Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Wallace Jefferson

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from Wallace B. Jefferson)
Jump to: navigation, search
Wallace B. Jefferson
Image of Wallace B. Jefferson
Prior offices
Texas Supreme Court Place 4

Education

Bachelor's

Michigan State University

Law

University of Texas School of Law


Wallace B. Jefferson was a justice of the Supreme Court of Texas. He was appointed to the court by Governor Rick Perry in March of 2001, and he was elected on November 5, 2002. Jefferson became the court's chief justice in 2004 and served in that position until September 2013. He retired on October 1, 2013.[1][2][3][4]


Wallace was the first African-American chief justice in the history of Texas.[5]

Education

Jefferson received his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University and his J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law.[1]

Career

After graduating from law school, Jefferson went into private practice. He became partner in 1991. He was appointed to the Texas Supreme Court in 2001.[6]

Awards and associations

  • 2012 Morton A. Brody Distinguished Judicial Service Award[7]
  • 1997 Outstanding Young Lawyer, San Antonio Lawyers Association
  • "Pillars of the Foundation" award, North Side Independent School District
  • 2010 President, Conference of Chief Justices
  • Chair, National Center for State Courts
  • 1998-99 President, San Antonio Bar Association
  • Former director, San Antonio Public Library Foundation
  • Former director, Alamo Area Big Brothers/Big Sisters
  • Former member, Education committee, San Antonio Area Foundation[1]

Elections

2008

Jefferson ran for re-election to the court on November 4, 2008 against Democratic challenger Jim Jordan, winning 53% of the vote. (See Texas Supreme Court elections for more information).[8]

For information on Justice Jefferson's campaign fundraising, visit: Follow the Money: Wallace Jefferson.

Candidate IncumbentSeatPartyElection %
Supreme-Court-Elections-badge.png
Wallace Jefferson ApprovedA YesChief JusticeRepublican53.1%
Jim Jordan NoChief JusticeDemocratic43.7%
Tom Oxford NoChief JusticeLibertarian3.1%


2002

Jefferson was elected to the Texas Supreme Court in 2002. He defeated William E. Moody, winning 56.76% of the vote.[9]

In his 2002 campaign, Jefferson raised roughly $1.14 million.[10]

Noteworthy cases

On Exorcisms

In a 6-3 vote, the Texas Supreme Court threw out a jury award over injuries a 17-year-old girl suffered in an exorcism conducted by members of her old church, ruling that the case unconstitutionally entangled the court in religious matters. The Supreme Court threw out the $188,000 that the Court of Appeals awarded. Justice David Medina wrote that finding the church liable "would have an unconstitutional 'chilling effect' by compelling the church to abandon core principles of its religious beliefs." But Jefferson, in a dissenting opinion, stated that the "sweeping immunity" is inconsistent with U.S. Supreme Court precedent and extends far beyond the Constitution's protections for religious conduct. "The First Amendment guards religious liberty; it does not sanction intentional abuse in religion's name," Jefferson wrote.[11]

Opinion article

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Jefferson received a campaign finance score of 0.91, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was equal to the average score of 0.91 that justices received in Texas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[12]

See also

External links

Footnotes