Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
The Federal Judicial Vacancy Count 12/1/2023
December 1, 2023
Welcome to the Federal Vacancy Count for December 1, 2023! The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts.
This month's edition covers activity from November 2, 2023, through December 1, 2023, and compares Article III judicial appointments over time by president and by court type.[1][2]
What's a vacancy?
A vacancy occurs when a judge resigns, retires, takes senior status, or dies. Article III judges refer to judges who serve on courts authorized by Article III of the Constitution, which created and enumerated the powers of the judiciary. Article III judges are appointed for life terms. Unless a judge is impeached and removed from office—something that has occurred eight times in the history of the federal judiciary—it is the judge's decision how long they remain on the court. When judges decide to leave active duty, they may either retire completely from the court or take senior status.
To take senior status, judges must meet certain age and service requirements. Senior status is a classification for federal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges continue to serve on federal courts while hearing a reduced number of cases. Both a decision to retire and a decision to take senior status trigger a vacancy.
The Constitution prescribes the process of filling a vacancy. The president nominates a candidate, who then must be confirmed by the United States Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:
- The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee.
- After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee votes to approve or return the nominee.
- If approved, the Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
For more information on this process, click here.
Vacancy count for December 1, 2023
The vacancy level was in November 2023. The total vacancy percentage was 7.2 percent, and there were 63 vacancies out of 870 Article III judicial positions.
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies on the federal courts, click here.
Key: | |
(Numbers indicate % of seats vacant.) | |
0% | 1%-9% |
10%-24% | 25%-40% |
More than 40% |
Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
New vacancies
Three judges left active status. As Article III judicial positions, vacancies must be filled by a nomination from the president. Nominations are subject to confirmation on the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
- Judge Edward G. Smith left the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania when he died on November 27, 2023
- Judge Ana de Alba resigned from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California when she was elevated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
- Judge George Wu assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. Court of Appeals vacancies
Chart
The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) to January 1, 2023.
Maps
The following maps show the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals at the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) and as of December 1, 2023.
U.S. District Court vacancies
The following map shows the number of vacancies in the United States District Courts as of January 1, 2023.
New nominations
President Joe Biden (D) announced five new nominations since the previous report. On November 15, 2023, the president announced his intent to nominate the following individuals:
- Nicole Berner to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit
- Adeel Mangi to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
- Amy Baggio to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
- Cristal Brisco to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
- Gretchen Hess Lund to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Since taking office in January 2021, Biden has nominated 195 individuals to Article III positions.
New confirmations
There have been eleven new confirmations since the previous report:
- Kenly Kiya Kato to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Julia Kobick to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- Ramon Reyes, Jr. to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- Mónica Ramírez Almadani to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Brandy McMillion to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- Ana de Alba to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
- Jeffrey M. Bryan to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
- Margaret Garnett to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Micah Smith to the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii
- Jamel Semper to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- Shanlyn A. S. Park to the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii
As of December 1, 2023, the Senate had confirmed 159 of President Biden's Article III judicial nominees—121 district court judges, 37 appeals court judges, and one Supreme Court justice—since his inauguration on January 20, 2021. To review a complete list of Biden's confirmed nominees, click here.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president
The chart below details the number of Article III judicial appointments during each president's first term at four specific dates: end of first year in office, end of second year, December 1 of the third year, and end of the fourth year. It includes Presidents Ronald Reagan (R) through Joe Biden (D).
- Presidents have made an average of 146.7 judicial appointments through December 1 of their third year in office.
- President George W. Bush (R) made the most appointments through December 1 of his third year with 168. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 119.
- President Donald Trump (R) made the most appointments through four years with 234. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest through four years with 166.
- President Ronald Reagan (R) made the most appointments through one year in office with 41. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 13.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through two years with 128. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 62.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president and court type
The chart below shows the number of Article III judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate under each of the last seven presidents as of December 1 of their third year in office. The confirmations are broken up by court type.
- The median number of Supreme Court appointees is one. Three presidents (Reagan, H.W. Bush, and Biden) made one appointment. Three presidents, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, made two. President George W. Bush did not appoint any SCOTUS justices by this point in his presidency.
- The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 29. President Trump had the most appointees with 48. President Reagan appointed the fewest with 23.
- The median number of United States District Court appointees is 112. President George W. Bush had the most appointees with 138. President Obama appointed the fewest with 93.
See also
- United States federal courts
- Current federal judicial vacancies
- Judicial vacancies during the Biden administration
- The Biden administration on federal courts
Footnotes
- ↑ The U.S. Courts website publishes data for the previous month on the first of the following month.
- ↑ U.S. Courts, "Judicial Vacancy List for December 2023," December 1, 2023
- ↑ For the purposes of this data, Ballotpedia considers the announcement of the intent to nominate an individual as a nomination.
|