.00 $135,369.30 $136,698.95 $140,898.95

Donors

The following were the top donors to the committee.[5]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Center for Election Science $62,320.00 $0.00 $62,320.00
Show Me Integrity $15,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
Anne Sappingron $4,400.00 $0.00 $4,400.00
YVM Holdings, LLC $0.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00
Action St. Louis Power Project $3,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00

Oppose

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the initiative.[5]

Committees in opposition to Proposition R
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Vote NO Prop R $2,566.16 $427.96 $2,994.12 $2,566.16 $2,994.12
Total $2,566.16 $427.96 $2,994.12 $2,566.16 $2,994.12

Donors

The following were the top donors to the committee.[5]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
City of St. Louis Republican Party $1,100.00 $1,352.50 $2,452.50

Background

St. Louis Proposition D (2020)

See also: St. Louis, Missouri, Proposition D, Approval Voting Initiative (November 2020)

At the election on November 3, 2020, voters approved St. Louis Proposition D, which adopted a system of approval voting for the offices of mayor, comptroller, president of the Board of Aldermen, and the Board of Aldermen. Proposition D also made elections for these offices open and nonpartisan. Approval voting is an electoral system in which voters may vote for any number of candidates they choose. In St. Louis, the top two candidates with the most votes compete in a runoff general election.

Redistricting in St. Louis

In St. Louis, Missouri, members of the Board of Aldermen are elected from wards. In 2012, voters passed a charter amendment reducing the number of wards and alderpersons from 28 to 14 on January 1, 2022.[6]

In St. Louis as of the beginning of 2022, the Board of Aldermen was responsible for approving the decennial redistricting maps. The 14-ward district map was approved on December 14, 2021, by the Board of Aldermen.[6]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Missouri

In St. Louis, Missouri, a campaign for a citizen-initiated measure must collect a number of signatures equal to at least 10% of registered voters at the last mayoral election.

On September 20, 2021, the campaign Reform St. Louis reported submitting about 39,000 signatures.[7] On October 4, 2021, Board of Elections Director Benjamin Borgmeyer announced that the campaign had collected more valid signatures than the minimum requirement, which was 20,141.[8]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Missouri

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Missouri.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Reform St. Louis, "Petition for Proposition R," accessed February 19, 2022
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  3. Reform St. Louis, "Homepage," accessed February 19, 2022
  4. Vote No Prop R, "Homepage," accessed April 2, 2022
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Missouri Ethics Commission, "Campaign Finance," accessed February 19, 2022
  6. 6.0 6.1 St. Louis, Missouri, "City of St. Louis Redistricting," accessed March 4, 2022
  7. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Petitioners submit signatures seeking St. Louis ward redistricting change," September 20, 2021
  8. The St. Louis American, "St. Louisans to cast vote on Prop R in April special election," October 4, 2021
  9. Missouri Secretary of State - Elections and Voting, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed April 4, 2023
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Missouri Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed April 4, 2023
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 27, 2024
  12. BillTrack50, "MO HB1878," accessed April 4, 2023
  13. Missouri Secretary of State, "FAQs Voter Registration," accessed August 27, 2024
  14. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  15. Missouri Secretary of State, "How To Vote," accessed October 7, 2025
  16. Missouri Secretary of State, "Do I need an ID to vote?" accessed October 7, 2025